Not at all.tadaensylvermane wrote:as I understand it ppas are under a certain level of scrutiny.
http://askubuntu.com/questions/35629/ar ... tch-out-fo
IMO, Debian-Multimedia is far "safer" and more secure.
Not at all.tadaensylvermane wrote:as I understand it ppas are under a certain level of scrutiny.
QFTLinadian wrote:they should call it ETbuntu, since it likes to phone home so much.
Code: Select all
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM 'fonts.dtd'>
<fontconfig>
<!-- Hinting -->
<match target="font">
<edit mode="assign" name="hinting">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<!-- Hint Style -->
<match target="font">
<edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle">
<const>hintslight</const>
</edit>
</match>
<!-- Anti-aliasing -->
<match target="font">
<edit mode="assign" name="antialias">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
</fontconfig>
Good luck with that. Try ripping a blu-ray with anything else... on any OS.whatever makemkv does proabably[sic] can be done with some tool from Deb multimedia
Debian makes the difference between free and non-free clear for users. The Debian project is run in a much more democratic/transparent way and there is no BDFL figure bestowing shiny gifts and control upon the unwashed. Plus, there is the social contract. These are the reasons I use Debian and they are important.andyetanother wrote:Debian used to be a very different distribution back in the days of Debian 3,4,5, nowadays there's not much difference between Debian and the other derivatives - and in many cases the same people are working on them. This makes hating ubuntu while using Debian pretty silly.
bettylou wrote:Good luck with that. Try ripping a blu-ray with anything else... on any OS.whatever makemkv does proabably[sic] can be done with some tool from Deb multimedia
Where is that TL;DR line?Head_on_a_Stick wrote:https://skitterman.wordpress.com/2015/0 ... u-council/
And just how exactly do you see that happening considering the amount of GPL'd code involved?exploder wrote:I see Ubuntu becoming a proprietary distribution.