Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Remote exploit vulnerability in bash

Here you can discuss every aspect of Debian. Note: not for support requests!
Message
Author

User avatar
Hallvor
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 2044
Joined: 2009-04-16 18:35
Location: Kristiansand, Norway
Has thanked: 151 times
Been thanked: 212 times

Re: Remote exploit vulnerability in bash

#32 Post by Hallvor »

It looks like many people are looking at the code at the moment. Problems get fixed. I think that is a good thing.

Edit: Another bash upgrade today.
[HowTo] Install and configure Debian bookworm
Debian 12 | KDE Plasma | ThinkPad T440s | 4 × Intel® Core™ i7-4600U CPU @ 2.10GHz | 12 GiB RAM | Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | 1 TB SSD

User avatar
dasein
Posts: 7680
Joined: 2011-03-04 01:06
Location: Terra Incantationum

Re: Remote exploit vulnerability in bash

#33 Post by dasein »

Hallvor wrote:It looks like many people are looking at the code at the moment. Problems get fixed. I think that is a good thing.
Agreed. It's still worrisome (at least to me) that the vulnerabilities are as deep as they seem to be. And the continuing proliferation of not-really-a-fix "fixes" means that the number of folks who think it's fixed when it really isn't is growing.

texbrew
Posts: 15
Joined: 2013-04-17 19:08

Re: Remote exploit vulnerability in bash

#34 Post by texbrew »

dasein wrote:
Hallvor wrote:It looks like many people are looking at the code at the moment. Problems get fixed. I think that is a good thing.
Agreed. It's still worrisome (at least to me) that the vulnerabilities are as deep as they seem to be. And the continuing proliferation of not-really-a-fix "fixes" means that the number of folks who think it's fixed when it really isn't is growing.
I guess count me among those who thought it was fixed... Will have to keep my ear to the ground on this one.

It is worrisome, but I'd still rather be running Debian linux over Windows any day. Don't know diddly about dash, but I guess that's an option.

tex

User avatar
koanhead
Posts: 109
Joined: 2013-06-20 16:54

Re: Remote exploit vulnerability in bash

#35 Post by koanhead »

I saw on debian-devel that Ian Jackson had proposed removing the ability for bash to functions from the environment. That would remove the entire class of vulnerability, at a cost of killing a feature that it seems like few people use, though I have no real data on that last. Using `bash -p` has a similar effect.

dash can't import functions from the environment AFAIK. It lacks a lot of bash's features (like history and completion) so it isn't a good choice for an interactive shell (at least not for me) but is good for your shell scripts as long as they don't rely on bashisms.

mikef5644
Posts: 1
Joined: 2014-10-01 23:47

Re: Remote exploit vulnerability in bash

#36 Post by mikef5644 »

The bash shellshock problem appears to have been fixed in wheezy and squeeze i386.

The debian squeeze armel version is commonly used in NAS boxes and network drives. It appears to install dash by default if it matters.

I'm using a TonidoPlug2, when I run sudo aptitude update
it displays lines like this:
Hit http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/main armel Packages

When I run sudo aptitude upgrade
it doesn't update bash.

~# cat /etc/issue
Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 \n \l

~# cat /etc/debian_version
6.0.10

~# cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.31.8-topkick1281p2-001-004-20101214 (andrew@localhost.localdomain) (gcc version 3.4.4 (release) (CodeSourcery ARM 2005q3-2)) #1 Thu Jun 16 10:06:20 CST 2011

Can we have the squeeze armel version patched as well.

User avatar
dilberts_left_nut
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 5347
Joined: 2009-10-05 07:54
Location: enzed
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 66 times

Re: Remote exploit vulnerability in bash

#37 Post by dilberts_left_nut »

Squeeze is EOL so won't be getting any (official) updates.
AFAIK squeeze-lts is i386/amd64 only.
AdrianTM wrote:There's no hacker in my grandma...

Post Reply