Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Ideas for separation of "base system"

User discussion about Debian Development, Debian Project News and Announcements. Not for support questions.
Message
Author
ciol
Posts: 28
Joined: 2006-10-27 20:24

#46 Post by ciol »

Ay wrote: How about a small business that has people working in an office with several workstations? Those desktop systems need to be rock solid to maintain productivity. Windows could be a problem due to cost. So wouldn't Debian be a good choice there? I think it would be. Situations like that, and for important servers.
1) Those small enterprises have money (they had Windows before right?). It's very hard for Debian (lack of man power), to do what Red Hat does.

2) The main point is there. Since it's very difficult for Debian to release, Debian should not release *everything* as -stable. Do the small enterprises and servers need ion? Games? I don't think so. You can even chose to freeze only either KDE or Gnome. Only pidgin and not aMSN, etc.


Comment: When I edit my posts, it's only to fix English mistakes.

User avatar
BioTube
Posts: 7520
Joined: 2007-06-01 04:34

#47 Post by BioTube »

But why? Plenty of desktop users go with Etch.
Image
Ludwig von Mises wrote:The elite should be supreme by virtue of persuasion, not by the assistance of firing squads.

ciol
Posts: 28
Joined: 2006-10-27 20:24

#48 Post by ciol »

Plenty of desktop users want to kill themselves when they notice the lost potential of Debian.

User avatar
Telemachus
Posts: 4574
Joined: 2006-12-25 15:53
Been thanked: 2 times

#49 Post by Telemachus »

As exciting as all this wonderful debate is, somebody should tell the OP: this isn't an "official" Debian forum. Very few Debian developers seem to hang out here. We're just users. Even if you convince all of us that your plan is perfect, nothing will happen.

If you want to make an official wish-list request, do it on a Debian developer mailing list.
"We have not been faced with the need to satisfy someone else's requirements, and for this freedom we are grateful."
Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, The UNIX Time-Sharing System

User avatar
AdrianTM
Posts: 2499
Joined: 2004-09-19 01:08

#50 Post by AdrianTM »

Telemachus wrote:If you want to make an official wish-list request, do it on a Debian developer mailing list.
Good point.

I'm also weary of people who come up with great ideas about "how to fix Linux" or "how to improve Debian". Usually people who work on Linux, Debian, etc are pretty smart and take the decisions being more informed about goes on and what's possible or not.

There's always this type of guy who comes on Linux forums and accuses everybody that they are blind that they don't see that Linux could be great only if... this discussion is pretty similar, "Debian would be great, if..." however most of the proposed ideas are good and many times they go exactly against of spirit of the thing they are supposed to fix. For example in this case making Debian less stable.
Ubuntu hate is a mental derangement.

ciol
Posts: 28
Joined: 2006-10-27 20:24

#51 Post by ciol »

Telemachus wrote: If you want to make an official wish-list request, do it on a Debian developer mailing list.
Nobody will listen and you will find the old same arguments: "use testing", "stable is stable period".
Furthermore, there is already a wiki page about this: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseProposals
Of course, this is useless. We all know nothing changed and nothing will change.

User avatar
AdrianTM
Posts: 2499
Joined: 2004-09-19 01:08

#52 Post by AdrianTM »

ciol wrote:
Telemachus wrote: If you want to make an official wish-list request, do it on a Debian developer mailing list.
Nobody will listen and you will find the old same arguments: "use testing", "stable is stable period".
Furthermore, there is already a wiki page about this: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseProposals
Of course, this is useless. We all know nothing changed and nothing will change.
So, then, why do you make the request here? Do you like to blow hot air? In a way I understand you, I do too 8) but seriously, what do you try to accomplish if you already know that nobody will listen and you already know the responses you are going to get?
Ubuntu hate is a mental derangement.

ciol
Posts: 28
Joined: 2006-10-27 20:24

#53 Post by ciol »

There is still a hope... A random DD, a random night...
If only Debian listened to me, it would be the end of Microsoft, because a lot more of people would use Debian and contribute. Really. I would.

Burnside
Posts: 614
Joined: 2006-07-23 20:33
Location: Bend, OR

#54 Post by Burnside »

You know you are free to create a derivative distro if you want. You seem pretty passionate about the idea, why not make your own?

ciol
Posts: 28
Joined: 2006-10-27 20:24

#55 Post by ciol »

You know you are free to create a derivative distro if you want. You seem pretty passionate about the idea, why not make your own?
I think I will.
I already found a distro which nearly looks like what I'm looking for: http://lapwing.org/

Quote:
It doesn't use the current development model of "freezing" packages for a release; the core packages (such as glibc, GCC, UDEV etc) are frozen to ensure stability, but all packages "above" this are renewed as and when needed.
But I think the base should have at least xorg.
I have several others ideas too. So it's far to be perfect.

Post Reply