Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

New Anti-Spam measures

Code of conduct, suggestions, and information on forums.debian.net.
Message
Author
User avatar
dasein
Posts: 7680
Joined: 2011-03-04 01:06
Location: Terra Incantationum

Re: New Anti-Spam measures

#46 Post by dasein »

Over 17,000 actual, honest-to-gawd spam attempts per day????

Seems unlikely.

User avatar
Mez
Debian Developer, Forum Ninja
Debian Developer, Forum Ninja
Posts: 112
Joined: 2009-04-23 22:04

Re: New Anti-Spam measures

#47 Post by Mez »

dasein wrote:Over 17,000 actual, honest-to-gawd spam attempts per day????

Seems unlikely.
Well, spam "hits". Bots will generally go throguh a process of a few pages before the spam is actually posted (register, update profile, post spam) etc etc - the smart bots will check whether their action is successful - but for the most part - the bots aren't smart - and will just spam the actions at the server - hoping that they're getting through.

So the number given is attempted spam "hits" - whether that be as the initial part of the process or not.

Bulkley
Posts: 6383
Joined: 2006-02-11 18:35
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: New Anti-Spam measures

#48 Post by Bulkley »

dasein wrote:Over 17,000 actual, honest-to-gawd spam attempts per day????

Seems unlikely.
I believe it. I help moderate another website and it gets hammered. It's bots that do it. As Mez said, the number is attempts, not successes. We would be buried if we did not have a good anti-spam mod. The one that has been added to Debian User Forums has made a big improvement.

User avatar
dasein
Posts: 7680
Joined: 2011-03-04 01:06
Location: Terra Incantationum

Re: New Anti-Spam measures

#49 Post by dasein »

Bulkley wrote:We would be buried if we did not have a good anti-spam mod. The one that has been added to Debian User Forums has made a big improvement.
But we didn't have an automatic anti-spam widget in place a month or so ago,and I was part of the small group who fought the problem manually. I can't speak to other venues, but I am confident that FDN did not have anywhere near 17,000 spams per day, not even on the worst day we ever had. It's off by at least one order of magnitude.

The "overcounting" explanation makes much more sense.

Bulkley
Posts: 6383
Joined: 2006-02-11 18:35
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: New Anti-Spam measures

#50 Post by Bulkley »

dasein wrote:
Bulkley wrote:We would be buried if we did not have a good anti-spam mod. The one that has been added to Debian User Forums has made a big improvement.
But we didn't have an automatic anti-spam widget in place a month or so ago,and I was part of the small group who fought the problem manually. I can't speak to other venues, but I am confident that FDN did not have anywhere near 17,000 spams per day, not even on the worst day we ever had. It's off by at least one order of magnitude.
You dealt with what got by the Captcha. Bots keep trying until they get through. Attempts will always outnumber successes.

confuseling
Posts: 2121
Joined: 2009-10-21 01:03

Re: New Anti-Spam measures

#51 Post by confuseling »

There was always the infamous "middle number" question.

Wrong answers for that would presumably count in that 17,000.

One or two of them might have even been bots... :-)
The Forum's search box is terrible. Use site specific search, e.g.
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3A ... terms+here

Post Reply