Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
"A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Debian
- /tmp
- Posts: 426
- Joined: 2011-12-31 08:39
- Location: GNU Userlands
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 3 times
"A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Debian
I'm interested in helping my girlfriend found a non-profit group to help children and I want to use Free Software as the foundation of said group for philosophical reasons. Our goal is to restore laptops for, say, autistic or special needs children to use for school work and I will be running it on a server and a workstation for generating multimedia for said group (an oggcast, for example, or videos for conferences).
With that being said is it better to work within the system of Debian GNU/Linux or pour efforts into a fork like Devuan?
I'm not thrilled with the idea of one program to rule them all approach to software design. Concurrently, the elitist attitudes of the "Veteran Unix Admins" mindset as espoused by this article from Info World seems counterproductive towards creating a solid foundation of cooperation. After all, why would people opt out of one tyrant (Lennart) for the smugness of another?
Note: Regarding the previous term in the title; I'm coming off of reading some books on the period and thought the use of the term made sense. In hindsight I realize that that may have come across differently than intended and for that I apologize.
Edit: Added link for the Info World article I reference later
With that being said is it better to work within the system of Debian GNU/Linux or pour efforts into a fork like Devuan?
I'm not thrilled with the idea of one program to rule them all approach to software design. Concurrently, the elitist attitudes of the "Veteran Unix Admins" mindset as espoused by this article from Info World seems counterproductive towards creating a solid foundation of cooperation. After all, why would people opt out of one tyrant (Lennart) for the smugness of another?
Note: Regarding the previous term in the title; I'm coming off of reading some books on the period and thought the use of the term made sense. In hindsight I realize that that may have come across differently than intended and for that I apologize.
Edit: Added link for the Info World article I reference later
Last edited by /tmp on 2017-08-03 15:46, edited 3 times in total.
Bookworm | Intel I7-3667U | Apple Macbook Air 5,2 (Mid 2012) (Laptop) | 8 GB RAM | 3rd Gen Intel Core Graphics
"A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Debian
The correct answer is: (E) None of the above./tmp wrote:With that being said is it better to work within the system of Debian GNU/Linux or pour efforts into a fork like Devuan?
If your effort is distro-specific, then it's already a failure. After all, aren't you the one arguing against "elitism"? An attitude of "Only one distro, and no others" strikes me as the epitome of the arrogance you seem to decry.
Then too, the main difference between the two distros you mention is systemd. Are you planning on making your stuff init-system dependent? Not exactly in the spirit you seem to be advocating.
Distro-agnosticism is the way to go.
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: 2015-08-30 20:14
"A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Debian
I don't like that term, "balkanization". As someone who comes from that country which suffered from the division sown by others, I find it inappropriate. "Breaking up" would be correct wording.
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
"A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Debian
Why limit your self to just considering Linux distros ?
"A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Debian
No reason why the server and the workstation shouldn't both run stable Debian keeping administrative efforts to a minimum. Best to use what you already know in my opinion./tmp wrote: Our goal is to restore laptops for, say, autistic or special needs children to use for school work and I will be running it on a server and a workstation for generating multimedia for said group (an oggcast, for example, or videos for conferences).
With that being said is it better to work within the system of Debian GNU/Linux or pour efforts into a fork like Devuan?
As for restoring laptops—which you probably know how to do anyway—it's a good idea to change the heat sink thermal paste, blow out any dust with compressed air, specially from the ventilator and change the bios battery and install a system; I suggest you look at skolelinux It's also a good idea to try, if you can, to get additional memory for old laptops.
Each to his own but, if you found a non-profit group you'll have enough on your plate as it is, so maybe it's best to be pragmatic rather than philosophical and stick to Debian using, if possible, entirely Free Software./tmp wrote:I'm not thrilled with the idea of one program to rule them all approach to software design. Concurrently, the elitist attitudes of the "Veteran Unix Admins" mindset seems counterproductive towards creating a solid foundation of cooperation. After all, why would people opt out of one tyrant (Lennart) for the smugness of another?
DebianStable
Code: Select all
$ vrms
No non-free or contrib packages installed on debian! rms would be proud.
"A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Debian
So how did you come to that conclusion? I see you just registered to the forum today but maybe have been lurking? If so, for how long and where - forum, dng, irc? I have been in Devuan since day one and have connected with the friendliest most giving collection of individuals I've ever run across in my 75 years./tmp wrote:Concurrently, the elitist attitudes of the "Veteran Unix Admins" mindset seems counterproductive towards creating a solid foundation of cooperation. After all, why would people opt out of one tyrant (Lennart) for the smugness of another?
May the FORK be with you!
"A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Debian
^the truthdasein wrote:Distro-agnosticism is the way to go.
"A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Debian
Init agnosticism is too.MALsPa wrote:^the truthdasein wrote:Distro-agnosticism is the way to go.
(but easier said than done . . .)
May the FORK be with you!
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
i'm not exactly sure...
what is "Distro-agnosticism" supposed to be? LFS?
what is "Distro-agnosticism" supposed to be? LFS?
- /tmp
- Posts: 426
- Joined: 2011-12-31 08:39
- Location: GNU Userlands
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
I disagree. I'm planning for vertical and horizontal scaling. By focusing on hardware compatibility for software this makes scaling less time and cost intensive in the long run.dasein wrote:The correct answer is: (E) None of the above./tmp wrote:With that being said is it better to work within the system of Debian GNU/Linux or pour efforts into a fork like Devuan?
If your effort is distro-specific, then it's already a failure.
I'm focusing on the balance of stability, usability and the ethics of Free Software. By having the infrastructure based on a single distribution yet still adhering to Free Software principles this helps with minimizing support issues in the long run.dasein wrote:An attitude of "Only one distro, and no others" strikes me as the epitome of the arrogance you seem to decry.
I'm focusing on making the system independent of systemd. I'm not impressed with the rollout of systemd, the lackluster responses to bug reports and other brush fires which have cropped up since the launch of such an important aspect of an operating system. I see it as a serious downward trend and do not want to base logistical decisions off of the arbitrary and capricious decisions of Red Hat's engineering team.dasein wrote:Then too, the main difference between the two distros you mention is systemd. Are you planning on making your stuff init-system dependent? Not exactly in the spirit you seem to be advocating.
Bookworm | Intel I7-3667U | Apple Macbook Air 5,2 (Mid 2012) (Laptop) | 8 GB RAM | 3rd Gen Intel Core Graphics
- /tmp
- Posts: 426
- Joined: 2011-12-31 08:39
- Location: GNU Userlands
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
I was referencing an article from InfoWorld that was circulating with the announcement.golinux wrote:So how did you come to that conclusion? I see you just registered to the forum today but maybe have been lurking? If so, for how long and where - forum, dng, irc? I have been in Devuan since day one and have connected with the friendliest most giving collection of individuals I've ever run across in my 75 years./tmp wrote:Concurrently, the elitist attitudes of the "Veteran Unix Admins" mindset seems counterproductive towards creating a solid foundation of cooperation. After all, why would people opt out of one tyrant (Lennart) for the smugness of another?
Hardware support; I've been extremely impressed by how Debian GNU/Linux is able to handle darn near every type of hardware I can throw at it using free drivers. I've tried, say, FreeBSD on the same machines with mixed results. So at this point I'm going with Debian GNU/Linux.GarryRicketson wrote:Why limit your self to just considering Linux distros ?
Bookworm | Intel I7-3667U | Apple Macbook Air 5,2 (Mid 2012) (Laptop) | 8 GB RAM | 3rd Gen Intel Core Graphics
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
Sounds like you made up your mind long ago. Mkes one wonder why you posted./tmp wrote:I disagree. I'm planning for vertical and horizontal scaling. By focusing on hardware compatibility for software this makes scaling less time and cost intensive in the long run.dasein wrote:If your effort is distro-specific, then it's already a failure.
Outta here.
- /tmp
- Posts: 426
- Joined: 2011-12-31 08:39
- Location: GNU Userlands
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
That's a strawman argument. The only thing I'm set on is finding a Free Software system that is stable towards long-term use.dasein wrote:Sounds like you made up your mind long ago. Mkes one wonder why you posted./tmp wrote:I disagree. I'm planning for vertical and horizontal scaling. By focusing on hardware compatibility for software this makes scaling less time and cost intensive in the long run.dasein wrote:If your effort is distro-specific, then it's already a failure.
Outta here.
Immediately trusting in a fork without thinking of long-term stability is foolish.
Bookworm | Intel I7-3667U | Apple Macbook Air 5,2 (Mid 2012) (Laptop) | 8 GB RAM | 3rd Gen Intel Core Graphics
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: 2016-07-13 08:40
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
+1Wheelerof4te wrote:I don't like that term, "balkanization". As someone who comes from that country which suffered from the division sown by others, I find it inappropriate. "Breaking up" would be correct wording.
Also from the Balkans here and that expression is rather belittling of the conflicts in question, as they suggest the people just split up and made war for the kicks of it.
Anyway, IMHO there is no "house divided". If you're raising/educating children, I think it would be prudent to raise them in such a manner that open source software also means that different people have differing opinions about how software should function. That's all there is to it. This is not a war where you have to teach children to hate Poettering/Red Hat or the so called Veteran Unix Admins. Tell them to be mature about it and just realise that free software brings the freedom they want because they can always look at the software and code their own thing if they have the knowledge. Please don't give into the urges of reactionary powers within the community to spread bogeyman images and conspiracy theories. This is just heavily toxic. There is no break up of Debian. It's a working distro used by millions of people. The "Exodus", as the reactionary forces -- some of which still oddly enough lurk here -- called it, never happened in the degree to which they proclaim it. There is a sizable minority of people who went on to use Devuan and some of them also contribute to the distro. Good for them! And good luck to them as well!
Install whatever you like and then show the students other distros in a VM. Teach them the basics, they will figure out the rest... or they won't. But please don't bring them into this unnecessarily toxic environment of conspiracy theory bullshit and bile.
Debian GNU/Linux 9 Stretch w/Openbox
Acer Aspire E5-521G
AMD A8-6410 APU
4 GB RAM
integrated AMD Mullins
dedicated AMD Hainan Radeon R5 M240 2 GB
240 GB Toshiba Q300 SSD
Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 ethernet
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 wireless
Acer Aspire E5-521G
AMD A8-6410 APU
4 GB RAM
integrated AMD Mullins
dedicated AMD Hainan Radeon R5 M240 2 GB
240 GB Toshiba Q300 SSD
Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 ethernet
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 wireless
- /tmp
- Posts: 426
- Joined: 2011-12-31 08:39
- Location: GNU Userlands
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
Agreed; that's why I'm educating about the Free Software v Open Source philosophies and allowing them to decide what they want to do from there. My preferred philosophy is Free Software but I also educate about Open Source, its merits and shortcomings (e.g. "Tivoization").deborah-and-ian wrote:Anyway, IMHO there is no "house divided". If you're raising/educating children, I think it would be prudent to raise them in such a manner that open source software also means that different people have differing opinions about how software should function.
My dislike of the "Veteran Unix Admins" has to do with the Network World article's citations of what constitutes a "good admin." As someone whom works with end users directly it is incredibly insulting to immediately assume that it's always the end user's fault for an issue, or no "true" admin uses anything other than vi. My quarrel is with the idea of using the ideas espoused in said article as the cornerstone of a new system.
My issue is not with Devuan or its users; my issue is with finding a stable foundation from which to build an IT infrastructure. I'm interested in seeing where Devuan leads and in a completely non-Debian direction by way of GuixSD.deborah-and-ian wrote:There is a sizable minority of people who went on to use Devuan and some of them also contribute to the distro. Good for them! And good luck to them as well!
Bookworm | Intel I7-3667U | Apple Macbook Air 5,2 (Mid 2012) (Laptop) | 8 GB RAM | 3rd Gen Intel Core Graphics
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
Could you please post a link to the Network World article that you have referenced several times? (It's always good to include sources of information.) I think that I have seen the list that you are talking about but can't remember it being associated with Devuan. I'll be happy to search the archives and let you know what I find./tmp wrote:My dislike of the "Veteran Unix Admins" has to do with the Network World article's citations of what constitutes a "good admin." As someone whom works with end users directly it is incredibly insulting to immediately assume that it's always the end user's fault for an issue, or no "true" admin uses anything other than vi. My quarrel is with the idea of using the ideas espoused in said article as the cornerstone of a new system.
BTW I am the last thing from being a 'VUA' - mostly a desktop GuiGirl - and that has not been an impediment to my use of or extensive involvement with Devuan.
May the FORK be with you!
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
Golinux, let me try to help clarify a couple of points. But first, you have to be able to "decode" what passes for logic in the OP's mind.
What he's saying is something along these lines (paraphrasing):
tl;dr: Just another systemd troll thread. Nothing to see here. Please move along.
What he's saying is something along these lines (paraphrasing):
Clearer now is it?I don't like the traits attributed to a particular group by a particular author in a particular article, and I'm using that as a justification for a pig-headed prejudice that has absolutely no basis in, y'know, reality.
Whatever you do...
1) don't take notice of the fact that this is merely one person's "take" on the group in question; treat the contents of the article as immutable fact, along the lines of Newton's Laws.
2) don't take notice of the fact that this article was written years before Devuan was even formed/forked. So even if the article in question were carved in stone by the firey finger of the divine, it absolutely does not apply to the question as posed.
3) do not, do NOT, DO not notice that my "question" isn't a question at all. It's 100% pure troll-bait and this thread should be allowed to die off as quickly as possible.
tl;dr: Just another systemd troll thread. Nothing to see here. Please move along.
Last edited by dasein on 2017-08-03 16:55, edited 1 time in total.
- /tmp
- Posts: 426
- Joined: 2011-12-31 08:39
- Location: GNU Userlands
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
Sure! Here's the article in question.golinux wrote:Could you please post a link to the Network World article that you have referenced several times? (It's always good to include sources of information.) I think that I have seen the list that you are talking about but can't remember it being associated with Devuan. I'll be happy to search the archives and let you know what I find./tmp wrote:My dislike of the "Veteran Unix Admins" has to do with the Network World article's citations of what constitutes a "good admin." As someone whom works with end users directly it is incredibly insulting to immediately assume that it's always the end user's fault for an issue, or no "true" admin uses anything other than vi. My quarrel is with the idea of using the ideas espoused in said article as the cornerstone of a new system.
BTW I am the last thing from being a 'VUA' - mostly a desktop GuiGirl - and that has not been an impediment to my use of or extensive involvement with Devuan.
Bookworm | Intel I7-3667U | Apple Macbook Air 5,2 (Mid 2012) (Laptop) | 8 GB RAM | 3rd Gen Intel Core Graphics
- /tmp
- Posts: 426
- Joined: 2011-12-31 08:39
- Location: GNU Userlands
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
The thread title is in reference to me not breaking up the technical infrastructure of a proposed non-profit as I would prefer to keep a unified Free Software foundation for the whole of the effort.dasein wrote: tl;dr: Just another systemd troll thread. Nothing to see here. Please move along.
Bookworm | Intel I7-3667U | Apple Macbook Air 5,2 (Mid 2012) (Laptop) | 8 GB RAM | 3rd Gen Intel Core Graphics
Re: "A House Divided...": Preventing the breaking up of Deb
And what ties that article to Devuan? In fact the footnote says:/tmp wrote:Sure! Here's the article in question.golinux wrote:Could you please post a link to the Network World article that you have referenced several times?/tmp wrote:My dislike of the "Veteran Unix Admins" has to do with the Network World article's citations of what constitutes a "good admin."
And that was in 2011 long before the fork when we were all happily using Debian. I always saw it as tongue-in-cheek satire. Maybe your reading comprehension needs a upgrade . . .This story, "Nine traits of the veteran Unix admin," was originally published at InfoWorld.com.
May the FORK be with you!