Page 58 of 88

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-09-03 12:23
by Head_on_a_Stick
Arch [testing]:

Image

I changed the GNOME top panel font with this snippet in ~/.themes/CustomFontTheme/gnome-shell/gnome-shell.css:

Code: Select all

stage {
font-family: "Cantarell", "Sans";
}
That then allows the universal "Sans" alias to be set (for all applications) via ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf (see /etc/fonts/fonts.conf for examples using the correct syntax) :)

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-09-05 20:19
by Head_on_a_Stick
Alpine Linux running dwm, st. tmux, fortune(1), neofetch and some commands for the busybox-based OpenRC init system:

Image

Still no wallpaper :D

EDIT: just noticed from the scrot that my firewall wasn't up, oh dear.

It is now though:

Code: Select all

empty@alpine:~ $ rc-service nftables status
 * status: started
empty@alpine:~ $

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-09-06 00:16
by HuangLao
SalixOS/Slackware with Xfce, wallpaper compliments of Xubuntu..... :lol:
Image

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-09-10 21:33
by Head_on_a_Stick
Image

Same operating system, different hardware. And a wallpaper.

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-09-18 10:59
by oswaldkelso
Dragora 2.2

Thought I'd better get some practice in ready for the up and coming all new and shinny Dragora 3 (D3) alpha. http://dragora.org/repo.fsl/timeline
Yes, even us freetards know how to have fun. This was a joke that turned into a theme.

Image

larger
http://picpaste.com/2017-09-17-Dragora- ... k5GT1W.png

The Dragora-stallman openbox theme is here.
https://www.box-look.org/p/1191774/

Wallpaper is available under CC-BY-SA but really was a quick hack and needs a remake.

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-09-19 20:19
by Head_on_a_Stick
^ Nice! :D
oswaldkelso wrote:Wallpaper is available under CC-BY-SA
I do hope that's not under v2.0 or v2.5... :mrgreen:

I've installed Alpine Linux on my hard drive now, I love it to bits:

Image

(That's the spacefm file manager and two rxvt-unicode client windows running neofetch and vim open at an APKBUILD for 9base)

systemd is now in a minority when it comes to init systems in our house :|

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-09-21 20:10
by ruffwoof
Pretty much the same as my Debian Jessie ... which looks like

Image

Similar for my FreeBSD and XenialPup64 multi-boots.

All use xorg, jwm, pcmanfm base (with pcmanfm --desktop providing desktop icon support).

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-08 12:08
by Head_on_a_Stick
Image

Development version of BunsenLabs Helium booting with OpenRC and the new openrc-init binary, no sysvinit or systemd required :D

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-09 19:13
by Nili
Image
Wallpaper: A port part in TOKYO

DEVUAN
Launcher tint2 Icons: Lances Two
WM: herbstluftwm / tint2 / conky

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-10 05:40
by Head_on_a_Stick
Image

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-14 13:50
by Head_on_a_Stick
Alpine Linux (edge branch) running dwm & slstatus with an rxvt-unicode client window:

Image

Lean.

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-14 16:25
by VentGrey
Alpine Linux (edge branch) running dwm & slstatus with an rxvt-unicode client window:
+10 lynx, I love your wm configs :mrgreen:

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-15 07:42
by Head_on_a_Stick
^ Thanks!

I've added some links for the configs, in case anybody is interested but note that my dwm fork doesn't do xinerama.

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-20 20:38
by ruffwoof
With the recent release of OpenBSD 6.2 I gave it another try. Last time I tried OpenBSD it wasn't much of a success as it didn't work well with nvidia (windows were laggy to drag around), so this time I used the onboard Radeon ATI and its working really well.

(clickable thumbnail)
Image

I opted to use 3 gkrellm's, each set to a relatively small height and positioned them side by side in the top left (disk, cpu, net). I matched the jwm tray height to the same along with matching the colours (my preference is a jwm and pcmanfm --desktop base system). I've set the clock (top left) so that left click acts as show/hide desktop toggle and right mouse click activates MENU. I also added in a borderless/titleless terminal window sized to 60x7 characters that opens below those gkrellm's and that displays/runs htop ... which adds visibility of my CPU's 4 cores (along with some other data/stats). So collectively the desktop is quite animated/active.

Some programs added to the tray i.e. right click of osmo or libre quicklauncher presents dropdown menu for notes/calendar/events and office type choices, other tray buttons directly start programs (firefox, terminal ...etc.). Some icons also put on the desktop for drag/drop operations (e.g. drag a file manager .jpg file to desktop mtpaint program icon opens up mtpaint with that .jpg file ready to be edited).

The basic OpenBSD install was a breeze as was adding packages (pkg_add instead of apt-get). Much nicer than FreeBSD IMO as it more or less all comes pre-configured. Apparently syspatch updates the core system, pkg_add -u updates programs and both worked smoothly (similar to apt-get update, apt-get upgrade). Adding softdep,noatime to each rw ffs filesystem helped improve overall operational speed (switches from being very secure synchronous disk IO to async/buffering ... with considerable speed improvement but foregoes some security/stability (not really a issue for a desktop system, more of a concern for heavily loaded large servers)).

Liking it a lot. Especially having the gkrellm's flashing away as part of the taskbar (still visible when programs are maximised).

Negatives : 6 monthly releases, each release supported for a year, means having to reinstall (upgrade) relatively frequently (6 monthly/1 year), at least if you want to be kept security patched (compared to sticking perhaps for 4 years with a Debian release). Repositories are much more limited ... however personally sufficient to cater for my needs. A lot less usage (at least from a desktop perspective), so google searches tend to result in far fewer associated results than Debian/Linux in general.

I like it a lot, enough to be a keeper, now have it set as my default boot and will stick with that at least for a while (maybe even longer term). I've removed my nvidia card (after the dry summer months I like to dust out the inside of the PC) and it runs really quiet now and when idle CPU usage drops and stays at 0% (runs a lot cooler also).

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-20 21:52
by Head_on_a_Stick
ruffwoof wrote:Apparently syspatch updates the core system, pkg_add -u updates programs
Not quite — OpenBSD only supplies third-party binaries for -release (and -current) whereas syspatch(8) upgrades your base system to -stable so then you have to compile your own updated packages from the ports tree.

I would recommend -current for desktop use as it makes maintenance considerably simpler: just boot from /bsd.rd to update to the latest snapshot and use `pkg_add -u` to get the binary updates for third-party packages.

https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-20 22:52
by ruffwoof
Thanks Head_on_a_stick

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-20 23:25
by RU55EL
My "little" computer after upgrade from Rasbian 8 to Raspbian9.1 and the 8 GB SD card with a 8 GB USB drive replaced with a 32 GB SD card:

Image

Now seeding Debian 9.2.1 (was seeding 9.2.0)

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-10-21 07:41
by ruffwoof
Nice RU55EL

Similar to my recent Debian Stretch 'upgrade' (reinstalled using netinst to upgrade from Jessie) - but I'm not using tmux.

Image

That's a LXDE DE install, with 3 gkrellm's (top left) sized to fit in with the reduced width panel so that 'animated' system activity is still visible when a program is full screen (panel still visible). Menu has been mapped to the clock (left click clock shows the menu), and two undecorated xterms, one to show a htop summary, the other running mc. Mouse over set to sloppy focus (whatever is under the mouse is brought into focus, so quicker/easier to type a command into mc's command line) and the 2 xterms are set to below (so act somewhat like being the wallpaper). xterm's Ctrl left-mouse brings up its menu so for instance the small htop can be maximised to being full screen.

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-11-01 13:33
by GarryRicketson
Recently upgraded OpenBsd to 6.2
Image

Two of the many advantages to OpenBsd that I like is the simple easy
upgrade process and the syspatch feature, that helps keep security patches up-to-date.
The "pkg_add" also is nice, and makes installing packages very simple,straight forward.

Re: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?

Posted: 2017-11-01 23:33
by ruffwoof
GarryRicketson wrote:Recently upgraded OpenBsd to 6.2
Image

Two of the many advantages to OpenBsd that I like is the simple easy
upgrade process and the syspatch feature, that helps keep security patches up-to-date.
The "pkg_add" also is nice, and makes installing packages very simple,straight forward.
Once I dropped nvidia to use the onboard radeon I liked OpenBSD quite a lot. One issue however I had was with installation to a partition. All too easy to have it install to the full disk and lose everything else (I multi-boot) as it does major changes without warning. I gave up with trying to install it to a partition as its disk partition program was too difficult for me in the end (far from intuitive/easy).

Nicer that freebsd IMO if you're more inclined to pre-built packages as pretty much installs configured whereas with freebsd you have to read a lot to figure out the configurations.

Another downside for me was the frequency and potential intensity of upgrades. With Debian its much easier to just stick with older program versions for longer but have security issues patched. OpenBSD is more prone to updates breaking things such as different configuration files being used in later versions of programs such that after a upgrade some things might not work as before and involve further investigation/effort (not so good if primarily you just want a working 'office/end user' type system).