Ubuntu 12.04.x LTS & Windows XP-SP3 (for MS FlightSim only)
Dell Precision 390, Pentium D 3.40G, 4G RAM, NVIDIA GT360, 2M VRAM (Main)
Dell Dimension E520, Pentium D 2.80G, 3G RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 9500GT, 1M VRAM
Now: Jessie on an EeePc 1005HAB
I would like the below to be small or even tiny...
[size=85]Daily use: 800MHz celeron, 512MB RAM, 32MB onboard graphics, modern linux, openbox, noscript browser add-on. The majority of the world doesn't have computer access...reuse or pay forward an old computer today.[/size]
emarkay wrote:Is this maybe a Firefox/Iceweassel issue, or (GASP!) a Linux problem? ?
mardybear wrote:I would like the below to be small or even tiny...
State your full name, occupation and purpose.
Is there a spam hunter in the house.
What is the purpose of a signature that is too small to read?
Some are considered to be standard and should be supported in just about any bbcode implementation. Other are less likely to be supported, but nonetheless popular (hence the reason they've been included here).
emarkay wrote:I noted at work in Win7 using IE (AAARRRGGGH!!!!), it displays correctly; near-microscopic. Is this maybe a Firefox/Iceweassel issue, or (GASP!) a Linux problem? ?
[size=50]The font size works just fine, and there is no real need to even use a file attachment for a signature, that is too small to read [/size]
#If one really wants it smaller
[size=25]The font size works just fine, and there is no real need to even use a file attachment for a signature, that is too small to read [/size]
emarkay wrote:Still can't upload the attachment - but it is; here's the beginning and ending lines:
... | ...
BBCode disabled here for the above post...
[size=50][i][color=#FF00FF]... | ...[/color][/i][/size]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests