Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing?

Here you can discuss every aspect of Debian. Note: not for support requests!
Message
Author
User avatar
woteb
Posts: 124
Joined: 2009-01-24 09:51
Location: Netherlands (Veluwe)

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#31 Post by woteb »

Edbarx, I don't know what DE or WM you're using, but yesterday this (see below) helped me a lot with XFCE and a much larger (19") screen:

Ugly fonts in XFCE

1. Create a file local.fonts in /etc/font

Paste this content:

<match target="font">
<edit name="autohint" mode="assign">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
<edit name="hinting" mode="assign">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
<edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle">
<const>hintslight</const>
</edit>
<edit mode="assign" name="lcdfilter">
<const>lcddefault</const>
</edit>
</match>

Save this file.

2. Empty all XFCE files in ~/.cache/session

3. Create a file .Xresources in your home directory

Paste this content:
Xft.dpi: 96
Xft.antialias: true
Xft.hinting: true
Xft.rgba: rgb
Xft.autohint: false
Xft.hintstyle: hintslight
Xft.lcdfilter: lcddefault

Save this file.

4. Execute this command:
xrdb -merge ~/.Xresources

5. Log out and log in.

Perhaps this will help you any further. Now also Openbox looks much brighter and smoother.
Laptops: HP 250 G6 i3 7th gen + Lenovo: Debian Testing XFCE
HP based chromebooks: Debian Testing and other variations
"The simple reality of the matter is that Debian is essentially the backbone of Linux - for all practical purposes."

User avatar
Danielsan
Posts: 659
Joined: 2010-10-10 22:36
Has thanked: 5 times

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#32 Post by Danielsan »

Ehi... Did you remember the icon I made for Iceweasel?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8-C4a ... sp=sharing

Now I have to switch to the original Firefox icons set... :(
By the way why does nobody speak about Icecat?

I think it must be more reliable than Pale Moon, I had difficult to compile it trough Git so I would try with the OpenSuse builder.

User avatar
edbarx
Posts: 5401
Joined: 2007-07-18 06:19
Location: 35° 50 N, 14 º 35 E
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#33 Post by edbarx »

To Woteb:

I am using XFCE 4.10. The only problem I had with fonts was Palemoon's use of unsmoothed fonts which stressed my eyes' focusing muscles unneccessarily. I followed advice from Stevepusser who instructed to use "dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config". That presented me with a debconf TUI interface that asked me several questions about how I want my fonts rendered on my system as is apparently as systemwide setting. After following Stevepusser's advice my fonts are smoothed and not stressful on my eyes.

Again, I wish to thank you for taking your time to help me. I will add a window manager in case XFCE continues with its quest of welcoming more bloat. If fonts appear as I wish them in a window manager, that will be another option for a graphical interface that I can use. If not, I will use your instructions to setup font rendering the way I want it.

Again, many thanks.
Debian == { > 30, 000 packages }; Debian != systemd
The worst infection of all, is a false sense of security!
It is hard to get away from CLI tools.

User avatar
edbarx
Posts: 5401
Joined: 2007-07-18 06:19
Location: 35° 50 N, 14 º 35 E
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#34 Post by edbarx »

Danielsan wrote:Ehi... Did you remember the icon I made for Iceweasel?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8-C4a ... sp=sharing

Now I have to switch to the original Firefox icons set... :(
By the way why does nobody speak about Icecat?

I think it must be more reliable than Pale Moon, I had difficult to compile it trough Git so I would try with the OpenSuse builder.
Danielsan, I had the same impression the first time I used a precompiled Palemoon installation the link to which is unimportant since it evidently was not compiled for Debian/Devuan. However, after following Stevepusser's advice, I can now enjoy reliable websurfing that doesn't overload my system forcing my CPU fan to get into frequent fits of frenzy and an undue RAM consumption. My advice is to follow Stevepusser's advice as it has proven to be good advice: I am a witness to that. You can keep Chrome/Chromium and Iceweasel/Firefox for nasty websites that require a modern super-bloated web-browser whenever the need forces you to visit such sites.
Debian == { > 30, 000 packages }; Debian != systemd
The worst infection of all, is a false sense of security!
It is hard to get away from CLI tools.

Chiefahol
Posts: 30
Joined: 2015-08-27 11:39

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#35 Post by Chiefahol »

Iceweasel is Firefox.

Makes more sense if you call it what it is.

User avatar
edbarx
Posts: 5401
Joined: 2007-07-18 06:19
Location: 35° 50 N, 14 º 35 E
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#36 Post by edbarx »

Chiefahol wrote:Iceweasel is Firefox.

Makes more sense if you call it what it is.
Those who have been using Debian and Iceweasel know pretty well that Iceweasel WAS NOT Firefox. Maybe, the present Iceweasel is Firefox, but definitely the Iceweasel many users have been using for so many years does not have all the sluggishness and bloat that the current Iceweasel has. I and many others had to resort to alternatives so that we could continue to use our hardware. Users of extremely powerful hardware employing several processor cores together with a huge RAM and a GPU intended for gamers, cannot make a good comparison. Iceweasel was lean, fast and efficient on hardware; the current Iceweasel is Firefox with a different name.
Debian == { > 30, 000 packages }; Debian != systemd
The worst infection of all, is a false sense of security!
It is hard to get away from CLI tools.

User avatar
Nili
Posts: 441
Joined: 2014-04-30 14:04
Location: $HOME/♫♪
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#37 Post by Nili »

If I wouldn't have other alternative of choices, then i would been upset.

For quite some time I have been disappointed by the changes of Firefox since version 24.
In my opinion Iceweasel wasn't just a simple Firefox other name.
Last edited by Nili on 2016-07-06 19:33, edited 1 time in total.
openSUSE Tumbleweed KDE/Wayland

♫♪ Elisa playing...
Damascus Cocktail ♪ Black Reverie ♪ Dye the sky.

geekosupremo
Posts: 154
Joined: 2014-10-30 23:17

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#38 Post by geekosupremo »

Maybe it's my commercial software Stockholm Syndrom talking ... but what is it about Firefox post v. 24 that is so philosophically disturbing?

User avatar
Ardouos
Posts: 1077
Joined: 2013-11-03 00:30
Location: Elicoor II
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#39 Post by Ardouos »

geekosupremo wrote:Maybe it's my commercial software Stockholm Syndrom talking ... but what is it about Firefox post v. 24 that is so philosophically disturbing?
It just started receiving a lot of changes that people did not really like. Added bloat making it heavier and a change in the interface (australis).
There is only one Debian | Do not break Debian | Stability and Debian | Backports

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀

geekosupremo
Posts: 154
Joined: 2014-10-30 23:17

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#40 Post by geekosupremo »

Ardouos wrote:It just started receiving a lot of changes that people did not really like. Added bloat making it heavier and a change in the interface (australis).
Thanks for that. Coming to this "late" (about 8 months ago) I don't have the long memory of what Iceweasel was.

The Australis is contensious, even to me. I dislike it mostly because I have to remeber if I'm in Chrome or Firefox when just glancing at the interface. I understand why they did it ... I just not a huge fan.

User avatar
HuangLao
Posts: 485
Joined: 2015-01-27 01:31
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#41 Post by HuangLao »

One solution Seamonkey. Not in repos, but you can download the binary and run it with no problems from /home.

User avatar
MARKMENTAL
Posts: 22
Joined: 2016-03-31 21:01
Location: USA

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#42 Post by MARKMENTAL »

I use the Firefox 45 esr edition from Mozilla website it works great on Jessie and should be supported for a good while.

compute34ymk
Posts: 6
Joined: 2016-05-19 07:55

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#43 Post by compute34ymk »

Did mozilla offer GNU some sort of deal or what?
What happened to GNU saying firefox wasn't free and the firefox artwork?

User avatar
Ardouos
Posts: 1077
Joined: 2013-11-03 00:30
Location: Elicoor II
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#44 Post by Ardouos »

compute34ymk wrote:Did mozilla offer GNU some sort of deal or what?
What happened to GNU saying firefox wasn't free and the firefox artwork?
Mozilla Firefox was always GNU/ Free software, it is just now compatible with the DSFG.
There is only one Debian | Do not break Debian | Stability and Debian | Backports

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀

Güy
Posts: 7
Joined: 2015-12-13 00:17

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#45 Post by Güy »

I prefer the firefox icon. But speaking of browsers, the only thing I was sad about is that the x86 version of google-chrome was ended, so no more drm video streaming on those old machines.

User avatar
Ardouos
Posts: 1077
Joined: 2013-11-03 00:30
Location: Elicoor II
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#46 Post by Ardouos »

Firefox has now hit stable.

Iceweasel is now a transitional package.

RIP.

https://packages.debian.org/jessie/iceweasel

https://packages.debian.org/jessie/firefox-esr
There is only one Debian | Do not break Debian | Stability and Debian | Backports

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀

NoNoNo
Posts: 11
Joined: 2016-06-11 07:00

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#47 Post by NoNoNo »

Nevermind it.

I always miss Netscape Navigator.
OOh , Windows NT 6.1 is fading... (Should I panic now?)

Roel63
Posts: 571
Joined: 2009-07-02 18:18
Location: Breda (Netherlands)

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#48 Post by Roel63 »

Will Icedove still exist for a while?

User avatar
Ardouos
Posts: 1077
Joined: 2013-11-03 00:30
Location: Elicoor II
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#49 Post by Ardouos »

Roel63 wrote:Will Icedove still exist for a while?
Yes I presume so, until it is eol. Then Debian will get Thunderbird.

Edit:
Maybe not. https://packages.debian.org/sid/icedove

Edit 2:
Still Icedove, upgraded today receiving version 45.1

https://packages.debian.org/jessie/icedove
Last edited by Ardouos on 2016-06-14 20:02, edited 2 times in total.
There is only one Debian | Do not break Debian | Stability and Debian | Backports

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀

User avatar
HuangLao
Posts: 485
Joined: 2015-01-27 01:31
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Am I the only one that is sad that Iceweasel is changing

#50 Post by HuangLao »

NoNoNo wrote:Nevermind it.

I always miss Netscape Navigator.
It didn't go anywhere. :)
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

Post Reply