Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

suitability of particular live iso

If none of the specific sub-forums seem right for your thread, ask here.
Post Reply
Message
Author
rudra
Posts: 324
Joined: 2006-06-01 15:43
Location: Kolkata, India

suitability of particular live iso

#1 Post by rudra »

I am planning to buy a ASUS X200MA 2GB DDR3 Ram Netbook and install Debian Live. My problem is shall I install a 32-bit or a 64-bit OS? Thanks for suggestion? A 2nd question is how shall I access the boot menu, F12 or what? I did not find an exact answer to this 2nd question from Google.

kedaha
Posts: 3521
Joined: 2008-05-24 12:26
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#2 Post by kedaha »

Can you upgrade the RAM from 2G to 4G or is there no extra slot available?
If you decide to buy it, ask them in the store if you can have a quick look at the BIOS. It's likely to be either by pressing the Delete Key or F12 .
DebianStable

Code: Select all

$ vrms

No non-free or contrib packages installed on debian!  rms would be proud.

rudra
Posts: 324
Joined: 2006-06-01 15:43
Location: Kolkata, India

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#3 Post by rudra »

@Kedaha, Since I'm planning to buy online I doubt if the Ram can be increased. About áccessibibility of bios, google gave either F12 or F2. I presume when the machine is switching on that will be shown on the right hand top corner of the screen, as occurs on my Dell Vostro laptop.

User avatar
debiman
Posts: 3063
Joined: 2013-03-12 07:18

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#4 Post by debiman »

preferably 64 bit but both is possible.

User avatar
sunrat
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6498
Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 476 times

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#5 Post by sunrat »

Debian live will not install to a UEFI boot system. Either go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot, or download and install from a Debian installer image if you want UEFI boot.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ”
Remember to BACKUP!

rudra
Posts: 324
Joined: 2006-06-01 15:43
Location: Kolkata, India

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#6 Post by rudra »

how shall i disable uefi?

User avatar
GarryRicketson
Posts: 5644
Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
Location: Durango, Mexico

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#7 Post by GarryRicketson »

sunrat wrote:Debian live will not install to a UEFI boot system. Either go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot, or download and install from a Debian installer image if you want UEFI boot.
Sunrat answered that in a simple, clear way,
go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot
But if the OP needs more details, a little effort on their part is needed.
How switch to Legacy (CSM) boot
====
how shall i disable uefi?
For a Debian system how to disable uefi?
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/ ... 06.html.en

I avoid the problem by not buying any computer that has that crap on it to start with. But that would be another topic.
I wouldn't even think about buying a "asus" either,...but that is besides the point.

User avatar
alan stone
Posts: 269
Joined: 2011-10-22 14:08
Location: In my body.

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#8 Post by alan stone »

rudra wrote: how shall I access the boot menu, F12 or what? I did not find an exact answer to this 2nd question from Google.
How about searching the manufacturer's website for the product model instead: see here? :idea:
Last edited by alan stone on 2017-01-29 16:09, edited 1 time in total.

rudra
Posts: 324
Joined: 2006-06-01 15:43
Location: Kolkata, India

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#9 Post by rudra »

How about this Dell Inspiron 15 3000 and then replacing the pre-installed ubuntu by debian?

User avatar
debiman
Posts: 3063
Joined: 2013-03-12 07:18

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#10 Post by debiman »

rudra wrote:How about this Dell Inspiron 15 3000 and then replacing the pre-installed ubuntu by debian?
i think it's plain rude how you ask a question, completely disregard advice & answers, and instead just ask a new, unrelated question.
you did that at least twice now in this thread.
why should anyone bother to answer if you just disregard it?

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 72 times

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#11 Post by stevepusser »

GarryRicketson wrote:
sunrat wrote:Debian live will not install to a UEFI boot system. Either go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot, or download and install from a Debian installer image if you want UEFI boot.
Sunrat answered that in a simple, clear way,
go to the setup menu and switch to Legacy (CSM) boot
But if the OP needs more details, a little effort on their part is needed.
How switch to Legacy (CSM) boot
====
how shall i disable uefi?
For a Debian system how to disable uefi?
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/ ... 06.html.en

I avoid the problem by not buying any computer that has that crap on it to start with. But that would be another topic.
I wouldn't even think about buying a "asus" either,...but that is besides the point.
Aww, Garry, why the hating on Asus? I think you can search for a long,long, long time before you will find any new hardware from any OEM that doesn't have UEFI. As far as I know, Asus hasn't pulled any evil stunts with preinstalled software like Lenovo has been caught doing.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#12 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

stevepusser wrote:why the hating on Asus?
Speaking personally, I would recommend against ASUS motherboards.

I have assisted in too many threads on too many forums in which the ASUS motherboard firmware refused to boot anything other than the Microsoft .efi loader: this is in direct violation of the UEFI specification — I remember one thread in which the OP had to return the firmware chip to ASUS and get it exchanged for one that actually complied with the UEFI standard.

Here is the most recent example:

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=222449

Just my $0.02c, of course.
deadbang

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 72 times

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#13 Post by stevepusser »

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
stevepusser wrote:why the hating on Asus?
Speaking personally, I would recommend against ASUS motherboards.

I have assisted in too many threads on too many forums in which the ASUS motherboard firmware refused to boot anything other than the Microsoft .efi loader: this is in direct violation of the UEFI specification — I remember one thread in which the OP had to return the firmware chip to ASUS and get it exchanged for one that actually complied with the UEFI standard.

Here is the most recent example:

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=222449

Just my $0.02c, of course.
Well, that certainly settles that question. Hate on, my friends!
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
sunrat
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6498
Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 476 times

Re: suitability of particular live iso

#14 Post by sunrat »

I have a friend who works in one of Melbourne's busiest computer parts shops. He advised me not to buy ASUS motherboards because of a high RMA rate. The graphics cards are great though, he said.
This fits with my personal experience over the last 15 years. One ASUS mobo, died just after warranty expired. Three Gigabyte mobos, all still working fine. Three ASUS graphics cards, all still working fine.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ”
Remember to BACKUP!

Post Reply