Page 5 of 5

Re: Biggest mistake ever made by Debian

PostPosted: 2018-01-09 10:44
by czeekaj
As a new User of linux in general I agree. I came from windows and went to linux to getaway from windows and SystemD feels more like Windows. The binary logs especially
I used a bit of SysV and it was really nice being able to set up a boot order with it. It's more transparent. It also tells me When Intel ME hangs on boot.
SystemD i have no clue and I spent more time with it than SysV. I feel it's poorly implemented. I was able to disable bluetooth easily and could see it there and know it wont boot.

I heard someone do parrallel booting without systemD. So don't tell me that's why it's around.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzFEYDFlK_k

How about a SysX and make everyone happy :)

Re: Biggest mistake ever made by Debian

PostPosted: 2018-01-09 14:24
by acewiza
Somebody should lock this thread, just to keep the trolls out.

Re: Biggest mistake ever made by Debian

PostPosted: 2018-01-09 15:22
by golinux
This thread had been dormant for nearly a year. Someone dredged it up because systemd is well . . . still systemd and continuing to create havoc for lots of folks. You can hide the reality but that doesn't mean it's not there. Is that trollish enough for you? :D

Re: Biggest mistake ever made by Debian

PostPosted: 2018-01-09 15:37
by acewiza
Somebody dredged it up because there are still a bunch of butthurt jackholes out there that just can't seem to get over themselves.