Debian User Forums

Posted: **2017-07-30 01:01**

https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/ ... ity-awards

Quote from article : " ...the lamest vendor response award went to Systemd supremo Lennart Poettering for his controversial, and perhaps questionable, handling of the following bugs in everyone's favorite init replacement: 5998, 6225, 6214, 5144, and 6237... "

Posted: **2017-07-30 05:19**

They're gonna need to retire that category

Posted: **2017-07-30 14:09**

LOL the comment section is on fire and funny as hell.

EDIT: Systemd is working as intended

Posted: **2017-07-30 15:04**

To exploit the issue, an attacker would have to convince an administrator – someone who already has root access – to install...

Posted: **2017-07-30 18:00**

Wow. Bikeshed into totally tangential irrelevancy within three replies.

Posted: **2017-07-30 18:01**

Wheelerof4te wrote:LOL the comment section is on fire and funny as hell.

Very first comment almost made me schnertz.

Posted: **2017-07-30 23:31**

Back in the days when Mono was considered a submarine way to give Microsoft control over Linux, there was such universal hate then.

Reply to This

This one truly got me

Maybe systemd needs more security-caring contributors (or someone that tells Pottering to be a little less "stubborn")

Debian User Forums

systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards

systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards

Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards

Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards

Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards

Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards

Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards

Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards