Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Linux use when RAM amounted to a few Megabytes.

Off-Topic discussions about science, technology, and non Debian specific topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
edbarx
Posts: 5401
Joined: 2007-07-18 06:19
Location: 35° 50 N, 14 º 35 E
Been thanked: 2 times

Linux use when RAM amounted to a few Megabytes.

#1 Post by edbarx »

Since I never used Linux when RAM was very costly and limited to only a few tens of megabytes, I would like to ask those who used Linux during those times. I remember MS Windows was 'slow' and used disk swapping very heavily making applications take quite a noticeable time to load.

Did old Linux suffer from heavy use of disk swapping?
Debian == { > 30, 000 packages }; Debian != systemd
The worst infection of all, is a false sense of security!
It is hard to get away from CLI tools.

reinob
Posts: 1189
Joined: 2014-06-30 11:42
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Linux use when RAM amounted to a few Megabytes.

#2 Post by reinob »

@edbarx,

The question is too vague to answer. I used Linux (Slackware) when the kernel was still 1.x on a 486 with 4MB (later upgraded to 16MB). Swap was the then-recommended 2-3x physical RAM.

With normal use (pine, emacs, etc. on the VT) and even using X (I used twm and fvwm -- GNOME and KDE didn't exist at that time..) it worked quite OK.

I didn't use Netscape though. It wasn't that practical until I got DSL (much later). Did pine with fetchmail (POP3, then offline), ftp, and lynx if something from the Web was necessary..

Cheers.

steve_v
df -h | grep > 20TiB
df -h | grep > 20TiB
Posts: 1400
Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
Location: /dev/chair
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Re: Linux use when RAM amounted to a few Megabytes.

#3 Post by steve_v »

1st GNU/Linux box: Slackware on a 486 DX4/120, 21MB RAM.
No swapping, so long as one did not run X. If I did run X, it was solely for Nutscrape... Err, Netscrap... That GUI web browser thing. For everything else there was the console and SVGALib.
X was a PITA due to my oddball Cirrus Logic VLB video card anyway. Silly games with memory holes and colour depth, IIRC.

Slowest GNU/Linux box: FreeSCO on a 486 DX2/66, 12MB RAM. No cache, for added slowness. 80MB HDD holding FDD boot images. I still have this machine, and it still works perfectly.
Last edited by steve_v on 2018-03-09 06:05, edited 1 time in total.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.

Bulkley
Posts: 6383
Joined: 2006-02-11 18:35
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Linux use when RAM amounted to a few Megabytes.

#4 Post by Bulkley »

What I remember was that Linux had to be installed with six, seven or more partitions. It was almost an art form getting the partitions just right.

I also remember using Gopher to scoot around the world. Speed on dial-up modems was slow but connections were reasonably quick because data was so limited. Pictures were rare. There was no advertising. Anyone who tried to commercialize the Internet was hit with DOS attacks.

My first Linux, Caldera, came on a single 3 1/2" floppy from the back of a magazine. To this day I have a hard time understanding why distros come so fat they won't fit on a CD.

steve_v
df -h | grep > 20TiB
df -h | grep > 20TiB
Posts: 1400
Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
Location: /dev/chair
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Re: Linux use when RAM amounted to a few Megabytes.

#5 Post by steve_v »

Bulkley wrote:Speed on dial-up modems was slow but connections were reasonably quick because data was so limited. Pictures were rare. There was no advertising.
The internet obesity epidemic is real. Try loading a "modern" javascript & advertising infested web page on a machine with <128MB RAM. Frankly, it's ridiculous, none of the bloat is useful data at all.
I actually tried this recently, a 486 running OS/2 Warp, with 24MB RAM, a 33.6K connection and Firefox 1.0. The result was not pretty. Links is still usable, because it doesn't even try to parse most of the bloat. Gopher is better still, though there's not much there these days.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.

User avatar
edbarx
Posts: 5401
Joined: 2007-07-18 06:19
Location: 35° 50 N, 14 º 35 E
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Linux use when RAM amounted to a few Megabytes.

#6 Post by edbarx »

reinob wrote:@edbarx,

The question is too vague to answer.
Well, others had no problem understanding it.
Debian == { > 30, 000 packages }; Debian != systemd
The worst infection of all, is a false sense of security!
It is hard to get away from CLI tools.

Post Reply