Personally, I'm not surprised to learn this about Richard Stallman...
https://www.thedailybeast.com/famed-mit ... ly-willing
He supports the (pro-War) Democratic Party, and the (pro-poverty, pro-population reduction and control, and pro-ecological lies) Green Party. So, he cannot truly be an "ethical" person.
He created the FSF while working at the private, elitist MIT. A well-known institution of the US establishment, which receives money from DARPA, and which develops Artificial Intelligence - that well-informed persons know it's mainly going to be used on surveillance projects.
Also, people who are politically well-informed know there is a clear agenda, from the part of the Western establishment, to sexualize children:
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archiv ... ic-schools +
https://www.infowars.com/salon-pushes-p ... thy-again/
Taking all this into account, and also noticing how the biggest user of Free Software is the (private) establishment itself, in the form of the exact companies that are known to be surveilling everyone (Facebook, Google, Amazon)... Everything fits, or adds up.
This being said,
And, although I really don't like what I've learned about the creator of this Free Software movement...
Creations are one thing, and their creators another.
Am I going to go back to (the still horrible, after all this years) Microsoft Windows because of this? Or, does all of this invalidate the superior performance and all the other great qualities of Free Software, in itself?
Like,
Will I stop using helicopters and jet aircraft, because they were Nazi inventions? Or, will I refuse to ride on Mercedes-Benz or Volkswagen cars, because of their Nazi ties?