Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Backports
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13
Backports
Ok I followed the directions in the How to section of the site. I have the back port packages listed in K-package (kde package manager). I wanted to upgrade "Sarge" KDE Version, but I get dependices problems when I try to install. I thought that apt would check this and install the libraries and etc in the correct order to avoid this. Is this because Im not using the command line to install the packages. How can I set up K-package or Synaptic to do this.(I should add that I have not tried to install the backports with synaptic but I assume I will get the same problem)
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13
I have the backports pinned but I believe it's the 200 level. I understand that the higher the pin # the higer the hiearchy, So what you are saying is since the backports has a lower pin # k-package will not recongnize the dependices it need because the backport are consider to be lower priority than the stable packages. I this what is happening or am I completely wrong. Do you think that stable and backports is the way to go or would it be simpler to just upgrade to testing or unstable "perferably Testing".
Have a look at http://www.argon.org/~roderick/apt-pinning.html to learn about pinning.
Of course there could be a million reasons for your dependency problem. It may have notting to do with backports at all. It's hard to say without knowing exactly what kind of dependency error you get.
So if you plan to upgrade your entire system from backports and not just a few packages I think I'd recomend going for dist-upgrade to Testing instead. Testing is still 'testing' though... so the accational glitch my still happen.
Tina
Of course there could be a million reasons for your dependency problem. It may have notting to do with backports at all. It's hard to say without knowing exactly what kind of dependency error you get.
Hard to say really... but I'm running a very mixed testing/ unstable system and I have very few problems these days. I see numerous reports of Testing being rock solid so it shouldn't be much problems. After all, Etch is getting closer and closer to becomming stable.Do you think that stable and backports is the way to go or would it be simpler to just upgrade to testing or unstable "perferably Testing".
So if you plan to upgrade your entire system from backports and not just a few packages I think I'd recomend going for dist-upgrade to Testing instead. Testing is still 'testing' though... so the accational glitch my still happen.
Tina
I think what has happened is that you have a pin which tells APT to ignore backports. If you remove that pin then apt-get upgrade will probably break but you can use KPackage.specialist125 wrote:I have the backports pinned but I believe it's the 200 level. I understand that the higher the pin # the higer the hiearchy, So what you are saying is since the backports has a lower pin # k-package will not recongnize the dependices it need because the backport are consider to be lower priority than the stable packages. I this what is happening or am I completely wrong. Do you think that stable and backports is the way to go or would it be simpler to just upgrade to testing or unstable "perferably Testing".
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13
So it looks like I should forget about k-package and backports. I think I would be better off using the command line. Oh If i do a dist-upgrade tell me will that erase what I have already saved. I know I should probably backup my system and all but Im wondering what I should expect (Pros and Cons) other than the security update.I believe Testing doesn't get the security update like stable. Would I have to add alot of patches to fix problems and all.
Testing is more stable than the name suggests. Packages are first deposited in unstable, then a script (britney) transfers packages from unstable to testing - they generally have to be at least 10 days old, have no severe bugs, etc.
Testing does get security updates, just not as fast as stable does.
You need a dist-upgrade because upgrade will only upgrade packages when no packages have to be added or removed.
Testing does get security updates, just not as fast as stable does.
You need a dist-upgrade because upgrade will only upgrade packages when no packages have to be added or removed.
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13
ok so I still tried to install a newer version of kde and now I have some problems I install kdenetwork-dev backport package and eveything seem ok so I when to the next which was the kdesdk-kio-plugins and then I got dependices problems and I cant fix it with apt-get -f install plus kmail will not open and kopete is not working now and Im scared to close firefox because It might not open again either and I only have this one computer and my finals is comming up so I dont want it to do down . When I try to fix it it says
Unpacking kdesvn-kio-plugins (from .../kdesvn-kio-plugins_0.7.2-1bpo1_i386.deb)...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdesvn-kio-plugins_0.7.2-1bpo1_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/services/svn+file.protocol', which is also in package kdevelop3-plugins
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdesvn-kio-plugins_0.7.2-1bpo1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Can you help me out because I have another user who has mail in the client and will be really piss if she cant get to it. Also I can get to my file in konqueror but the internet browers will not work It their a way I can go back or fix this??????
Unpacking kdesvn-kio-plugins (from .../kdesvn-kio-plugins_0.7.2-1bpo1_i386.deb)...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdesvn-kio-plugins_0.7.2-1bpo1_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/services/svn+file.protocol', which is also in package kdevelop3-plugins
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdesvn-kio-plugins_0.7.2-1bpo1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Can you help me out because I have another user who has mail in the client and will be really piss if she cant get to it. Also I can get to my file in konqueror but the internet browers will not work It their a way I can go back or fix this??????
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13
I think I will try that instead because I cant get kmail to open so I hope the mail isn't lost
ok here is what im about to change my source.list to
# deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main
# Stable
#deb http://debian.oregonstate.edu/debian/ stable main
#deb-src http://debian.oregonstate.edu/debian/ stable main
# Security
#deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
# deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
# deb http://www.bootsplash.de/files/debian/ unstable main
# proposed additions for a 3.1 point release
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ proposed-updates main contrib non-free
# Backports
#deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main
#deb http://www.planet-moll.de/debian sarge main
# Debian Testing
deb http://debian.oregonstate.edu/debian/ testing main
deb-src http://debian.oregonstate.edu/debian/ testing main
# Testing Security
deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main
deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free
the apt-get update then
apt-get dist-upgrade
Does this look right
ok here is what im about to change my source.list to
# deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main
# Stable
#deb http://debian.oregonstate.edu/debian/ stable main
#deb-src http://debian.oregonstate.edu/debian/ stable main
# Security
#deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
# deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
# deb http://www.bootsplash.de/files/debian/ unstable main
# proposed additions for a 3.1 point release
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ proposed-updates main contrib non-free
# Backports
#deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main
#deb http://www.planet-moll.de/debian sarge main
# Debian Testing
deb http://debian.oregonstate.edu/debian/ testing main
deb-src http://debian.oregonstate.edu/debian/ testing main
# Testing Security
deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main
deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free
the apt-get update then
apt-get dist-upgrade
Does this look right
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13
do I need to commit out
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ proposed-updates main contrib non-free
oh and should I worry about that broke package that apt-get -f install didnt fix.
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ proposed-updates main contrib non-free
oh and should I worry about that broke package that apt-get -f install didnt fix.
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 2006-02-08 06:13