Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init system

User discussion about Debian Development, Debian Project News and Announcements. Not for support questions.

How would you vote?

In general, software may not require one specific init system to be PID 1.
39
83%
Package maintainers are strongly encouraged to add support for any init system, but are not required to.
3
6%
Debian packages may require a specific init system to be executed as PID 1.
2
4%
Things are working adequately and thus this General Resolution is not required.
3
6%
 
Total votes: 47

Message
Author
User avatar
golinux
Posts: 1579
Joined: 2010-12-09 00:56
Location: not a 'buntard!
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#21 Post by golinux »

saulgoode wrote:
dilberts_left_nut wrote:Voting for 2 (doesn't want to work from my phone will try again later).
(edit: still won't work - "the submtted form is invalid" ... ? )
Were you able to resolve this, yet? It is concerning if you are unable to vote and if there is something that needs to be done by me to address this, please let me know.
I had to change themes in order to vote properly.
May the FORK be with you!

anticapitalista
Posts: 429
Joined: 2007-12-14 23:16
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#22 Post by anticapitalista »

golinux wrote:
saulgoode wrote:
dilberts_left_nut wrote:Voting for 2 (doesn't want to work from my phone will try again later).
(edit: still won't work - "the submtted form is invalid" ... ? )
Were you able to resolve this, yet? It is concerning if you are unable to vote and if there is something that needs to be done by me to address this, please let me know.
I had to change themes in order to vote properly.

More RedHat shenanigans?
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
fleabus
Posts: 98
Joined: 2013-08-28 18:36
Location: Winchester, VA, USA

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#23 Post by fleabus »

8)
Last edited by fleabus on 2014-11-25 02:16, edited 1 time in total.
Lenovo Legion 5-15IMH05 32GB Ram, 2TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe SSD

User avatar
golinux
Posts: 1579
Joined: 2010-12-09 00:56
Location: not a 'buntard!
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#24 Post by golinux »

anticapitalista wrote:
golinux wrote:
saulgoode wrote: Were you able to resolve this, yet? It is concerning if you are unable to vote and if there is something that needs to be done by me to address this, please let me know.
I had to change themes in order to vote properly.
More RedHat shenanigans?
Nah. This happened to me on Squeeze still on Iceweasel 10 something. Some of the forum templates are a little funky. Code probably not up to date with the latest phpBB or web standards . . .
May the FORK be with you!

User avatar
dilberts_left_nut
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 5346
Joined: 2009-10-05 07:54
Location: enzed
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 66 times

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#25 Post by dilberts_left_nut »

Cheers golinux - changed theme to prosilver and vote went through.
(Was redsilver3).
AdrianTM wrote:There's no hacker in my grandma...

User avatar
golinux
Posts: 1579
Joined: 2010-12-09 00:56
Location: not a 'buntard!
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#26 Post by golinux »

dilberts_left_nut wrote:Cheers golinux - changed theme to prosilver and vote went through.
(Was redsilver3).
Yup. redsilver3 was the one that hung me up too.
May the FORK be with you!

steve_v
df -h | grep > 20TiB
df -h | grep > 20TiB
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
Location: /dev/chair
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#27 Post by steve_v »

While I have no real objection to systemd _as an init system_, shoving so much not-realy-inits-job code into PID1 makes me profoundly uncomfortable.
Not being able to run a full DE without this way-more-than-just-init monstrosity in PID1 (or recompiling half the distro) makes me profoundly annoyed.
Slackware is where I began, if this carries on I may well return there. FreeBSD is also looking pretty tasty right now...
Have a wild guess which way I voted ;)
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.

anticapitalista
Posts: 429
Joined: 2007-12-14 23:16
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#28 Post by anticapitalista »

golinux wrote: Yup. redsilver3 was the one that hung me up too.
But, was redsilver3 written by Poettering?
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
saulgoode
Posts: 1445
Joined: 2007-10-22 11:34
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#29 Post by saulgoode »

I made a mistake in my initial post of this thread in stating that the requisite discussion period for the General Resolution had not started. I took the "TBC" status for the discussion to mean that it was yet "to be confirmed" or somesuch, and that the page would be updated once the official discussion period commenced.

But recent postings on the debian-vote mailing list suggest that the discussion period either 1) is now completed or 2) has only a day or two remaining. In either case, it is recommended that those wishing to voice their opinions on the issue do so without delay.

I apologize for the misunderstanding.
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -- Brian Kernighan

User avatar
saulgoode
Posts: 1445
Joined: 2007-10-22 11:34
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#30 Post by saulgoode »

I posted my two cents to the mailing list.

https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/20 ... 00019.html
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -- Brian Kernighan

s2pido
Posts: 18
Joined: 2011-12-20 00:08
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#31 Post by s2pido »

With only one day remaining in the voting period, fewer than 500 (of the 1000+ DDs) have bothered to vote?
https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initcoupling/

Is such a low participation percentage typical?

User avatar
saulgoode
Posts: 1445
Joined: 2007-10-22 11:34
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#32 Post by saulgoode »

s2pido wrote:With only one day remaining in the voting period, ...
The voting period extends until the end of Tuesday, November 18th (UTC). https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_003
s2pido wrote:... fewer than 500 (of the 1000+ DDs) have bothered to vote?
https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initcoupling/

Is such a low participation percentage typical?
I was thinking it was progressing rather well, given there are still about five days left. It is, at a minimum, nice to see that the issue won't just be decided by a handful of advocates (regardless of their position).
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -- Brian Kernighan

fruitofloom
Posts: 183
Joined: 2014-10-27 21:28

Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste

#33 Post by fruitofloom »

saulgoode wrote:
s2pido wrote:
s2pido wrote:... fewer than 500 (of the 1000+ DDs) have bothered to vote?
https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initcoupling/

Is such a low participation percentage typical?
I was thinking it was progressing rather well, given there are still about five days left. It is, at a minimum, nice to see that the issue won't just be decided by a handful of advocates (regardless of their position).
You mean like in most other distributions, say Slackware, huh? :-)
Kidding aside this sure is way better
(I like the joke, but it is really just that: a joke. Perhaps a stupid one).

Still convinced the very best is to vote with the feet to put some pressure on Debian, to show that *that* is not what one has in mind when thinking of Debian. That will make them think, and only that (replacing systemd with sysv and pinning *systemd* including the libs *and* installing popularity-contest is another option, less strong and way too much work, imho).
Give me convenience or give me death.

Post Reply