Re: Lightweight browser for older PC's?
Posted: 2017-09-19 16:05
ein bild sagt mehr als tausend worte...Gaius wrote:
They aren't being "dicks", they're having a bit of fun. If you take the time to read more of bester69's threads, you'd find that the OP doesn't mind a bit of criticism and comes here to have fun too. I wouldn't be at all surprised if bester69 is chuckling too. After all, this is the Offtopic Forum.THX1138b wrote:I don't know why there are some people in this thread being dicks instead of suggesting lightweight browsers.
One should certainly hope so.Thorny wrote:I wouldn't be at all surprised if bester69 is chuckling too.
... has already been mentioned twice in this thread. before you.THX1138b wrote:I don't know why there are some people in this thread being dicks instead of suggesting lightweight browsers. Qupzilla ...
Yes but when more people mention the same solution it lends more credence to that solution.debiman wrote:... has already been mentioned twice in this thread. before you.THX1138b wrote:I don't know why there are some people in this thread being dicks instead of suggesting lightweight browsers. Qupzilla ...
yee-hah!
Try SeaMonkey (currently based on Firefox 51.0) and Slimjet (based on Chromium).bester69 wrote:I need something like a firefox/chromium browser based on, with a stucked older engine whose develop is based on security updates and optimal performance. Something like a LTS older version of firefox/chromium with just security updates. I meant with each new update, internet browsers need more CPU and RAM, and in older computer they are not workable anymore.