Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Musing about Debian alternatives

Off-Topic discussions about science, technology, and non Debian specific topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
golinux
Posts: 1579
Joined: 2010-12-09 00:56
Location: not a 'buntard!
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#21 Post by golinux »

Bulkley wrote:
stevepusser wrote:I wonder if the Bunsen Labs script to convert a Debian installation to it would work on MX. . . .
Devuan had a similar script. Maybe it still does.
There are migration instructions for jessie to jessie and stretch to ASCII here

I'm also going to post the list of automatically banned packages with hard systemd dependencies which cannot be installed on Devuan and packages requiring libsystemd0 which for the moment is "harmless" but at some point, who knows . . .

https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/bannedpackages.txt
https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/libsystemd.txt

You will notice the increase in number of pkgs tied to systemd from jessie to beowulf. The noose is tightening.
May the FORK be with you!

xepan
Posts: 89
Joined: 2018-11-28 06:38

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#22 Post by xepan »

CwF wrote:... But I typically try not to assume old ways are best,
...
I did say I skipped whatever prior goodnees existed, so I'm ignorant.
...
Neither in the past nor in in the presence there is/was only a single alternative.
(Gentoo usually uses openrc, Slackware's init is called rc, i think, Void uses runit, Dragora uses perpd, tiny core linux uses busybox, i think, the BSD operating systems also use neither sysv nor systemd, perhaps rc too).

One simple example of the difference, of someone who isn't biased against systemd, au contraire: http://mywiki.wooledge.org/SystemdNoClear
Not necessary an "issue", but for sure a difference, as in: a completely different mindset. It thinks it knows better what the user wants than the user.
I for one am not that much in the technical details, but debian/kFreeBSD and debian/Hurd sure are an "issue" (for me, for some), that is: systemd as the default debian init system probably will be the end of those subprojects of debian.
In this short time I have seen the notion of corporatism increase and a bias towards handhelds
Looks like it to me too, though i started to see it a bit earlier (the focus on handhelds).

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#23 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

golinux wrote:
Bulkley wrote:There may be a problem with the systemd-shim requirement. Isn't it deprecated in Buster?
Yes. I'm pretty sure it's unmaintained and going away.
Didn't you tell us that Devuan & Debian were working together to maintain sysvinit and the shim?
deadbang

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#24 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

stevepusser wrote:I wonder if the Bunsen Labs script to convert a Debian installation to it would work on MX.
That depends on how MX handle the configuration files in $HOME, the BL install script copies stuff over from /usr/share/bunsenlabs/skel to configure the desktop, which is quite unusual.
deadbang

User avatar
llivv
Posts: 5340
Joined: 2007-02-14 18:10
Location: cold storage

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#25 Post by llivv »

Thanks for the links golinux

Sid can run sysv with only libsystemd0 for a little more than a year now
Buster can now run sysv with only libsystemd0

although customizing the config, even on a minimal system using Debian defaults, is dangerous, as I'm finding out with the level of automation now present. One also needs a steady eye to avold systemd creep.

I was able to get sysv stretch running yesterday with only libsystemd0 libpam-systemd systemd needed to start X
It does take a bit of juggling with package installation order to lower the package count as with any minimal system installation.
In memory of Ian Ashley Murdock (1973 - 2015) founder of the Debian project.

User avatar
golinux
Posts: 1579
Joined: 2010-12-09 00:56
Location: not a 'buntard!
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#26 Post by golinux »

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
golinux wrote:
Bulkley wrote:There may be a problem with the systemd-shim requirement. Isn't it deprecated in Buster?
Yes. I'm pretty sure it's unmaintained and going away.
Didn't you tell us that Devuan & Debian were working together to maintain sysvinit and the shim?
They were working on an elongind solution etc. but that list was so prolific I didn't have time to keep current. The weeks that I did follow it, I never heard mention of a systemd-shim. And I just searched the titles of all those hundreds and hundreds of posts and still no shim. There was mention of hurd though.
May the FORK be with you!

xepan
Posts: 89
Joined: 2018-11-28 06:38

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#27 Post by xepan »

llivv wrote: One also needs a steady eye to avold systemd creep.
Yup.
I for one am done with that. To me the init system isn't a subject interesting enough to always keep up to date, fiddle, repair, workaround.
So i switched the distro, and i might well switch to any of the BSD's, if i need to.

User avatar
golinux
Posts: 1579
Joined: 2010-12-09 00:56
Location: not a 'buntard!
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#28 Post by golinux »

xepan wrote:To me the init system isn't a subject interesting enough to always keep up to date, fiddle, repair, workaround.
If systemd were only init, there wouldn't be a problem. But systemd isn't just an init system. It has wormed it's way into every corner of userspace locking things into a systemd OS that limits user freedom.
May the FORK be with you!

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#29 Post by stevepusser »

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
stevepusser wrote:I wonder if the Bunsen Labs script to convert a Debian installation to it would work on MX.
That depends on how MX handle the configuration files in $HOME, the BL install script copies stuff over from /usr/share/bunsenlabs/skel to configure the desktop, which is quite unusual.
Buckley said they didn't want the MX xfce desktop, they wanted openbox, so I though that the BL version on top of the MX base might work.

Jesse Smith over at Distrowatch also said that he's working on updating sysvinit.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
golinux
Posts: 1579
Joined: 2010-12-09 00:56
Location: not a 'buntard!
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Musing about Debian alternatives

#30 Post by golinux »

stevepusser wrote:Jesse Smith over at Distrowatch also said that he's working on updating sysvinit.
Yes, he is maintaining sysvinit upstream and active on the collaborative list. Unfortunately, there is still a fair amount of politics there even though it is tucked away from the main Debian dev list(s) where the conflict made collaboration extremely difficult. I applaud those involved for trying and wish them every success.
May the FORK be with you!

Post Reply