libstdc++ weirdness

[debiandoode]

I am running a binary we've built but keep getting these errors.

./our_binary: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by ./our_binary)
./our_binary: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./our_binary)

So, it seemed that libstdc++ was missing. However, now I'm at a loss on where to start, not wanting to wreck the OS, not sure what I should be removing or adding.

Code: Select all

# apt-get install libstdc++
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.4-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.7-pic' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++5' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.1-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.1-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++2.9-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.4-pic' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.5-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.5-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++2.10-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.2-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.2-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.6-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.6-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.6-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++5-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++5-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.3-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.3-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.3-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.6-pic' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.0-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.0-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++2.8-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++5-3.3-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.7-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.7-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++5-3.3-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++3.0-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.7-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-doc' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.4-dbg' for regex 'libstdc+'
Note, selecting 'libstdc++6-4.4-dev' for regex 'libstdc+'
libstdc++6 is already the newest version.
libstdc++6-4.7-dev is already the newest version.
libstdc++6-4.7-dev set to manually installed.
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libstdc++6-4.6-dbg : Conflicts: libstdc++6-4.4-dbg but 4.4.7-2 is to be installed
 libstdc++6-4.6-doc : Conflicts: libstdc++6-4.4-doc but 4.4.7-2 is to be installed
 libstdc++6-4.7-dbg : Conflicts: libstdc++6-4.4-dbg but 4.4.7-2 is to be installed
                      Conflicts: libstdc++6-4.6-dbg but 4.6.3-14 is to be installed
 libstdc++6-4.7-doc : Conflicts: libstdc++6-4.4-doc but 4.4.7-2 is to be installed
                      Conflicts: libstdc++6-4.6-doc but 4.6.3-14 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

[squeeze]

.

[debiandoode]

According to the dev, he built it on Ubuntu;

Linux turing 4.2.0-19-generic #23-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 11 11:39:30 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

But is wanting to make it work on Debian Wheezy 7.
Linux wrt 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.65-1+deb7u2 x86_64 GNU/Linux

This is a test version.
Didn't install anything out of repo that I know of.

[squeeze]

.

[debiandoode]

Thank you, I'll pass this on to the dev.

Does it work the other way around? Something compiled on Debian will work on Ubuntu?
Basically we would like to see the binary run on as many flavors as possible which are Debian based.

[squeeze]

.

[debiandoode]

Why help others if all it does is to inflate your own ego? That's kind of dinosaur age stuff these days don't you think?
I did research but it didn't lead to anything I could understand and sometimes, it takes human interaction to better understand something.

[squeeze]

.

[debiandoode]

Would you give it a rest please. I never asked for anything for free. I simply asked a question of others. You don't have to respond if you'll get all huffed up about it. Guys like you are so boring it's amazing forums are used at all anymore. Go find something else to argue about instead of making stuff up about what I've done or not. What the heck do you know.

Grow up.

[squeeze]

.

[stevepusser]

Generally, but not always, binaries compiled on an older version of libc6 will work on newer version. You have a better chance if you compile static binaries.

Another solution would be to actually build versions on Debian and Ubuntu. The openSUSE Build Service can make this rather painless if you have debianized source code files--for example, I can upload one set of source files for Pale Moon and have it build all these versions:

https://build.opensuse.org/package/show ... r/palemoon