Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
- bluesdog
- Posts: 2077
- Joined: 2006-02-01 09:02
- Location: Similkameen, British Columbia, Canada
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Check the nvidia build log file located at /var/cache/modass
Are you building for a stock kernel?
What nvidia-kernel-source are you using?
173.14.09-5 won't build correctly against the 2.6.30 kernels
You can safely use the nvidia-kernel-source 190.53-2 from sid, and the matching nvidia-glx driver.
Add Sid non-free deb and deb-src to your /etc/apt/sources.list, but remove it later
Are you building for a stock kernel?
What nvidia-kernel-source are you using?
173.14.09-5 won't build correctly against the 2.6.30 kernels
You can safely use the nvidia-kernel-source 190.53-2 from sid, and the matching nvidia-glx driver.
Add Sid non-free deb and deb-src to your /etc/apt/sources.list, but remove it later
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 2010-02-24 02:40
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
That was it. I used Sid for the drivers and everything installed correctly. Thank you very much!!!!!!
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Any luck with nvidia drivers from repositories (or not) and kernel 2.6.33 (experimental, sidux or liquorix)?
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Try this one:Hadret wrote:Any luck with nvidia drivers from repositories (or not) and kernel 2.6.33 (experimental, sidux or liquorix)?
Code: Select all
echo deb http://frickelplatz.de/debian/ sid main contrib non-free > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/frickelplatz.list
apt-get update
apt-get install frickelplatz-keyrings
apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source
m-a a-i -t nvidia
apt-get install nvidia-glx
Code: Select all
# apt-cache policy nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-glx
nvidia-kernel-source:
Installed: 190.53-2+c0.towo.1
Candidate: 190.53-2+c0.towo.1
Version table:
*** 190.53-2+c0.towo.1 0
500 http://frickelplatz.de sid/non-free Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
190.53-1 0
500 http://mirrors.xmission.com sid/non-free Packages
173.14.09-5 0
500 http://mirrors.xmission.com stable/non-free Packages
500 http://mirrors.xmission.com testing/non-free Packages
nvidia-glx:
Installed: 190.53-1
Candidate: 190.53-1
Version table:
*** 190.53-1 0
500 http://mirrors.xmission.com sid/non-free Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
173.14.09-5 0
500 http://mirrors.xmission.com stable/non-free Packages
500 http://mirrors.xmission.com testing/non-free Packages
Debian Sid Laptops:
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor TK-55 / 1.5G
Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2390 @ 1.86GHz / 3G
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor TK-55 / 1.5G
Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2390 @ 1.86GHz / 3G
- TheExplorer
- Posts: 254
- Joined: 2010-05-31 15:04
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Excuse me since I'm new on this forum as I have switched from 'evil ubuntu' to debian and loved it really much
I used to do the following steps, either with stock or custom kernels in Ubuntu:
Install linux headers and other needed packages like xserver-xorg-dev etc.
Alt+F1
# /etc/init.d/gdm stop
./NVIDIA-xxx.pkg1.run
# /etc/init.d/gdm start
That's it!
Should I really make all these manipulations in order to install official Nvidia driver???
I used to do the following steps, either with stock or custom kernels in Ubuntu:
Install linux headers and other needed packages like xserver-xorg-dev etc.
Alt+F1
# /etc/init.d/gdm stop
./NVIDIA-xxx.pkg1.run
# /etc/init.d/gdm start
That's it!
Should I really make all these manipulations in order to install official Nvidia driver???
Money is the evil of all root. Be free. Use Linux.
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
If the advantages of doing it the Debian way are valuable to you, then yes. Otherwise, there's not really any point. I don't. I find using the installer from nvidia's ftp reliable, easy and quick. Like you I log out (though I don't use a log in manager), log into a console as root and run the script. A two minute job.TheExplorer wrote: Should I really make all these manipulations in order to install official Nvidia driver???
Wisdom from my inbox: "do not mock at your pottenocy"
- bluesdog
- Posts: 2077
- Joined: 2006-02-01 09:02
- Location: Similkameen, British Columbia, Canada
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
dkms makes nvidia module/driver installation/update ridiculously simple
Only available in Squeeze (or Sid), but when Squeeze goes stable, I expect the number and frequency of nvidia install related posts will drastically decrease
Only available in Squeeze (or Sid), but when Squeeze goes stable, I expect the number and frequency of nvidia install related posts will drastically decrease
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: 2008-04-21 16:36
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Hello I'm currently using ubuntu 10.04 but I don't like it because it is not stable on my computer. I would like to switch back to debian squeeze for it's stability but I can't install the non free driver for my nvidia card because the nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx package is not in squeeze. I need this package because it has the drivers for my nvidia geforce mx 440 card. I am able to install this in lenny without a problem but this does not seem to work in squeeze. Is there something I can do to get this to work in squeeze? I would be using the debian squeeze kernel which is 2.6.32 at the moment. Want to ditch ubuntu for debian's stability. Thanks.
- bluesdog
- Posts: 2077
- Joined: 2006-02-01 09:02
- Location: Similkameen, British Columbia, Canada
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
The package is available in Sid/unstable.startgame412 wrote:... the nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx package is not in squeeze....
Code: Select all
$ apt-cache policy nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx
nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 96.43.16-1
Version table:
96.43.16-1 0
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org sid/non-free Packages
$ apt-cache search nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx
nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx-ia32 - NVIDIA binary Xorg driver (96xx legacy version)
nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx - NVIDIA binary Xorg driver (96xx legacy version)
nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source - NVIDIA binary kernel module source (96xx legacy version)
nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6-amd64 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for amd64
nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6-openvz-amd64 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for openvz amd64
nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6.26-2-amd64 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (legacy version)
nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 (legacy version)
eg.
Code: Select all
aptitude update
aptitude install nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx -s
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: 2008-04-21 16:36
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Thanks but what about a package for nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6.32.2 which I think is the current kernel in squeeze. Wouldn't I need a package such as this if this is the kernel I will be using in squeeze? Will the nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx source package make make the nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6.32.2 package? Thanks.
- bluesdog
- Posts: 2077
- Joined: 2006-02-01 09:02
- Location: Similkameen, British Columbia, Canada
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Yes, a module build may be necessary. Module-assistant should do the job, I think. Run module-assistant w/o any switches to invoke interactive mode, and see what's availablestartgame412 wrote:Thanks but what about a package for nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6.32.2 which I think is the current kernel in squeeze. Wouldn't I need a package such as this if this is the kernel I will be using in squeeze? Will the nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx source package make make the nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6.32.2 package? Thanks.
- craigevil
- Posts: 5391
- Joined: 2006-09-17 03:17
- Location: heaven
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 39 times
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
[nvidia dkms] For Squeeze users. Ensure you have <non-free sources> added.
"aptitude install linux-headers-2.6-`uname -r | sed 's,.*-,,'` nvidia-glx nvidia-xconfig && nvidia-xconfig -o /etc/X11/xorg.conf"
"aptitude install linux-headers-2.6-`uname -r | sed 's,.*-,,'` nvidia-glx nvidia-xconfig && nvidia-xconfig -o /etc/X11/xorg.conf"
Raspberry PI 400 Distro: Raspberry Pi OS Base: Debian Sid Kernel: 5.15.69-v8+ aarch64 DE: MATE Ram 4GB
Debian - "If you can't apt install something, it isn't useful or doesn't exist"
My Giant Sources.list
Debian - "If you can't apt install something, it isn't useful or doesn't exist"
My Giant Sources.list
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
with dkms, as long as you're installing recommends (and if you're not you should override on the command line to do so for this) all you need to do is: I recommend adding nvidia-settings to that, but everything else you need will get pulled in. The one possible exception is the kernel-header package, since if you have multiple kernels installed and a header package for ANY of the kernels the dependency will have been fulfilled. The solution to that is to make sure that you always install a header package in conjunction with a kernel image.
Actually the following will ensure that you install recommends no matter what you're settings and is all that's needed.
Note that I recommend you pull from unstable, even if you're running primarily testing. testing is still at -1, while sid is up --4. The -2 version added recommends for vdpau (which won't automatically get pulled in with -1). For more see the changelog: Debian Changelog current nvidia-graphics-drivers
nvidia-xconfig tends to add a bunch of cruft. I recommend you not use, or even install, it except as a measure of last resort. With current setups all you should need in most cases is the Device section in order to specify the driver. You can also specify driver specific options in there. Here's my current one (including some commented out settings, and some I could esaily delete since they';re set to the default value):
Code: Select all
aptitude install nvidia-kernel-dkms
Actually the following will ensure that you install recommends no matter what you're settings and is all that's needed.
Code: Select all
aptitude -r install nvidia-kernel-dkms nvidia-settings
nvidia-xconfig tends to add a bunch of cruft. I recommend you not use, or even install, it except as a measure of last resort. With current setups all you should need in most cases is the Device section in order to specify the driver. You can also specify driver specific options in there. Here's my current one (including some commented out settings, and some I could esaily delete since they';re set to the default value):
Code: Select all
Section "Device"
Identifier "Default Device"
Driver "nvidia"
Option "NoLogo" "False"
# Option "DPI" "133 x 133"
Option "Coolbits" "5"
# Option "ModeDebug" "False"
EndSection
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
In my situation I want to only install nvidia-kernel-dkms and leave behind everything else the package is pulling. I was reading about the "hold" command but I am not certain about its usage.
Is there a straight way to tell aptitude not to install something else coming with a package?
Job
Is there a straight way to tell aptitude not to install something else coming with a package?
Job
#aptitude install life
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian 12 - FreeBSD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian 12 - FreeBSD
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Can you explain exactly what you're hoping to accomplish? nvidia-kernel-dkms by itself, with none of it's dependencies, is worthless and won't really do anything. Generally speaking hard dependencies (as opposed to recommends or suggests) have to get pulled in, otherwise you end up with broken packages.Job wrote:In my situation I want to only install nvidia-kernel-dkms and leave behind everything else the package is pulling. I was reading about the "hold" command but I am not certain about its usage.
Is there a straight way to tell aptitude not to install something else coming with a package?
Job
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Right and I ended up breaking my system. Should have waited for your answer. Now I can't get back into my system, I don't have network connection in recovery mode. yahi. I am kicking myself. I wanted to see if dkms will recognize the nvidia driver already installed. Boy I was wrong....bugsbunny wrote:Can you explain exactly what you're hoping to accomplish? nvidia-kernel-dkms by itself, with none of it's dependencies, is worthless and won't really do anything. Generally speaking hard dependencies (as opposed to recommends or suggests) have to get pulled in, otherwise you end up with broken packages.Job wrote:In my situation I want to only install nvidia-kernel-dkms and leave behind everything else the package is pulling. I was reading about the "hold" command but I am not certain about its usage.
Is there a straight way to tell aptitude not to install something else coming with a package?
Job
#aptitude install life
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian 12 - FreeBSD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian 12 - FreeBSD
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
Fixed. I will never mess with that again.
#aptitude install life
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian 12 - FreeBSD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian 12 - FreeBSD
- tabernakel
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 2011-03-13 01:32
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
I tried both the NVIDIA way, and the source compile way described above, and found both of them troubling. For example, the NVIDIA way didn't recognize my card, immediately making things complicated. On the other hand, the Debian source compile way described above caused one processor core of my dual-core setup to "vanish" when the underlying kernel was recompiled, probably because of some mysterious flag that I should have set and that had (of course) not been mentioned in the HOW-TO. Therefore I cannot advise either of them unless you want to fiddle with (and learn to know) some funny build settings and waste loads of time on stuff you probably never wanted to know.
However, I found a very easy and foolproof way buried in the long NVIDIA HOW-TO of the debian wiki! It should be perfect for anyone who
a) doesn't need a specific NVIDIA driver version - most can probably live very well with the ones provided in the Debian repositories
b) has an aversion of compiling kernel packages whose compile flags and side effects probably noone fully (!) understands
c) doesn't like to play around with runlevels either
If the above is true for you, try this (without quotes):
- "su"
- "aptitude install nvidia-kernel-2.6.32-5-686" (version in package name must match the kernel you're running, check using "uname -a" if unsure)
- "aptitude install nvidia-glx" (neccessary only first time)
- "aptitude install nvidia-xconfig" (neccessary only first time)
- "nvidia-xconfig" (neccessary only first time)
- reboot
- "glxinfo |grep rendering" -> if everything worked, the output should be "direct rendering: Yes"
If you have more than one kernel installed (I grub start the 686 kernel to run the machine, but like to have an additional 486 kernel as an gnome-capable backup if I somehow manage to break the 686 kernel) you need to repeat the steps not marked with "neccessary only first time" after booting the respective kernels.
However, I found a very easy and foolproof way buried in the long NVIDIA HOW-TO of the debian wiki! It should be perfect for anyone who
a) doesn't need a specific NVIDIA driver version - most can probably live very well with the ones provided in the Debian repositories
b) has an aversion of compiling kernel packages whose compile flags and side effects probably noone fully (!) understands
c) doesn't like to play around with runlevels either
If the above is true for you, try this (without quotes):
- "su"
- "aptitude install nvidia-kernel-2.6.32-5-686" (version in package name must match the kernel you're running, check using "uname -a" if unsure)
- "aptitude install nvidia-glx" (neccessary only first time)
- "aptitude install nvidia-xconfig" (neccessary only first time)
- "nvidia-xconfig" (neccessary only first time)
- reboot
- "glxinfo |grep rendering" -> if everything worked, the output should be "direct rendering: Yes"
If you have more than one kernel installed (I grub start the 686 kernel to run the machine, but like to have an additional 486 kernel as an gnome-capable backup if I somehow manage to break the 686 kernel) you need to repeat the steps not marked with "neccessary only first time" after booting the respective kernels.
Re: Nvidia driver - Debian way, custom (or not) kernel.
The hardware listing software for gnome as root user gives this output for vga compatible driver.
product: C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] [10DE:3D0]
vendor: nVidia Corporation [10DE]
bus info: pci@0000:00:0d.0
Which driver version do I then need?
I am looking at http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html and can not find a match.
product: C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] [10DE:3D0]
vendor: nVidia Corporation [10DE]
bus info: pci@0000:00:0d.0
Which driver version do I then need?
I am looking at http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html and can not find a match.
In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always
wins - not through strength, but through persistence. - Anonymous
wins - not through strength, but through persistence. - Anonymous