Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

newbie, kinda

If none of the specific sub-forums seem right for your thread, ask here.
Post Reply
Message
Author
danimalz
Posts: 2
Joined: 2005-07-23 06:34

newbie, kinda

#1 Post by danimalz »

hey everyone...

i dont usually post questions (easier to google, search, read, etc...)

anyway here's mine... :

i run a debian gateway / file server for awhile now. i am used to
recognizing devices as /dev/hda1 , etc.

i recently installed debian sarge onto a worktation to check it out,
2.4.27 kernel. Im trying to get the cdroms, etc. to mount via gnome, no luck.

so i try to look at various devices in /dev and don't recognize how it's done. some
strange entries such as /dev/ide/.../.../... unususal.

yet /etc/fstab has the normal mounts.

whats going on?? i'd apprec. a brief explanation plus relevant links.

thanks!
eat it or wear it

User avatar
dawgie
Posts: 430
Joined: 2004-06-16 21:30
Location: New Hampshire USA

Re: newbie, kinda

#2 Post by dawgie »

danimalz wrote: i recently installed debian sarge onto a worktation to check it out,
2.4.27 kernel. Im trying to get the cdroms, etc. to mount via gnome, no luck.
If you use the 2.6.x kernel,hal,udev,hotplug and a Gnome deskiop accessing Cdroms and USB devices is much, much easier.
so i try to look at various devices in /dev and don't recognize how it's done. some
strange entries such as /dev/ide/.../.../... unususal.

yet /etc/fstab has the normal mounts.

thanks!
The line in my fstab for cdrom looks like this:
/dev/hdd /cdrom udf,iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0

The Gnome desktop has options on how you want to handle removable storage:
Applications-->Desktop Preferences-->Removable Drives and Media


-Bob

danimalz
Posts: 2
Joined: 2005-07-23 06:34

thanks

#3 Post by danimalz »

thanks for that tip, i am looking into the 2.6 kernel.

anyway i am really looking for an explan of the change to
the format of the /dev directory, it's just bugging me..!

any further advise is aprec.!
eat it or wear it

Post Reply