Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Ultrabook install
Ultrabook install
First of all hello!!!
My problems are these
1)wifi(bcm43142)is not working (i have installed iwlwifi, see that firmware exists ,and download driver.deb from many sources but every time it failed because linux-headers are not installed ) i don't know what else to try
2)cinnamon is running in rendering mode , i have 2 gpus the "internal" and an "external" and debian are running with the intel internal gpu .i have installed nvidia drivers but .conf file has not been created and nvidia-xconfig command results with command not found.
3)at last i want to know if there is a way to use for cashing the sshd (1tb +24gb) in linux (the system is dual boot with windows but if windows prevents linux cashing ability i will erase them )
kernel is 3.16.0-4-amd64
ultrabook link https://www.asus.com/Notebooks/X302LJ/specifications/
Thanks in advance
My problems are these
1)wifi(bcm43142)is not working (i have installed iwlwifi, see that firmware exists ,and download driver.deb from many sources but every time it failed because linux-headers are not installed ) i don't know what else to try
2)cinnamon is running in rendering mode , i have 2 gpus the "internal" and an "external" and debian are running with the intel internal gpu .i have installed nvidia drivers but .conf file has not been created and nvidia-xconfig command results with command not found.
3)at last i want to know if there is a way to use for cashing the sshd (1tb +24gb) in linux (the system is dual boot with windows but if windows prevents linux cashing ability i will erase them )
kernel is 3.16.0-4-amd64
ultrabook link https://www.asus.com/Notebooks/X302LJ/specifications/
Thanks in advance
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
Re: Ultrabook install
Welcome to the forum, Did you do any searches on this ?
Search found 38 matches: +nvidia +drivers +asus +laptop
In a nut shell the nvdia drivers, and asus are about the worst harware one could have, it is extremely difficult to get Debian working on that junk, Debian is a great OS, but from what I have seen here on the forum, Asus , with it's Nvdia drivers is just NOT able to handle or work well with Debian,or Linux, while most other equipment does.
I am not sure if anyone has even successfully solved the problem with Asus, and the nvdia drivers,..look through the topics/threads on this.
In most of those threads, this is what is suggested:
https://wiki.debian.org/Bumblebee
https://wiki.debian.org/Bumblebee#Bumblebee_Project
--------------- edited-----
Something I notice when I looked at the Asus specs: they say:
This does not mean it is impossible to install Debian on it, but it does explain why there are so many problems with this kind of poorly designed hardware.
Search found 38 matches: +nvidia +drivers +asus +laptop
In a nut shell the nvdia drivers, and asus are about the worst harware one could have, it is extremely difficult to get Debian working on that junk, Debian is a great OS, but from what I have seen here on the forum, Asus , with it's Nvdia drivers is just NOT able to handle or work well with Debian,or Linux, while most other equipment does.
I am not sure if anyone has even successfully solved the problem with Asus, and the nvdia drivers,..look through the topics/threads on this.
In most of those threads, this is what is suggested:
https://wiki.debian.org/Bumblebee
https://wiki.debian.org/Bumblebee#Bumblebee_Project
--------------- edited-----
Something I notice when I looked at the Asus specs: they say:
This just goes to show what junk they really are, they recommend using a poorly designed OS, the computer is designed intentionally to support Windows, but not Debian or Linux .X302LJ
FeaturesSpecificationsGallerySupport
ASUS recommends Windows.
This does not mean it is impossible to install Debian on it, but it does explain why there are so many problems with this kind of poorly designed hardware.
Last edited by GarryRicketson on 2015-10-26 04:44, edited 5 times in total.
"What we expect you have already Done"
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
- dilberts_left_nut
- Administrator
- Posts: 5347
- Joined: 2009-10-05 07:54
- Location: enzed
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Ultrabook install
My card is not listed in this manualdilberts_left_nut wrote:1) https://wiki.debian.org/bcm43xx
i have tried this https://wiki.debian.org/wl where my card is listed but when i "modprobe wl" it responds wl is an invalid argument
i have installed bumblebee,it's propably not running because nvidia drivers are installing but intel gpu is driving the systemdilberts_left_nut wrote:2) https://wiki.debian.org/Bumblebee
it has an sshd it's an classic hdd with a little ssd which works as cashe for the hdd for speeddilberts_left_nut wrote:
3) What?
Wifi is the main issue for me right now ufortunally ,also the led of the flight mode is on but with rfkill nothing is blocked,when i enable flight mode led goes off but everything is soft blocked (i said that if thats a clue )
Sorry for waiting
Last edited by fffx64 on 2015-10-30 19:44, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ultrabook install
If you are referring to a hybrid hard drive (a conventional hard disk with a solid state cache) I believe it works at the hardware level. Just use it like a normal hard disk drive.fffx64 wrote:[...]
3) What?
it has an sshd it's an classic hdd with a little ssd which works as cashe for the hdd for speed
[...]
Re: Ultrabook install
i thought the same thing but it doesn't work ,i installed and windows (for the problem of the wifi) and in windows it wanted intel rapid storage to work as an hybrid drive. never mind,that maybe can't be solved especialy with dual boot with windows.RU55EL wrote: If you are referring to a hybrid hard drive (a conventional hard disk with a solid state cache) I believe it works at the hardware level. Just use it like a normal hard disk drive.
wifi is the main problem right now because it lost all of it's portability
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo ... bug=757984 can i escape from this?
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: Ultrabook install
You aren't following the wiki procedure for wl somehow, but you need to copy and paste your commands & results here for us to spot what's wrong. You can't build it without headers, to begin with. You do understand that most of those commands have to be run as administrator, right?
MX Linux packager and developer
Re: Ultrabook install
o fcourse everything is running as rootstevepusser wrote:You aren't following the wiki procedure for wl somehow, but you need to copy and paste your commands & results here for us to spot what's wrong. You can't build it without headers, to begin with. You do understand that most of those commands have to be run as administrator, right?
after many atemps and changes it didn't sent an error
Code: Select all
apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,') broadcom-sta-dkms
for
Code: Select all
modprobe wl
Code: Select all
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'wl': Invalid argument
modprobe: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod-module.c:960 command_do() Error running install command for wl
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'wl': Operation not permitted
Re: Ultrabook install
I spoke too soon. [pulling foot from mouth] According to wikipedia SSHD drives have a self optimizing mode that operates independent of the host operating system, and a host optimized mode that enables some control from the host operating system. While there are some patches for the linux kernel, it doesn't look like these features are included in the currently developed linux kernel.fffx64 wrote:i thought the same thing but it doesn't work ,i installed and windows (for the problem of the wifi) and in windows it wanted intel rapid storage to work as an hybrid drive. never mind,that maybe can't be solved especialy with dual boot with windows.RU55EL wrote: If you are referring to a hybrid hard drive (a conventional hard disk with a solid state cache) I believe it works at the hardware level. Just use it like a normal hard disk drive.
wifi is the main problem right now because it lost all of it's portability
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo ... bug=757984 can i escape from this?
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: Ultrabook install
The simple way to make sure you have everything to build that driver is to use module-assistant:fffx64 wrote:o fcourse everything is running as rootstevepusser wrote:You aren't following the wiki procedure for wl somehow, but you need to copy and paste your commands & results here for us to spot what's wrong. You can't build it without headers, to begin with. You do understand that most of those commands have to be run as administrator, right?
after many atemps and changes it didn't sent an errorCode: Select all
apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,') broadcom-sta-dkms
fori getCode: Select all
modprobe wl
Code: Select all
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'wl': Invalid argument modprobe: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod-module.c:960 command_do() Error running install command for wl modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'wl': Operation not permitted
Code: Select all
apt-get install module-assistant
m-a prepare
MX Linux packager and developer
Re: Ultrabook install
stevepusser wrote:I asked for the output of commands...people have said there have been no errors in the outputs before, when there have been, unfortunately.Code: Select all
apt-get install module-assistant m-a prepare
Code: Select all
root@ultrabookara:/home/fotis# m-a prepare
Getting source for kernel version: 3.16.0-4-amd64
Kernel headers available in /lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/build
apt-get install build-essential
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
build-essential is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Done!
root@ultrabookara:/home/fotis# apt-get update
Ign http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie InRelease
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie-updates InRelease
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie Release.gpg
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net jessie InRelease
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates InRelease
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net jessie Release.gpg
Get:1 http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie-updates/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex [367 B]
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net jessie Release
Get:2 http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie-updates/main i386 Packages/DiffIndex [367 B]
Ign http://http.debian.net jessie InRelease
Hit http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports InRelease
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie Release
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie-updates/main Sources
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie Release.gpg
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie-updates/contrib Sources
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie-updates/contrib amd64 Packages
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie-updates/contrib i386 Packages
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie-updates/contrib Translation-en
Get:3 http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex [505 B]
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie-updates/main Translation-en
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/main Sources
Get:4 http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/contrib amd64 Packages [8,714 B]
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/contrib Sources
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie/main Sources
Get:5 http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/non-free amd64 Packages [21.5 kB]
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/contrib amd64 Packages
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie/main i386 Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/main i386 Packages
Hit http://ftp.gr.debian.org jessie/main Translation-en
Get:6 http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/main i386 Packages/DiffIndex [919 B]
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/contrib i386 Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/contrib Translation-en
Get:7 http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/contrib i386 Packages [8,701 B]
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/main Translation-en
Get:8 http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/non-free i386 Packages [22.6 kB]
Err http://ppa.launchpad.net jessie/main amd64 Packages
404 Not Found
Get:9 http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/contrib Translation-en [6,265 B]
Err http://ppa.launchpad.net jessie/main i386 Packages
404 Not Found
Get:10 http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/main Translation-en/DiffIndex [229 B]
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net jessie/main Translation-en_US
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net jessie/main Translation-en
Get:11 http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/non-free Translation-en [21.5 kB]
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie Release
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie/contrib amd64 Packages
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie/non-free amd64 Packages
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie/main i386 Packages
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie/contrib i386 Packages
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie/non-free i386 Packages
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie/contrib Translation-en
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie/main Translation-en
Hit http://http.debian.net jessie/non-free Translation-en
Fetched 2,387 B in 5s (470 B/s)
W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/bumblebee/stable/ubuntu/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/bumblebee/stable/ubuntu/dists/jessie/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
root@ultrabookara:/home/fotis# apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,') broadcom-sta-dkms
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
linux-headers-amd64 is already the newest version.
broadcom-sta-dkms is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
root@ultrabookara:/home/fotis# modprobe -r b44 b43 b43legacy ssb brcmsmac
root@ultrabookara:/home/fotis# modprobe wl
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'wl': Invalid argument
modprobe: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod-module.c:960 command_do() Error running install command for wl
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'wl': Operation not permitted
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: Ultrabook install
OK, your system is broken somehow. I don't know its history, but the output above shows wheezy-backports enabled, plus an attempt to use an Ubuntu PPA, so I'd guess it's probably some messing around with repositories that broke it, because wl will load first time, every time, on an unborked system if the procedure is followed.
That would have been obvious from the start if the output was provided; instead people have wasted time on this.
That would have been obvious from the start if the output was provided; instead people have wasted time on this.
MX Linux packager and developer
Re: Ultrabook install
So a clear install is the only solution?stevepusser wrote:OK, your system is broken somehow. I don't know its history, but the output above shows wheezy-backports enabled, plus an attempt to use an Ubuntu PPA, so I'd guess it's probably some messing around with repositories that broke it, because wl will load first time, every time, on an unborked system if the procedure is followed.
That would have been obvious from the start if the output was provided; instead people have wasted time on this.
- dilberts_left_nut
- Administrator
- Posts: 5347
- Joined: 2009-10-05 07:54
- Location: enzed
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Ultrabook install
No, but f you don't know what you've installed from where, or have a good grasp of how the packaging system works, then it's likely the quickest.fffx64 wrote:So a clear install is the only solution?
AdrianTM wrote:There's no hacker in my grandma...