Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
suitability of particular live iso
suitability of particular live iso
I am planning to buy a ASUS X200MA 2GB DDR3 Ram Netbook and install Debian Live. My problem is shall I install a 32-bit or a 64-bit OS? Thanks for suggestion? A 2nd question is how shall I access the boot menu, F12 or what? I did not find an exact answer to this 2nd question from Google.
Re: suitability of particular live iso
Can you upgrade the RAM from 2G to 4G or is there no extra slot available?
If you decide to buy it, ask them in the store if you can have a quick look at the BIOS. It's likely to be either by pressing the Delete Key or F12 .
If you decide to buy it, ask them in the store if you can have a quick look at the BIOS. It's likely to be either by pressing the Delete Key or F12 .
DebianStable
Code: Select all
$ vrms
No non-free or contrib packages installed on debian! rms would be proud.
Re: suitability of particular live iso
@Kedaha, Since I'm planning to buy online I doubt if the Ram can be increased. About áccessibibility of bios, google gave either F12 or F2. I presume when the machine is switching on that will be shown on the right hand top corner of the screen, as occurs on my Dell Vostro laptop.
- sunrat
- Administrator
- Posts: 6498
- Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 476 times
Re: suitability of particular live iso
Debian live will not install to a UEFI boot system. Either go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot, or download and install from a Debian installer image if you want UEFI boot.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
Re: suitability of particular live iso
Sunrat answered that in a simple, clear way,sunrat wrote:Debian live will not install to a UEFI boot system. Either go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot, or download and install from a Debian installer image if you want UEFI boot.
But if the OP needs more details, a little effort on their part is needed.go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot
How switch to Legacy (CSM) boot
====
For a Debian system how to disable uefi?how shall i disable uefi?
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/ ... 06.html.en
I avoid the problem by not buying any computer that has that crap on it to start with. But that would be another topic.
I wouldn't even think about buying a "asus" either,...but that is besides the point.
"What we expect you have already Done"
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
- alan stone
- Posts: 269
- Joined: 2011-10-22 14:08
- Location: In my body.
Re: suitability of particular live iso
How about searching the manufacturer's website for the product model instead: see here?rudra wrote: how shall I access the boot menu, F12 or what? I did not find an exact answer to this 2nd question from Google.
Last edited by alan stone on 2017-01-29 16:09, edited 1 time in total.
Re: suitability of particular live iso
How about this Dell Inspiron 15 3000 and then replacing the pre-installed ubuntu by debian?
Re: suitability of particular live iso
i think it's plain rude how you ask a question, completely disregard advice & answers, and instead just ask a new, unrelated question.rudra wrote:How about this Dell Inspiron 15 3000 and then replacing the pre-installed ubuntu by debian?
you did that at least twice now in this thread.
why should anyone bother to answer if you just disregard it?
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: suitability of particular live iso
Aww, Garry, why the hating on Asus? I think you can search for a long,long, long time before you will find any new hardware from any OEM that doesn't have UEFI. As far as I know, Asus hasn't pulled any evil stunts with preinstalled software like Lenovo has been caught doing.GarryRicketson wrote:Sunrat answered that in a simple, clear way,sunrat wrote:Debian live will not install to a UEFI boot system. Either go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot, or download and install from a Debian installer image if you want UEFI boot.But if the OP needs more details, a little effort on their part is needed.go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot
How switch to Legacy (CSM) boot
====For a Debian system how to disable uefi?how shall i disable uefi?
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/ ... 06.html.en
I avoid the problem by not buying any computer that has that crap on it to start with. But that would be another topic.
I wouldn't even think about buying a "asus" either,...but that is besides the point.
MX Linux packager and developer
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: suitability of particular live iso
Speaking personally, I would recommend against ASUS motherboards.stevepusser wrote:why the hating on Asus?
I have assisted in too many threads on too many forums in which the ASUS motherboard firmware refused to boot anything other than the Microsoft .efi loader: this is in direct violation of the UEFI specification — I remember one thread in which the OP had to return the firmware chip to ASUS and get it exchanged for one that actually complied with the UEFI standard.
Here is the most recent example:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=222449
Just my $0.02c, of course.
deadbang
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: suitability of particular live iso
Well, that certainly settles that question. Hate on, my friends!Head_on_a_Stick wrote:Speaking personally, I would recommend against ASUS motherboards.stevepusser wrote:why the hating on Asus?
I have assisted in too many threads on too many forums in which the ASUS motherboard firmware refused to boot anything other than the Microsoft .efi loader: this is in direct violation of the UEFI specification — I remember one thread in which the OP had to return the firmware chip to ASUS and get it exchanged for one that actually complied with the UEFI standard.
Here is the most recent example:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=222449
Just my $0.02c, of course.
MX Linux packager and developer
- sunrat
- Administrator
- Posts: 6498
- Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 476 times
Re: suitability of particular live iso
I have a friend who works in one of Melbourne's busiest computer parts shops. He advised me not to buy ASUS motherboards because of a high RMA rate. The graphics cards are great though, he said.
This fits with my personal experience over the last 15 years. One ASUS mobo, died just after warranty expired. Three Gigabyte mobos, all still working fine. Three ASUS graphics cards, all still working fine.
This fits with my personal experience over the last 15 years. One ASUS mobo, died just after warranty expired. Three Gigabyte mobos, all still working fine. Three ASUS graphics cards, all still working fine.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!