The first change is to udev, which will begin assigning predictable, stable names for network interfaces (in place of names using the ambiguous "eth0" form)
Like enp1s0 and wlp2s0 is all that much better. Haven't they got something better to do?
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
The future with Systemd
Re: The future with Systemd
Like enp1s0 and wlp2s0 is all that much better. Haven't they got something better to do?spacex(ew)
http://tweaklinux.org
http://tweaklinux.org
Re: The future with Systemd
The crystal ball says that the future of systemd will be whatever the community of developers and contributors think it will be. Most likely it will be the majority default init until a worthy alternative presents itself, and if that alternative gets enough support then other options will be presented.
Re: The future with Systemd
very good Daniel-san, you could have also picked runit, uselessd, openRC etc... dmd sounds interesting, but without the backing of enough people and distros it will remain a niche option.
Of course, it would be nice for Debian to offer those choices, but hey, sometimes we can only look at the cake and other times we can eat it.
Of course, it would be nice for Debian to offer those choices, but hey, sometimes we can only look at the cake and other times we can eat it.