Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Iceweasel woes?

Here you can discuss every aspect of Debian. Note: not for support requests!
Message
Author
User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Iceweasel woes?

#31 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

Deshapria wrote:Most times I do that with Ubuntu ppas. Open them up and look in.
https://wiki.debian.org/CreatePackageFromPPA

Backporting stuff yourself is very simple and it only takes a few minutes.
deadbang

Deshapria
Posts: 50
Joined: 2015-07-19 08:36

Re: Iceweasel woes?

#32 Post by Deshapria »

mzsade wrote:Please tell us how it goes, i am still not intrepid enough to go beyond the release version. :-)
Writing from Iceweasel 41.0a2. Using it for a while. I had to install additionally libnss3_3.19.2-1 from http://pkgs.org/debian-sid/debian-main- ... 6.deb.html.

I have used Firefox Aurora before in my Xubuntu remix. Works very well. Iceweasel Aurora would work very well in Jessie too. I rebooted Jessie twice, and still there are no problems. :)

Here is a screenshot,
Image

User avatar
mzsade
Posts: 91
Joined: 2011-12-08 01:25

Re: Iceweasel woes?

#33 Post by mzsade »

Deshapria wrote:
mzsade wrote:Please tell us how it goes, i am still not intrepid enough to go beyond the release version. :-)
Writing from Iceweasel 41.0a2. Using it for a while. I had to install additionally libnss3_3.19.2-1 from http://pkgs.org/debian-sid/debian-main- ... 6.deb.html.

I have used Firefox Aurora before in my Xubuntu remix. Works very well. Iceweasel Aurora would work very well in Jessie too. I rebooted Jessie twice, and still there are no problems. :)
Funny thing; i added this, "deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ jessie-backports iceweasel-aurora" in addition to "deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ jessie-backports iceweasel" to my sources.list and did a "sudo apt-get update". Since i'd already done a "apt-get install -t jessie-backports iceweasel" for version 39.0 i thought i'd go to Synaptic and see if Aurora showed up separately. Instead it was just Iceweasel with a yellow star showing as upgradable. I realized it was because it was an Alpha version of the same package, applied the upgrade and tried it out. Sadly, this time i have to be the one to say that it did not make a whit of difference. As it did not make any sense to have 2 deb lines in my sourece.list for the same package i first Forced Version back to 39.0, then commented out the aurora line and did an apt-get update. That's 41.3 MB of bandwidth down the drain. :-(.

Lesson learned; all these newer versions mozilla comes up with periodically are just numbers, i seriously doubt they do any work on it and i do not expect anything earth shattering from the newer release version when it comes out. :|
Linux User #481272 Reg: 15th Sept., 2008

Deshapria
Posts: 50
Joined: 2015-07-19 08:36

Re: Iceweasel woes?

#34 Post by Deshapria »

mzsade wrote: Lesson learned; all these newer versions mozilla comes up with periodically are just numbers, i seriously doubt they do any work on it and i do not expect anything earth shattering from the newer release version when it comes out. :|
I suppose you are right. I don't see much difference, even though I am now using Iceweasel Aurora. :)

Post Reply