Of course it is leftist agenda.None1975 wrote:You think that BBC is from left wing, and maybe you think that UK is a socialist country? This is the greatest nonsense that I've read. BBC reflects the interests of capitalists. Neither more nor less.Lysander wrote:The BBC has a highly left wing agenda, and a browse of its News site for more than five minutes will make this exceedingly obvious.
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Cambridge Analytica
Re: Cambridge Analytica
- None1975
- df -h | participant
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
- Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
Re: Cambridge Analytica
They are all from one camp-from the capitalist camp. Even more. I call them the custodians of the current formation.Wheelerof4te wrote:[quote="None1975"Neo-liberals and neo-cons appeared to be rivals, but they worked hand-in-hand for decades.
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
- None1975
- df -h | participant
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
- Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
Re: Cambridge Analytica
Maybe....pawRoot wrote:Of course it is leftist agenda.
In politics, people have always been, and always will be, victims of naive deception and deprivation until they learn about any moral, religious, political, social phrases, statements, promises of seeing the interests of one or another class. Defenders of the old order will always bump up the advocates of reform and improvement until they understand that each old institution, whatever its inhuman and rotten character, is in the control of one or other dominant class forces.
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
- oswaldkelso
- df -h | grep > 20TiB
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: 2005-07-26 23:20
- Location: UK
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 60 times
Re: Cambridge Analytica
The BBC trust funded an independent study to see if there was any political bias in the BBC.
Overall across all it's services it was found to have right-wing bias. Feel free to read it and make your own minds up.
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/ass ... alysis.pdf
Overall across all it's services it was found to have right-wing bias. Feel free to read it and make your own minds up.
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/ass ... alysis.pdf
Free Software Matters
Ash init durbatulûk, ash init gimbatul,
Ash init thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
My oldest used PC: 1999 imac 333Mhz 256MB PPC abandoned by Debian
Ash init durbatulûk, ash init gimbatul,
Ash init thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
My oldest used PC: 1999 imac 333Mhz 256MB PPC abandoned by Debian
-
- Posts: 459
- Joined: 2013-06-16 00:10
Re: Cambridge Analytica
Whatever its bias, it's still a breath of fresh air compared to American demagogues like Fox and CNN (not even going to catalog the laundry list of online "news" sites).oswaldkelso wrote:The BBC trust funded an independent study to see if there was any political bias in the BBC.
Overall across all it's services it was found to have right-wing bias. Feel free to read it and make your own minds up.
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/ass ... alysis.pdf
the crunkbong project: scripts, operating system, the list goes on...bester69 wrote:There is nothing to install in linux, from time to time i go to google searching for something fresh to install in linux, but, there is nothing
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: 2015-08-30 20:14
Re: Cambridge Analytica
Elon Musk just deleted the Facebook pages for Tesla and SpaceX:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/977209817012977665
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/977209817012977665
Re: Cambridge Analytica
You may be confusing neo-liberals with libertarians. Neo-liberal is an economic term; think greed. Neo-cons are basically social conservatives. Libertarians do want maximum freedom and very little responsibility. These are generalities and not perfect.Wheelerof4te wrote:It reflects the interests of neo-liberals, which is a common name given to people who believe in maximum individual freedoms, and money above else.None1975 wrote:BBC reflects the interests of capitalists. Neither more nor less.
Personally, I want freedom to run Linux and set up my computer the way I like it.
Re: Cambridge Analytica
If Clinton were now the President in the White House and Cameron had won the referendum and the UK were heading for full integration in the European Union, no one would give a damn about Cambridge Analytica or the Russians or whoever. The other lot, the Open Society Foundations inter alia, would have full sway. Cambridge Analytica is now being cracked up to have played a decisive role in both the election of Trump and Brexit to cast aspersions on both.
DebianStable
Code: Select all
$ vrms
No non-free or contrib packages installed on debian! rms would be proud.
Re: Cambridge Analytica
oswaldkelso wrote:The BBC trust funded an independent study to see if there was any political bias in the BBC.
Overall across all it's services it was found to have right-wing bias. Feel free to read it and make your own minds up.
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/ass ... alysis.pdf
- alan stone
- Posts: 269
- Joined: 2011-10-22 14:08
- Location: In my body.
Re: Cambridge Analytica
One small step for a small man (*): deleting the FB account and app, as well as from similar companies.Wheelerof4te wrote:Elon Musk just deleted the Facebook pages for Tesla and SpaceX:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/977209817012977665
On big step for man-kind would be to delete the company, as well as similar companies.
It's showtime!: part 1, part 2.
(*) He's part of the predatory and crony capitalist gang.
Re: Cambridge Analytica
when i revealed the actual radio stations i'm listening to, i already knew it would only throw fuel on offtopic discussions.
interestingly nobody
a) commented on deutschlandfunk which i listed first for a reason
b) remembered that my whole point was: get news from more than just one source
i am sorry i cannot say more about those american stations; i got the streaming links from the Xiph directory, and they seem to be filling up empty time with streams from other stations, it's all very confusing.
anyhow, it all sounds like some people are trying to say "because you listen to the wrong station, this didn't actually happen" which i think is complete bullshit. if you want to discuss the political agendas of various online news sources, please open a new thread for that, it has very little to do with the topic at hand.
and btw, this topic is NOT about trump. most of the news coverage i heard & saw clearly states that Cambridge Analytica were involved in several elections in several countries & continents, for many years. which is a big part of the continuing outrage.
also i apologize to US american citizens: i am very interested when congress passes a law that further hampers your online freedom, and i know that indirectly this concerns me too, but ultimately
a) i cannot do anything about it (no really, i cannot sign a petition via eff.org)
b) i pay more attention to what happens in the EU
interestingly nobody
a) commented on deutschlandfunk which i listed first for a reason
b) remembered that my whole point was: get news from more than just one source
i am sorry i cannot say more about those american stations; i got the streaming links from the Xiph directory, and they seem to be filling up empty time with streams from other stations, it's all very confusing.
anyhow, it all sounds like some people are trying to say "because you listen to the wrong station, this didn't actually happen" which i think is complete bullshit. if you want to discuss the political agendas of various online news sources, please open a new thread for that, it has very little to do with the topic at hand.
and btw, this topic is NOT about trump. most of the news coverage i heard & saw clearly states that Cambridge Analytica were involved in several elections in several countries & continents, for many years. which is a big part of the continuing outrage.
also i apologize to US american citizens: i am very interested when congress passes a law that further hampers your online freedom, and i know that indirectly this concerns me too, but ultimately
a) i cannot do anything about it (no really, i cannot sign a petition via eff.org)
b) i pay more attention to what happens in the EU
Re: Cambridge Analytica
I've done the same for years, the importance of reading around was recommended to me by an ex-girlfriend [a staunch Communist even though I considered myself right wing at the time, we had interesting 'discussions']. She worded it, "it's important to know what the other side is saying". I now read the BBC, the Telegraph, Takimag, the Guardian, Al Jazeera and Worker's Hammer [they give it away outside my uni] among others. I then draw my own conclusions. I find that people who read only one source have a very skewed view of the world.debiman wrote: b) remembered that my whole point was: get news from more than just one source
Re: Cambridge Analytica
So let's say a neighborhood has a place where the community all posts info about themselves, for whatever reason. The door is not locked, and I get into it. If I go to that community center and gather that info, and go around door-to-door trying to sell a broom or cleaning products to all the homes with ladies, am I breaking the law? What If I wanted to sell toys to all the houses with children? Would it only be illegal if I want to distribute political literature to homes with adult voting age males with brown hair?
edit: or bad toupees or combovers...
Why would it matter if I was a Russian, or a white boy from Kalamazoo? Political speech is either allowed or it's not. I don't see how you can split hairs over who is allowed, or what speech is allowed by content?
edit: or bad toupees or combovers...
Why would it matter if I was a Russian, or a white boy from Kalamazoo? Political speech is either allowed or it's not. I don't see how you can split hairs over who is allowed, or what speech is allowed by content?
resigned by AI ChatGPT
Re: Cambridge Analytica
bw123, if you disagree with the law suit thingymagicks currently being filed/launched against CA and FB, in both the UK and USA afaik, and for several breaches of current law, i suggest you take it up with the powers that be to protest against these laws, and for CA's and FB's innocence.
- Fernando Negro
- Posts: 124
- Joined: 2013-11-24 01:29
- Location: Portugal
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: Cambridge Analytica
You bet it is...debiman wrote: this is only one of many icebergs of which we only see the tip.
(Concerning only two of the bigger icebergs,)
1) Facebook is a CIA front company (https://web.archive.org/web/20120524105 ... a-y-darpa/) and even has Nazis behind it (http://www.rtve.es/alacarta/audios/radi ... ok/885357/). Its officials admittedly want to end Privacy on the Internet (https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/com ... -anonymity). And, if you all want to know what these officials think of the people using it, you need to go no further than reading what Mr Zuckerberg once said: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14 ... rust_dumb/
2) Google is another CIA/NSA front company (https://www.prisonplanet.com/group-call ... d-nsa.html + https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence ... 36451a959e). (Who doesn't use Gmail, Android smartphones...)
(And, concerning the whole sea that we're navigating in,)
3) The Internet, itself, was a creation of the US government. And, the ultimate purpose of this invention is to spy on everybody (https://www.c-span.org/video/?440695-1/ ... nce-valley). Having for that same purpose been previously built an electronic Big Brother, that pays attention to (and records) everything that happens on this network (https://trisquel.info/en/forum/big-brot ... d-software + https://twitter.com/BlackFerdyPT/status ... 4950077440).
(Also, concerning the computers that most people, in developed countries, nowadays use,)
4) Almost every computer being sold, for years now, comes with a backdoor inside of it, from where it can be surveilled/controlled, in a way undetectable by the operating system being used (https://libreboot.org/faq.html#intel).
(So, the only real way to have Privacy, nowadays, is to *not* use computers connected to the Internet...)
Last edited by Fernando Negro on 2018-04-06 19:24, edited 1 time in total.
I just *love* the stability, much more bug-free nature, and modular installation options of Debian. Apart from the unfortunate adoption of "systemd" (viewtopic.php?f=20&t=129881&start=165#p671030) this distribution is *great*.
- Fernando Negro
- Posts: 124
- Joined: 2013-11-24 01:29
- Location: Portugal
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: Cambridge Analytica
In other words,
If you want to be safe and really have Privacy, stay "ashore".
Even if you use strong encryption in your communications, the US government has ways of decrypting it (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZQXxUmROIU#t=1h8m25s). And, the technology that the US government has - and that, for the reason of wanting to be in advantage, doesn't share - is usually about 2 decades more advanced than what normal people use.
The Internet is a great tool do disseminate information, and to communicate with other people with whom we would not have the opportunity to otherwise. But, to use it for anything beyond that, is usually counterproductive - and we should only use e-mail, Skype and such to communicate if we really have to.
From what I know, the main purpose of this type of general surveillance (not just Facebook, but reading everyone's e-mails etc) is not even to spy on individual people. But, to collect (generic) data in order to make studies on the general population (know how people think, react etc) in order to develop better ways of controlling the latter.
And, all the immensely naive people who continue thinking that governments and big corporations are trustworthy entities, are falling into the establishment's own trap - by giving it even more means to better enslave them.
MI6 agent Eric Blair wrote in a famous book that the future would be one were the establishment would be aware of everything that people did, even inside their own houses, by using cameras and microphones for it.
Well, look at the type of computers that people nowadays have...
"In three consecutive transparencies, the authors of the presentation draw a comparison with '1984,' George Orwell's classic novel about a surveillance state, revealing the agency's current view of smartphones and their users. 'Who knew in 1984 that this would be Big Brother...' the authors ask, in reference to a photo of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs. And commenting on photos of enthusiastic Apple customers and iPhone users, the NSA writes: '...and the zombies would be paying customers?'"
--- http://www.spiegel.de/international/wor ... 21161.html
If you want to be safe and really have Privacy, stay "ashore".
Even if you use strong encryption in your communications, the US government has ways of decrypting it (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZQXxUmROIU#t=1h8m25s). And, the technology that the US government has - and that, for the reason of wanting to be in advantage, doesn't share - is usually about 2 decades more advanced than what normal people use.
The Internet is a great tool do disseminate information, and to communicate with other people with whom we would not have the opportunity to otherwise. But, to use it for anything beyond that, is usually counterproductive - and we should only use e-mail, Skype and such to communicate if we really have to.
From what I know, the main purpose of this type of general surveillance (not just Facebook, but reading everyone's e-mails etc) is not even to spy on individual people. But, to collect (generic) data in order to make studies on the general population (know how people think, react etc) in order to develop better ways of controlling the latter.
And, all the immensely naive people who continue thinking that governments and big corporations are trustworthy entities, are falling into the establishment's own trap - by giving it even more means to better enslave them.
MI6 agent Eric Blair wrote in a famous book that the future would be one were the establishment would be aware of everything that people did, even inside their own houses, by using cameras and microphones for it.
Well, look at the type of computers that people nowadays have...
"In three consecutive transparencies, the authors of the presentation draw a comparison with '1984,' George Orwell's classic novel about a surveillance state, revealing the agency's current view of smartphones and their users. 'Who knew in 1984 that this would be Big Brother...' the authors ask, in reference to a photo of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs. And commenting on photos of enthusiastic Apple customers and iPhone users, the NSA writes: '...and the zombies would be paying customers?'"
--- http://www.spiegel.de/international/wor ... 21161.html
Last edited by Fernando Negro on 2018-04-07 09:20, edited 1 time in total.
I just *love* the stability, much more bug-free nature, and modular installation options of Debian. Apart from the unfortunate adoption of "systemd" (viewtopic.php?f=20&t=129881&start=165#p671030) this distribution is *great*.
- Fernando Negro
- Posts: 124
- Joined: 2013-11-24 01:29
- Location: Portugal
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: Cambridge Analytica
Another iceberg,
This one with a most interesting shape - https://micahflee.com/2013/01/why-im-le ... ment-39171 - and that has, in the meantime, grown bigger: https://fossbytes.com/ubuntu-data-collection/
This one with a most interesting shape - https://micahflee.com/2013/01/why-im-le ... ment-39171 - and that has, in the meantime, grown bigger: https://fossbytes.com/ubuntu-data-collection/
I just *love* the stability, much more bug-free nature, and modular installation options of Debian. Apart from the unfortunate adoption of "systemd" (viewtopic.php?f=20&t=129881&start=165#p671030) this distribution is *great*.
Re: Cambridge Analytica
the pressure on facebook is still on.
They are being investigated in UK and USA afaik.
Germany will likely follow soon, government officials have pressing questions to ask of facebook officials.
Zuckerberg himself admitted that the numbers of affected users are much higher than 50 million - 87 million is his new estimate, which means it is likely still higher.
They are being investigated in UK and USA afaik.
Germany will likely follow soon, government officials have pressing questions to ask of facebook officials.
Zuckerberg himself admitted that the numbers of affected users are much higher than 50 million - 87 million is his new estimate, which means it is likely still higher.
Re: Cambridge Analytica
Some people around here need better tinfoil hats. There is no conspiracy, with the possible exception of an internal FB coverup when the problems started surfacing a few years ago. The FB scandal is simply the result of (then) nitwit college kids not thinking things all the way through because they were too busy banking boatloads of money.
Nobody would ever ask questions If everyone possessed encyclopedic knowledge of the man pages.
Re: Cambridge Analytica
From what I have read, everyone seems mad about the info being shared, but not about the advertising that was purchased and targeted at the users involved? I mean, if a company has info on a person, so what? It's what they do with it that matters, and targeting ads at people based on demographics is big money I hear...acewiza wrote:Some people around here need better tinfoil hats. There is no conspiracy, with the possible exception of an internal FB coverup when the problems started surfacing a few years ago. The FB scandal is simply the result of (then) nitwit college kids not thinking things all the way through because they were too busy banking boatloads of money.
I still don't see what law was broken, or how governments run by big money is going to fix anything. They can investigate all year long, but what solution is there?
resigned by AI ChatGPT