Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Off-Topic discussions about science, technology, and non Debian specific topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
Nili
Posts: 441
Joined: 2014-04-30 14:04
Location: $HOME/♫♪
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1546 Post by Nili »

openSUSE Tumbleweed KDE/Wayland

♫♪ Elisa playing...
Damascus Cocktail ♪ Black Reverie ♪ Dye the sky.

User avatar
Nili
Posts: 441
Joined: 2014-04-30 14:04
Location: $HOME/♫♪
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1547 Post by Nili »

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:^ 35MiB used at a full graphical desktop, how impressive is that? #nonemoreminimal
If it's x64 arch, I have to say that is the most minimalistic i 've seen or you've achieved.
I went up to 70MB for x64, but didn't play longer to strip.

About x86, well... i have seen more surprises :)

Congratulations for your tweaks/scrots, I saw without commenting mostly.
openSUSE Tumbleweed KDE/Wayland

♫♪ Elisa playing...
Damascus Cocktail ♪ Black Reverie ♪ Dye the sky.

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1548 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

Nili wrote:If it's x64 arch
Yes it is :)

The musl libc base gives Alpine an advantage over most other GNU/Linux distributions: Devuan manages ~55MiB (under OpenRC) and Debian buster's systemd init pushes that up by another 10MiB or so.

Both are better than Arch though, that takes up 70MiB just at a console screen :o
deadbang

User avatar
Nili
Posts: 441
Joined: 2014-04-30 14:04
Location: $HOME/♫♪
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1549 Post by Nili »

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:Yes it is :)

The musl libc base gives Alpine an advantage over most other GNU/Linux distributions: Devuan manages ~55MiB (under OpenRC) and Debian buster's systemd init pushes that up by another 10MiB or so.

Both are better than Arch though, that takes up 70MiB just at a console screen :o
Interesting! I followed your impressions regarding Alpine, musl, ksh/fish. I really find em fascinate :)
They're on my to do list, once i have a time to check them.
openSUSE Tumbleweed KDE/Wayland

♫♪ Elisa playing...
Damascus Cocktail ♪ Black Reverie ♪ Dye the sky.

User avatar
None1975
df -h | participant
df -h | participant
Posts: 1387
Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1550 Post by None1975 »

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:^ 35MiB used at a full graphical desktop, how impressive is that? #nonemoreminimal
It is very impressive. I never reached such results ...Keep a good computing!
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github

ruffwoof
Posts: 298
Joined: 2016-08-20 21:00

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1551 Post by ruffwoof »

On my local tmux, the Prefix key is set to backtick (press it twice to display a backtick). F11 for new window, F12 for next window. Which blends well with mc that uses F1 to F10. And doesn't conflict with a remote tmux that uses the default ctrl-b prefix

Image

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1552 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

Image

Packaging for Alpine Linux is so much simpler than Debian, although they did steal the method from Arch's PKGBUILDs. But then Arch stole theirs from Gentoo's ebuilds so I suppose that's OK.
deadbang


User avatar
None1975
df -h | participant
df -h | participant
Posts: 1387
Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1554 Post by None1975 »

Nice and minimal desktop, archimboldo!
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github

archimboldo
Posts: 12
Joined: 2017-10-06 16:45

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1555 Post by archimboldo »

None1975 wrote:Nice and minimal desktop, archimboldo!
Thank you. :)

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1556 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

Image
deadbang

ruffwoof
Posts: 298
Joined: 2016-08-20 21:00

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1557 Post by ruffwoof »

FatDog 8.0 final.

Image

Top bar is the main desktop's. I run a local tmux with its window list also at the top and non default keys ... so when I ssh into another box and run tmux on that the two don't conflict.

Bottom bar is my second secure (container) bar (Xephyr/unshare/chroot/capsh isolation from the main desktop).

Buried under those 14 windows is the desktop, but that's just any old image/picture that looks nice.

User avatar
GarryRicketson
Posts: 5644
Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
Location: Durango, Mexico

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1558 Post by GarryRicketson »

This was mostly a experiment , to see if I could change the Xterm icon size, and yes I could,..Using FVWM on OpenBsd it was fairly simple:
Image
The above was when I doubled the size.
Below, doubled it again:
Image
==== edited ====
Guess I should have mentioned, the File manager is "Thunar"
Last edited by GarryRicketson on 2019-05-02 18:21, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1559 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

@Garry, what file manager is that?

Image

^ Path tracing in OpenBSD: https://github.com/fogleman/pt
deadbang

User avatar
GarryRicketson
Posts: 5644
Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
Location: Durango, Mexico

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1560 Post by GarryRicketson »

@Garry, what file manager is that?
Thunar

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1561 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

9front:

Image
deadbang

User avatar
None1975
df -h | participant
df -h | participant
Posts: 1387
Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1562 Post by None1975 »

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:9front:
Nice and old school font!
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1563 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

^ Yeah, 9front rocks :)

Debian buster running under vmm(4):

Image

The RC1 installer worked fine, which is nice.
deadbang

User avatar
GarryRicketson
Posts: 5644
Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
Location: Durango, Mexico

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1564 Post by GarryRicketson »

Image

User avatar
oswaldkelso
df -h | grep > 20TiB
df -h | grep > 20TiB
Posts: 1485
Joined: 2005-07-26 23:20
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 54 times

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

#1565 Post by oswaldkelso »

Dragora3 alpha i386

Only for the adventureus atm with lots of bass application still to built yet, not even a dedicated installer.

The packagemanager qi is neat. named after the chinese https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi . I still call it "chee". :-)
The recipes fetch sources and build packages and allows multple versions of the same package with out interferance. In therory you can build Dragora packages and run them on other dristros without screwing with the default distro. like snaps or flatpak packages but with the benefit of always being able to look at and modifying the source as you do it. Don't try this at home unless you know what you're doing and have read and understood the manual http://www.dragora.org/manual/en/html_n ... ement.html

Dragora 3 has the init scheme divided into 2 parts to make it more reliable.
1 Process number 1 (sysvinit) is limited to manage the stages for boot and shutting down the system, but nothing more.
2 Supervisor service (Perp) The control of services is done using Perp only.

This way if the service supervisor dies the system should still run.

No X

Private + Shared = RAM used Program

44.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 44.5 KiB perpboot
64.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 64.5 KiB socklog
72.0 KiB + 1.5 KiB = 73.5 KiB crond
92.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 92.5 KiB perpd
124.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 124.5 KiB init
92.0 KiB + 54.5 KiB = 146.5 KiB dpid
120.0 KiB + 48.5 KiB = 168.5 KiB file.dpi
196.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 196.5 KiB acpid
76.0 KiB + 137.0 KiB = 213.0 KiB agetty (2)
184.0 KiB + 49.5 KiB = 233.5 KiB tinylog (9)
296.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 296.5 KiB rc.main
392.0 KiB + 184.5 KiB = 576.5 KiB dbus-daemon
544.0 KiB + 48.5 KiB = 592.5 KiB dhcpcd
532.0 KiB + 889.0 KiB = 1.4 MiB bash (2)
1.6 MiB + 184.5 KiB = 1.8 MiB wpa_supplicant
1.7 MiB + 666.0 KiB = 2.4 MiB udevd (2)
---------------------------------
8.3 MiB
=================================

DWM

Private + Shared = RAM used Program

44.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 44.5 KiB perpboot
64.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 64.5 KiB socklog
72.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 72.5 KiB crond
92.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 92.5 KiB perpd
124.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 124.5 KiB init
92.0 KiB + 36.5 KiB = 128.5 KiB dpid
96.0 KiB + 44.5 KiB = 140.5 KiB file.dpi
68.0 KiB + 114.5 KiB = 182.5 KiB rc.main
72.0 KiB + 114.5 KiB = 186.5 KiB startx
76.0 KiB + 111.0 KiB = 187.0 KiB agetty (2)
196.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 196.5 KiB acpid
184.0 KiB + 49.5 KiB = 233.5 KiB tinylog (9)
160.0 KiB + 225.5 KiB = 385.5 KiB xinit
272.0 KiB + 215.5 KiB = 487.5 KiB dbus-daemon
416.0 KiB + 98.5 KiB = 514.5 KiB dhcpcd
732.0 KiB + 913.5 KiB = 1.6 MiB bash (3)
1.6 MiB + 170.5 KiB = 1.7 MiB wpa_supplicant
1.5 MiB + 712.0 KiB = 2.2 MiB udevd (2)
2.3 MiB + 856.5 KiB = 3.2 MiB dwm
2.9 MiB + 828.5 KiB = 3.7 MiB st
7.7 MiB + 490.5 KiB = 8.2 MiB Xorg
---------------------------------
23.6 MiB
=================================

Private + Shared = RAM used Program

44.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 44.5 KiB perpboot
64.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 64.5 KiB socklog
72.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 72.5 KiB crond
92.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 92.5 KiB perpd
92.0 KiB + 27.5 KiB = 119.5 KiB dpid
124.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 124.5 KiB init
120.0 KiB + 25.5 KiB = 145.5 KiB file.dpi
76.0 KiB + 96.0 KiB = 172.0 KiB agetty (2)
68.0 KiB + 114.5 KiB = 182.5 KiB rc.main
68.0 KiB + 114.5 KiB = 182.5 KiB startx
196.0 KiB + 0.5 KiB = 196.5 KiB acpid
184.0 KiB + 49.5 KiB = 233.5 KiB tinylog (9)
108.0 KiB + 151.5 KiB = 259.5 KiB xinit
152.0 KiB + 179.5 KiB = 331.5 KiB fittstool
272.0 KiB + 185.5 KiB = 457.5 KiB dbus-daemon
420.0 KiB + 88.5 KiB = 508.5 KiB dhcpcd
432.0 KiB + 982.5 KiB = 1.4 MiB icewm-session
728.0 KiB + 925.5 KiB = 1.6 MiB bash (3)
1.6 MiB + 162.5 KiB = 1.7 MiB wpa_supplicant
792.0 KiB + 1.0 MiB = 1.8 MiB icewmtray
1.5 MiB + 656.0 KiB = 2.2 MiB udevd (2)
1.8 MiB + 1.2 MiB = 3.0 MiB icewmbg
2.6 MiB + 468.5 KiB = 3.1 MiB xterm
4.1 MiB + 1.3 MiB = 5.4 MiB icewm
7.9 MiB + 429.5 KiB = 8.3 MiB Xorg
---------------------------------
31.5 MiB
=================================

Anyway the desktop stuff

running icewm 1.4.2

terrible gif screenshot as I didn't compile in png support with shutterbug https://b2aeaa58a57a200320db-8b65b95250 ... source.gif
Free Software Matters
Ash init durbatulûk, ash init gimbatul,
Ash init thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
My oldest used PC: 1999 imac 333Mhz 256MB PPC abandoned by Debian

Post Reply