Can't or won't.RU55EL wrote:So, Arch is no go for people who cannot read.
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Debian based Distros... Really better?
Re: Debian based Distros... Really better?
Re: Debian based Distros... Really better?
Isn't it effectively the same thing? :pMALsPa wrote:Can't or won't.
Debian 10.2 Stable with i3
Secure your stuff: Securing Debian Manual
Don't break your stuff: Source List Management DontBreakDebian
Secure your stuff: Securing Debian Manual
Don't break your stuff: Source List Management DontBreakDebian
Re: Debian based Distros... Really better?
It is indeed probably fair to say that the differences between Debian and derivatives (w.r.t to ease of use) have steadily diminished but not entirely disappeared.
Debian is also pretty strict with the licenses and with what can be accepted into it, which might not be true of derivatives. There are some packages that are present in many other distributions but not on Debian because they have some license problem. According to a post on Debian Planet, Debian even considers the JSON license "non-free" because it has the clause:
Debian is also pretty strict with the licenses and with what can be accepted into it, which might not be true of derivatives. There are some packages that are present in many other distributions but not on Debian because they have some license problem. According to a post on Debian Planet, Debian even considers the JSON license "non-free" because it has the clause:
I would not call Debian testing a "rolling release". It's more like a staging/testing area.https://www.json.org/license.html wrote:The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.