Memory use disparity between two identical SD cards

I'm using Debian 10.70.
I have two 128GB SDXC cards.
I formatted both with GParted, to the default full size, as Ext2.
For card 1, GParted reported the first sector at 2048, the last sector at 243597311 and the total sectors as 243595264
For card 2, GParted reported the first sector at 2048 the last sector at 243630079 and the total sectors as 243628032
a difference in size of exactly 32768 bytes or 32KiB.
df reports the usable partition space available for card 2 as 4096 of 4KiB blocks larger than for card 1.
Then I used rsync to copy the same 50GiB of data to both of them: 347389 files & 16378 folders.
However:-
Dolphin reports that the memory used is 53,983,883,989 bytes for card 1 and 53,983,834,837 bytes for card 2; a difference of 49152 bytes or 48KiB.
Not much but I had expected that the memory used would be exactly the same for both cards.
I checked that the memory use attributed to the files was the same for both cards;
and so presumably the extra memory use arrises from differing ammounts used for the directory data;
but why is there a difference when the data copied to both cards is the same?
I have two 128GB SDXC cards.
I formatted both with GParted, to the default full size, as Ext2.
For card 1, GParted reported the first sector at 2048, the last sector at 243597311 and the total sectors as 243595264
For card 2, GParted reported the first sector at 2048 the last sector at 243630079 and the total sectors as 243628032
a difference in size of exactly 32768 bytes or 32KiB.
df reports the usable partition space available for card 2 as 4096 of 4KiB blocks larger than for card 1.
Then I used rsync to copy the same 50GiB of data to both of them: 347389 files & 16378 folders.
However:-
Dolphin reports that the memory used is 53,983,883,989 bytes for card 1 and 53,983,834,837 bytes for card 2; a difference of 49152 bytes or 48KiB.
Not much but I had expected that the memory used would be exactly the same for both cards.
I checked that the memory use attributed to the files was the same for both cards;
and so presumably the extra memory use arrises from differing ammounts used for the directory data;
but why is there a difference when the data copied to both cards is the same?