Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
alternative web browsers reflection...
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
Sorry for stepping out for a month, meant to follow-up earlier. Obviously didn't test all available Linux browsers but for sure the ones that might meet my needs, which include stable/mature software, simple old-style interface, highly configurable, bookmark sync across multiple systems, full noScript type control. This is what i settled on and maybe it will help others should future versions of Iceweasel mimick Firefox's undesirable IMO Australis theme.
1. Firefox with the Classic Theme Restorer add-on. This would be the simplest solution (duh) but not my preference. I don't like installing extra add-ons if not required and the classic theme restorer does not fix all issues related to Australis/new Firefox releases.
2. Pale Moon. Used it for several weeks on an old Ubuntu install and plan to keep it as that system's primary browser. Runs stable and snappy enough. Based on Firefox with supposedly *optimized* code for newer hardware (requires an SSE2 capable processor). Less of an installation footprint than firefox but does not support old processors. Runs all of my favourite Firefox add-ons, stable, easy to set up, traditional interface, lots of configuration options, etc. Really like this browser. More info can be found here: http://www.palemoon.org/info.shtml. Doesn't follow Firefox's quick release cycle - thank goodness. Syncs with Firefox/Iceweasel no problem. Does not require installation and can simply be run from the executable or via symbolic link. When first run creates a new profile in ~/.moonchild productions so it doesn't interfere with any Iceweasel/Firefox install and can be run concurrently, which came in handy when setting up sync and select about:config preferences. Firefox based so it can still utilize any preferred userChrome.css script.
3. SeaMonkey. Not sure why i didn't think of this earlier and nobody mentioned it in the thread - not very popular i guess. I first tried SeaMonkey quite a while ago but don't think it was compatible with Firefox sync at the time. It's based on mozilla code. Still like it and am presently running it instead of Firefox on my oldest computer, which does not have an SSE2 compatible processor and can't run Pale Moon. SeaMonkey seems to run slower than Firefox, especially when processing scripts, and this observation appears to be supported by online performance comparisons. It is, however, very stable and just feels solid. Not compatible with all Firefox add-ons but all of my favourite add-ons still worked with one exception (autoclose bookmark&history folders). It is compatible with Firefox sync except the latest release (version 2.26) broke sync indefinitely with no fixes planned for releases 2.26-2.29. This was a deal breaker for me but was able to work around the issue by installing version 2.25 first, setting up sync and then upgrading to version 2.26. Now sync works just fine. Similar to Pale Moon and Iceweasel, SeaMonkey is also highly configurable and has a very simple logical layout. It creates a separate seamonkey folder in ~/.mozilla and can also run concurrently with Firefox. SeaMonkey does not require installation and can also be simply run from the executable or via symbolic link and still utilizes a userChrome.css script if desired. Just use it as a browser but it's actually a suite that includes a built-in mail and newsgroup client as well as an html editor. Definitely worth trialing. Even though it's a little sluggish i plan on continuing with it and it may one day be my primary browser. More info here: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
Sorry for the long post but i thought it migh be an insightful read for anyone interested in alternative browsers, especially for those who don't have as much free time on their hands to test browsers
1. Firefox with the Classic Theme Restorer add-on. This would be the simplest solution (duh) but not my preference. I don't like installing extra add-ons if not required and the classic theme restorer does not fix all issues related to Australis/new Firefox releases.
2. Pale Moon. Used it for several weeks on an old Ubuntu install and plan to keep it as that system's primary browser. Runs stable and snappy enough. Based on Firefox with supposedly *optimized* code for newer hardware (requires an SSE2 capable processor). Less of an installation footprint than firefox but does not support old processors. Runs all of my favourite Firefox add-ons, stable, easy to set up, traditional interface, lots of configuration options, etc. Really like this browser. More info can be found here: http://www.palemoon.org/info.shtml. Doesn't follow Firefox's quick release cycle - thank goodness. Syncs with Firefox/Iceweasel no problem. Does not require installation and can simply be run from the executable or via symbolic link. When first run creates a new profile in ~/.moonchild productions so it doesn't interfere with any Iceweasel/Firefox install and can be run concurrently, which came in handy when setting up sync and select about:config preferences. Firefox based so it can still utilize any preferred userChrome.css script.
3. SeaMonkey. Not sure why i didn't think of this earlier and nobody mentioned it in the thread - not very popular i guess. I first tried SeaMonkey quite a while ago but don't think it was compatible with Firefox sync at the time. It's based on mozilla code. Still like it and am presently running it instead of Firefox on my oldest computer, which does not have an SSE2 compatible processor and can't run Pale Moon. SeaMonkey seems to run slower than Firefox, especially when processing scripts, and this observation appears to be supported by online performance comparisons. It is, however, very stable and just feels solid. Not compatible with all Firefox add-ons but all of my favourite add-ons still worked with one exception (autoclose bookmark&history folders). It is compatible with Firefox sync except the latest release (version 2.26) broke sync indefinitely with no fixes planned for releases 2.26-2.29. This was a deal breaker for me but was able to work around the issue by installing version 2.25 first, setting up sync and then upgrading to version 2.26. Now sync works just fine. Similar to Pale Moon and Iceweasel, SeaMonkey is also highly configurable and has a very simple logical layout. It creates a separate seamonkey folder in ~/.mozilla and can also run concurrently with Firefox. SeaMonkey does not require installation and can also be simply run from the executable or via symbolic link and still utilizes a userChrome.css script if desired. Just use it as a browser but it's actually a suite that includes a built-in mail and newsgroup client as well as an html editor. Definitely worth trialing. Even though it's a little sluggish i plan on continuing with it and it may one day be my primary browser. More info here: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
Sorry for the long post but i thought it migh be an insightful read for anyone interested in alternative browsers, especially for those who don't have as much free time on their hands to test browsers
800mhz, 512mb ram, dCore-jessie (Tiny Core with Debian Jessie packages) with BusyBox and Fluxbox.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
You are forgiven.mardybear wrote:Sorry for stepping out for a month, meant to follow-up earlier.
I thought it was no longer in development.3. SeaMonkey. Not sure why i didn't think of this earlier and nobody mentioned it in the thread - not very popular i guess.
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
Still very much active...the latest stable release was June 16, 2014.
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
Great alternative browser, especially if you like rootin' for the underdog.
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
Great alternative browser, especially if you like rootin' for the underdog.
800mhz, 512mb ram, dCore-jessie (Tiny Core with Debian Jessie packages) with BusyBox and Fluxbox.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
That is good to know. Thanks. It is indeed a good browser.Still very much active
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
My confusion was due to Debian discontinuing support of IceMonkey. Your bringing it up prompted me to give it another try after a couple years. I am now using it with my Slackware system. I like SeaMonkey very much. It is like a sane Firefox.
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
Yeah sane Firefox. Took a little longer to setup just right but really good browser.
Not sure how much changed, but Linux releases for upcoming SeaMonkey 2.27 can be found here. Although i also remember reading v2.27 might be cancelled as they proceed towards v2.28. Hopefully this is not an indication of slowing development.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/ ... ral-trunk/
I generally only use 3-5 add-ons and the only one that didn't work in SeaMonkey was autoclose bookmark&history folders, which i was able to install using this SeaMonkey extension converter...now works flawlessly.
http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/
Not sure how much changed, but Linux releases for upcoming SeaMonkey 2.27 can be found here. Although i also remember reading v2.27 might be cancelled as they proceed towards v2.28. Hopefully this is not an indication of slowing development.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/ ... ral-trunk/
I generally only use 3-5 add-ons and the only one that didn't work in SeaMonkey was autoclose bookmark&history folders, which i was able to install using this SeaMonkey extension converter...now works flawlessly.
http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/
800mhz, 512mb ram, dCore-jessie (Tiny Core with Debian Jessie packages) with BusyBox and Fluxbox.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
I claimed it is a thing of beauty. Here is the proof.
http://static.dyp.im/HHnNzEvDGs/a21dda6 ... ba97c7.png
http://static.dyp.im/HHnNzEvDGs/a21dda6 ... ba97c7.png
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
not to be offensive but that's ugly as hell i think it is almost impossible to find uglier skins
ThinkPad X220: i5-2520M CPU 2.5GHz - 8GB RAM 1333 MHz - SSD 860 EVO 250GB - Debian - ME_cleaned
ThinkPad X230: i5-3320M CPU 3.3GHz - 8GB RAM 1600 MHz - SSD 860 EVO 500GB - Debian - ME_cleaned
ThinkPad X230: i5-3320M CPU 3.3GHz - 8GB RAM 1600 MHz - SSD 860 EVO 500GB - Debian - ME_cleaned
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
Oh, my feelings are hurt.
You obviously have no sense of aesthetic beauty.
The good thing is, no matter how ugly a GUI is, it is better looking than I am.
You obviously have no sense of aesthetic beauty.
The good thing is, no matter how ugly a GUI is, it is better looking than I am.
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
not to be offensive but that's ugly as hell i think it is almost impossible to find uglier skins
That's what i was thinking too but didn't want to say anything...and i even like the look of default SeaMonkey, which some say belongs back in the Windows95 era. The wood grain look reminds me of the 1978 plymouth woody station wagon i learned to drive as a teenager. Randicus - you have style. The beauty of Linux - everyone can have it his/her own way.
edit: thought Randicus was spelled Randiculus
800mhz, 512mb ram, dCore-jessie (Tiny Core with Debian Jessie packages) with BusyBox and Fluxbox.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
Each to their own, I suppose...Randicus wrote:I claimed it is a thing of beauty. Here is the proof.
http://static.dyp.im/HHnNzEvDGs/a21dda6 ... ba97c7.png
Here is my idea of beauty in a browser (dwb):
deadbang
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
I do not see an image, only "http://s9.postimg.org/nksrs46oe/2014_09 ... _scrot.jpg"
But not a problem. I am familiar with dwb. It is beautiful.
But not a problem. I am familiar with dwb. It is beautiful.
Another uncultured boor completely lacking good taste.mardybear wrote:That's what i was thinking too but didn't want to say anything...
That is indeed one alternate spelling.thought Randicus was spelled Randiculus
- craigevil
- Posts: 5391
- Joined: 2006-09-17 03:17
- Location: heaven
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 39 times
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
Take a look at http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... &t=2824649
Raspberry PI 400 Distro: Raspberry Pi OS Base: Debian Sid Kernel: 5.15.69-v8+ aarch64 DE: MATE Ram 4GB
Debian - "If you can't apt install something, it isn't useful or doesn't exist"
My Giant Sources.list
Debian - "If you can't apt install something, it isn't useful or doesn't exist"
My Giant Sources.list
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
64-bit only currently, but runs fine on Wheezy.
MX Linux packager and developer
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: 2013-05-15 23:13
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
you had me right there, couldn't agree more.mardybear wrote:Can't even move the reload button to a preferred location.
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
Early pre-release of the Vivaldi browser is now available in both 32-bit and 64-bit. The flat UI sucks (as do they all), but it looks like it will present an interesting alternative for power users (which as always the target audience of the original Opera browser).stevepusser wrote:64-bit only currently, but runs fine on Wheezy.
Speaking of which: just to clarify, this browser originates with the folks who originally started Opera, back in the day; it is in no way related to the current Opera browser (a good thing, IMO).
- oswaldkelso
- df -h | grep > 20TiB
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: 2005-07-26 23:20
- Location: UK
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
vivaldi is freeware so not my cup of tea, but the opera troubles did spur another free browser that I use on Dragora. fifth-browser http://fifth-browser.sourceforge.net/ still alpha but functional, light. Well, certainly lighter than the big browsers. It's also fltk so suited Dragora-tiny (no-gtk/qt).
My main browser is Seamonkey I find the interface much nicer than iceweasel/icecat I use chatzilla so that's a bonus and the only addons are a fork/tweak of little-monkey theme https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/seamon ... seamonkey/ so it works with the latest version and tree-view for chatzilla https://github.com/hagabaka/chatzilla-p ... annel-tree.
I also tend to install Netsurf and Dillo built with enable ssl and links that I use with the -g option.
My main browser is Seamonkey I find the interface much nicer than iceweasel/icecat I use chatzilla so that's a bonus and the only addons are a fork/tweak of little-monkey theme https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/seamon ... seamonkey/ so it works with the latest version and tree-view for chatzilla https://github.com/hagabaka/chatzilla-p ... annel-tree.
I also tend to install Netsurf and Dillo built with enable ssl and links that I use with the -g option.
Free Software Matters
Ash init durbatulûk, ash init gimbatul,
Ash init thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
My oldest used PC: 1999 imac 333Mhz 256MB PPC abandoned by Debian
Ash init durbatulûk, ash init gimbatul,
Ash init thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
My oldest used PC: 1999 imac 333Mhz 256MB PPC abandoned by Debian
Re: alternative web browsers reflection...
I'm primarily a Chrome user (and Google user in general- Google Drive, Docs, etc. ) so that works well for me, but when I'm just surfing the web I like to use elinks. I know its a little (alot) more primitive then most people use, but it does have tabbed browsing, bookmarks, history, etc. Just no pictures/videos
Laptop: Debian GNU/Linux 9 'Stretch' 64bit
Read: https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian/
We are the Universal OS. Be patient, give help, teach the Debian way.
Read: https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian/
We are the Universal OS. Be patient, give help, teach the Debian way.