Cyber attack spreads worldwide

If it doesn't relate to Debian, but you still want to share it, please do it here

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby edbarx » 2017-05-16 15:12

It is somewhat difficult to avoid the temptation to 'blame' Windows users for using their OS of preference. However, certain circumstances exist which force computer users to use it even though they may prefer something else. Students and users of specialised devices that connect to a computer, cannot always enjoy the freedom of software and OS choice. I can mention my recent experience when I purchased a USB oscilloscope that I couldn't use under Linux. Kernel developers are still unwilling to allow Windows drivers, notwithstanding they know a portion of hardware manufacturers, do not want to write open drivers or publish enough technical data. It seems kernel developers do not want to admit the hard reality, that hardware manufacturers are too powerful to be forced to do what they disagree with.

Someone may mention the ndiswrapper project which aims to use Windows XP Wifi drivers under Linux. Ndiswrapper does not provide support for all kinds of devices. My impression is, ndiswrapper is rather old software that was written when Linux Wifi drivers were difficult to find, but that is only my subjective impression.

EDIT: Edited for grammatical errors.
Last edited by edbarx on 2017-05-17 12:07, edited 1 time in total.
Debian == { > 30, 000 packages }; Debian != systemd
The worst infection of all, is a false sense of security!
It is hard to get away from CLI tools.
User avatar
edbarx
 
Posts: 5381
Joined: 2007-07-18 06:19
Location: 35° 50 N, 14 º 35 E

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby wizard10000 » 2017-05-16 15:23

phenest wrote:...It's not a claim. If you booted into Windows '95, DOS was demoted to a compatibility layer for 16bit drivers. That's a fact. Perhaps you can show me proof of YOUR claim that it was merely a GUI shell.


The first MS *desktop* OS that used a compatibility layer instead of sitting on top of DOS was Windows 2000. Win95, 98 and ME were all just GUI shells. WinNT-based OS use a compatibility layer; the first NT-based desktop OS was Win2k.

edit: Actually you'r'e both kinda correct. DOS was demoted *after* the shell loaded but was still required to boot. If you disable launching the shell what you're left with is DOS :wink:

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnew ... 0/?p=24063
we see things not as they are, but as we are.
-- anais nin
User avatar
wizard10000
 
Posts: 1111
Joined: 2011-05-09 20:02
Location: midwestern us

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby Bulkley » 2017-05-16 15:56

wizard10000 wrote:edit: Actually you'r'e both kinda correct. DOS was demoted *after* the shell loaded but was still required to boot. If you disable launching the shell what you're left with is DOS :wink:

However it worked, Windows 95 is what drove me to Linux. I was one of those users who played DOS, made my own config.sys, etc. The Win95 shell was an annoyance I never got over.

Back to the theme of this thread, Microsoft might like to blame the NSA and others but the reality is that most Windows installations are terribly insecure and that's a big problem for Microsoft. Windows can be toughened up but generally isn't.
Bulkley
 
Posts: 5192
Joined: 2006-02-11 18:35

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby wizard10000 » 2017-05-16 16:00

Bulkley wrote:However it worked, Windows 95 is what drove me to Linux.


Still OT, but that's what drove me to OS/2. Told the story before but I built this quad-boot monstrosity using a utility called System Commander that booted Win 3.1, a Win95 beta, OS/2 Warp and some Linux distribution - can't remember which.

Intellectual masturbation at its finest :mrgreen:

Okay, I'ma go sit down now. Please continue :)
we see things not as they are, but as we are.
-- anais nin
User avatar
wizard10000
 
Posts: 1111
Joined: 2011-05-09 20:02
Location: midwestern us

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby phenest » 2017-05-16 20:34

Bulkley wrote:Microsoft might like to blame the NSA and others but the reality is that most Windows installations are terribly insecure

There does seem to be some to and fro between NSA and MS and possibly nations that have been privy to the source code. It seems that, if the NSA found a vulnerability, they didn't tell MS unless it was a big problem for them, so the NSA only created patches for themselves. What's the point of all these extra eyeballs, if they're not willing to share with MS?
NEC Spirit 550 P4 3.8GHz HT - 2GB RAM - nVidia 7600GT - Pioneer BDR-209DBK
ASUS Sabertooth P67 i7 3770K - 32GB RAM - 2x nVidia 660GTX SLI'd
User avatar
phenest
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: 2010-03-09 09:38
Location: The Matrix

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby Job » 2017-05-16 20:46

I still believe that Linux is more secure than windows.
#aptitude install life
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stretch - Devuan - Jessie (Media Center, yes, believe it)
User avatar
Job
 
Posts: 760
Joined: 2006-12-30 20:20
Location: no clue

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby ruffwoof » 2017-05-16 22:44

n_hologram wrote:
ruffwoof wrote:One mindset accepts that risk and takes protective measures. The other mindset assumes safety where safety is far from assured.

I'm fairly certain this doesn't support the idea of running everything as root.

Puppy ... that runs everything as root (but can be set to run the likes of browsers etc as a restricted user) ...
Puppy boots in less than a minute, even in old PCs, and it does not require antivirus software. Administering Puppy is quick and minimal. With Puppy, you just have to take care of your data, which you can easily save to USB flash

It boots a pure read only system contained within a single compressed file (squashed filesystem) and runs everything in ram. If that file is loaded from a readonly CD/DVD (boot disc) and even if you were running a very old browser and as root to go to your bank web site (nowhere else beforehand) ... then that's pretty secure. Or if you booted and went to a virus riddled web site, your data remains out of harms way.

"If you are using the internet for a commercial transaction, use a Linux boot up disk - such as Ubuntu or some of the other flavours. Puppylinux is a nice small distribution that boots up fairly quickly.

"It gives you an operating system which is perfectly clean and operates only in the memory of the computer and is a perfectly safe way of doing internet banking," van der Graaf said.
Debian OldStable (Jessie MAIN only), jwm, pcmanfm --desktop, brightside hot corners (top left set to toggle show/hide desktop)
Acer Aspire M3201 (2GB), AMD Phenom X4, Nvidia GT8600
ruffwoof
 
Posts: 133
Joined: 2016-08-20 21:00

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby n_hologram » 2017-05-16 23:37

ruffwoof wrote:
n_hologram wrote:
ruffwoof wrote:One mindset accepts that risk and takes protective measures. The other mindset assumes safety where safety is far from assured.

I'm fairly certain this doesn't support the idea of running everything as root.

Puppy ... that runs everything as root (but can be set to run the likes of browsers etc as a restricted user) ...
Puppy boots in less than a minute, even in old PCs, and it does not require antivirus software. Administering Puppy is quick and minimal. With Puppy, you just have to take care of your data, which you can easily save to USB flash

It boots a pure read only system contained within a single compressed file (squashed filesystem) and runs everything in ram. If that file is loaded from a readonly CD/DVD (boot disc) and even if you were running a very old browser and as root to go to your bank web site (nowhere else beforehand) ... then that's pretty secure. Or if you booted and went to a virus riddled web site, your data remains out of harms way.

"If you are using the internet for a commercial transaction, use a Linux boot up disk - such as Ubuntu or some of the other flavours. Puppylinux is a nice small distribution that boots up fairly quickly.

"It gives you an operating system which is perfectly clean and operates only in the memory of the computer and is a perfectly safe way of doing internet banking," van der Graaf said.

If your argument comes down to "a read-only filesystem is more secure than a rw one," I'll bias towards your side. However, I speculate the logistics of running this type of system full-time, especially on an environment like a server.
bester69 wrote:There is nothing to install in linux, from time to time i go to google searching for something fresh to install in linux, but, there is nothing
n_hologram
 
Posts: 192
Joined: 2013-06-16 00:10

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby ruffwoof » 2017-05-17 00:34

n_hologram wrote:If your argument comes down to "a read-only filesystem is more secure than a rw one," I'll bias towards your side. However, I speculate the logistics of running this type of system full-time, especially on an environment like a server.

Pristine factory fresh installation, configured and cast to a read only device (DVD) and any subsequent reboot has the system back to pristine again. However I only know of cases of relatively small clusters/servers using Puppy Linux. The main focus is then the data protection/backup policies (together with test system preparation of any system updates (next read-only system DVD release)).

The limitation factor is primarily memory capacity, however swap can assist there.

Penetration, shutdown, purge swap, reboot ... pristine again. Contrast that with having to identify and isolate the problem.
Debian OldStable (Jessie MAIN only), jwm, pcmanfm --desktop, brightside hot corners (top left set to toggle show/hide desktop)
Acer Aspire M3201 (2GB), AMD Phenom X4, Nvidia GT8600
ruffwoof
 
Posts: 133
Joined: 2016-08-20 21:00

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby alan stone » 2017-06-14 06:34

Job wrote:I still believe that Linux is more secure than windows.

It depends who installs and maintains an installation: Linux Malware Infects Raspberry Pi Devices Making Them CryptoCurrency Mining Zombies
Debian GNU/Linux 8.9 (jessie)- 32 bit
wm: openbox

If you initiate coercion, force, violence to enforce your idea or theory, or if every single time it is applied to the real world it fails completely, your idea or theory sucks and is worthless.
User avatar
alan stone
 
Posts: 155
Joined: 2011-10-22 14:08
Location: In my body.

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby alan stone » 2017-06-15 12:43

Job wrote:I still believe that Linux is more secure than windows.

Security is a process, not a product. - Bruce Schneier
Debian GNU/Linux 8.9 (jessie)- 32 bit
wm: openbox

If you initiate coercion, force, violence to enforce your idea or theory, or if every single time it is applied to the real world it fails completely, your idea or theory sucks and is worthless.
User avatar
alan stone
 
Posts: 155
Joined: 2011-10-22 14:08
Location: In my body.

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby bester69 » 2017-06-15 13:08

alan stone wrote:
Job wrote:I still believe that Linux is more secure than windows.

Security is a process, not a product. - Bruce Schneier

Its both things, id say

I havent heard in life of anyone getting inffected in Android Systems (linux system), and there hundred of millons of users using Android, and installing thousands of differents apps in that system. I go to google news, and you cant find anything about security infecctions in android.

I always said linux is inmune to virus and malware, and for what i've seen the last five years, this is like that in real life.
User avatar
bester69
 
Posts: 843
Joined: 2015-04-02 13:15

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby /tmp » 2017-06-15 13:13

Lysander wrote:
VentGrey wrote:Apparently Linux systems are vulnerable too, in my compulsive paranoia I disabled root acc and set all my firewalls to high, and im scanning every 2 hours, I really don't want some ransomware here :shock:


Yes, on another forum one user said they were running Mint and they still got it, I don't know if that's true though. EDIT: Apparently it's not true, it was only written for Windows.



Fun fact: the world's largest retailer, Wal-Mart runs all of their systems off of XP to this day. "Too big to fail" doesn't work when you build your empire on dangerously insecure software.
Jessie | Intel I5-3380M | Dell Latitude e6530 Laptop | 4 GB RAM | Intel HD Graphics 4000




"To check for updates, you must first install an update for Windows Update."
User avatar
/tmp
 
Posts: 423
Joined: 2011-12-31 08:39
Location: GNU Userlands

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby sunrat » 2017-06-16 01:19

bester69 wrote:I havent heard in life of anyone getting inffected in Android Systems (linux system), and there hundred of millons of users using Android, and installing thousands of differents apps in that system. I go to google news, and you cant find anything about security infecctions in android.

Haha, Google News would be the last place to search for Android vulnerabilities. :D
http://thehackernews.com/2017/04/androi ... lware.html
https://www.startpage.com/do/search?q=a ... ui=english
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ”
Remember to BACKUP!
User avatar
sunrat
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Cyber attack spreads worldwide

Postby alan stone » 2017-06-16 19:33

bester69 wrote:I go to google news, and you cant find anything about security infecctions in android.

Fascinating.
Debian GNU/Linux 8.9 (jessie)- 32 bit
wm: openbox

If you initiate coercion, force, violence to enforce your idea or theory, or if every single time it is applied to the real world it fails completely, your idea or theory sucks and is worthless.
User avatar
alan stone
 
Posts: 155
Joined: 2011-10-22 14:08
Location: In my body.

PreviousNext

Return to Offtopic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

fashionable