Because metaphorically, it's the software equivalent of an alien penetrating your brain and nervous system with numerous worm-like tentacles and operating your body and personality like you're a zombie being controlled by the Borg, and because the main dev little snot thinks the rest of the world should write their software around his beta $#1+, he's a f#%king little ladder climber that works for a corporation, desperately seeking fame and a name for himself. The only thing he's achieving is infamy for dividing the (LIBRE) Linux world and possibly bringing it to its knees. If you don't understand the tech aspects or the politics then maybe you're using the wrong distro and you're in the wrong forum, maybe Ubuntu might be better suited to you.Naron wrote:I do not understand why people hate so much systemd. There are objective (technical) arguments against systemd?
I'm a simple user, without any technical knowledge, but I feel, after I read the discussions from here, that the arguments against systemd are more emotional than technical.
I read what other people say about systemd and it does not seem so bad.
That's why I ask here.
Ya know, this disturbing trend started with Debian licking Canonical's feces exit orifice, now they're extending their tongue to Redhat, hence my new name for Debian, Redshat+Ewbuntu+Debian=REDBUNTIAN.