Debian User Forums

bester69 wrote:Ligher than firefox and chrome/ium, you can try it , it cost money to install it and compare with your others browsers,
Im really glad with opera, and im using it right now as my default browser, but you can do whatever you want, i just told you how good right now is back again Opera browser, a least in my old 2008's laptop.

If it doesn't relate to Debian, but you still want to share it, please do it here

RoyFokker wrote:I think linux has jumped the shark the last time I used Windows heavily. Due to my ongoing woes with Xorg documented here:
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php? ... 15#p630529

Nili wrote:

bester69 wrote:Ligher than firefox and chrome/ium, you can try it , it cost money to install it and compare with your others browsers,
Im really glad with opera, and im using it right now as my default browser, but you can do whatever you want, i just told you how good right now is back again Opera browser, a least in my old 2008's laptop.

I'm glad you're happy with Opera also i do not want to ruin your joy, but for some circumstances I can't test Opera right now.
So I asked more outputs from you.

bester69 wrote:

Nili wrote:

bester69 wrote:Ligher than firefox and chrome/ium, you can try it , it cost money to install it and compare with your others browsers,
Im really glad with opera, and im using it right now as my default browser, but you can do whatever you want, i just told you how good right now is back again Opera browser, a least in my old 2008's laptop.

I'm glad you're happy with Opera also i do not want to ruin your joy, but for some circumstances I can't test Opera right now.
So I asked more outputs from you.

Im really sorry man, im very lazy, but you should try it

Nili wrote:......
Which also means you accept their proprietary End Use License Agreement which " governs your download and/or use of the executable code " and "agree to be bound by all the terms and conditions set forth in this EULA thereby." Have fun!

bester69 wrote:

Nili wrote:......
Which also means you accept their proprietary End Use License Agreement which " governs your download and/or use of the executable code " and "agree to be bound by all the terms and conditions set forth in this EULA thereby." Have fun!

For sure, life is too complicate, work, women, family, friends, people, linux, society, banks , i cant stand with all of them , im 35 years old, and i need to RIP , im pretty tired, to me ive enought with money banks's EULA, so, in my case, its time to economize time and efforts, puttin them in the right measures.

I say, yes, yes, .. yes to everithing EULA's karma archons contracts, im not reading anymore agreements, fak!.

pcalvert wrote:I tried Opera for Windows and Linux and ended up dumping it. The Windows version I dumped because it updated itself automatically without asking for permission first. I don't clearly remember exactly why I got rid of the Linux version, but it might have been because it was too similar to Chrome/Chromium for my tastes.

If you like Opera, then you may like Vivaldi.

Phil

Midori's source code is freely available for anyone to download and modify, leading to active development and a diverse feature set.

kedaha wrote:How about the open-source midori-browser?
It's available from Debian and there's a newer version from jessie-backports. To quote from the website:

Midori's source code is freely available for anyone to download and modify, leading to active development and a diverse feature set.

Debian 8 includes several browser engines which are affected by a steady stream of security vulnerabilities. The high rate of vulnerabilities and partial lack of upstream support in the form of long term branches make it very difficult to support these browsers with backported security fixes. Additionally, library interdependencies make it impossible to update to newer upstream releases. Therefore, browsers built upon the webkit, qtwebkit and khtml engines are included in Jessie, but not covered by security support. These browsers should not be used against untrusted websites.

For general web browser use we recommend Iceweasel or Chromium.

Chromium - while built upon the Webkit codebase - is a leaf package, which will be kept up-to-date by rebuilding the current Chromium releases for stable. Iceweasel and Icedove will also be kept up-to-date by rebuilding the current ESR releases for stable.

bester69 wrote:

kedaha wrote:How about the open-source midori-browser?
It's available from Debian and there's a newer version from jessie-backports. To quote from the website:

Midori's source code is freely available for anyone to download and modify, leading to active development and a diverse feature set.

I tested Midori, it doesnt render propertly some web pages, so i gave it up.. those internet browsing doent worth it, they tend to crash or just doesnt render propertly some web pages, ..

I think in linux we just have
Firefox, Chrome/Chromium based on, and Opera browser

the rest are shitty browsers most of them (this include Midori and Pale moon among others).

Bugs
Have a problem or a suggestion? Report a bug on launchpad and watch it be vigilantly attacked and beaten into submission. or developed and drafted into the next release.

bester69 wrote:life is too complicate, work, women, family, friends, people, linux, society, banks , i cant stand with all of them , im 35 years old, and i need to RIP, im pretty tired, to me ive enought with money banks's EULA, so, in my case, its time to economize time and efforts, puttin them in the right measures.

debiman wrote:

bester69 wrote:life is too complicate, ... im 35 years old, and i need to RIP, im pretty tired

@everybody: forget it, op has their mind set on midless consumerism & closed source software. thankfully both are available on linux, too, these days.

No_windows wrote:I tried Midori once. Probably the version in Jessie. I can't recall if it was under Debian or SolydX, which uses the Debian repos. It crashed all the time.

I currently have Opera on my system, but don't use it very often. I've been debating on possibly uninstalling it. I don't like it that they've been sold, and they also seem to be updating a lot.....they'll post an update and a day or two later there is another. It makes me think that the first update wasn't the fix they thought it was. To be fair, I've never checked for any notices on what the updates were for.

Firefox no longer works with some versions of Windows XP
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/fi ... windows-xp

Windows XP with Service Pack 2 is the minimum Windows version that meets the Firefox System Requirements. ....

...

If it says Service Pack 1 or nothing at all, your system doesn't meet the Firefox system requirements. The only popular web browser that is still being updated with security patches for older versions of Windows XP is Opera.

...