Debian based Distros... Really better?

Here you can discuss every aspect of Debian. Note: not for support requests!

Re: Debian based Distros... Really better?

Postby MALsPa » 2017-11-19 21:32

RU55EL wrote:So, Arch is no go for people who cannot read.

Can't or won't.
MALsPa
 
Posts: 621
Joined: 2007-12-07 19:20
Location: albuquerque

Re: Debian based Distros... Really better?

Postby kopper » 2017-11-21 13:53

MALsPa wrote:Can't or won't.


Isn't it effectively the same thing? :p
Debian 9.2 Stable with i3
Secure your stuff: Securing Debian Manual
Don't break your stuff: Source List Management DontBreakDebian
kopper
 
Posts: 79
Joined: 2016-09-30 14:30

Re: Debian based Distros... Really better?

Postby pylkko » 2017-11-21 15:02

It is indeed probably fair to say that the differences between Debian and derivatives (w.r.t to ease of use) have steadily diminished but not entirely disappeared.

Debian is also pretty strict with the licenses and with what can be accepted into it, which might not be true of derivatives. There are some packages that are present in many other distributions but not on Debian because they have some license problem. According to a post on Debian Planet, Debian even considers the JSON license "non-free" because it has the clause:
https://www.json.org/license.html wrote:The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.


I would not call Debian testing a "rolling release". It's more like a staging/testing area.
User avatar
pylkko
 
Posts: 1212
Joined: 2014-11-06 19:02

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

fashionable