Debian User Forums

Richard wrote:...from the twilight zone...

Your image sizing is from the Twilight Zone. Did you upload a thumbnail?

Yes, just forgot to change the size to Large.
It is done now, and changed.
Actually, not. The image is too small and doesn't scale. I'll a find better/another image.

The fish are from the last iso, SOS-2dev1, of the now defunct SalineOS,
to be based on Wheezy, with some backports and utilities.
The original SalineOS-1.0 was based on Squeeze. Solid with backports.

High Sierra 10.13.4

Took a lot of effort but now it works just like on Mac

pawRoot wrote:High Sierra 10.13.4

12 Gigabytes of RAM and still uses swap. Very strange.

None1975 wrote:

pawRoot wrote:High Sierra 10.13.4

12 Gigabytes of RAM and still uses swap. Very strange.

No idea about it, but everything works perfect.

pawRoot wrote:High Sierra 10.13.4

Took a lot of effort but now it works just like on Mac

https://i.imgur.com/Vl11HPzl.jpg

is this actually MAC OS, not Linux?
seeing the processes and paths, it all looks very unfamiliar (and seems to take LOADS of resources).

debiman wrote:

pawRoot wrote:High Sierra 10.13.4

Took a lot of effort but now it works just like on Mac

https://i.imgur.com/Vl11HPzl.jpg

is this actually MAC OS, not Linux?
seeing the processes and paths, it all looks very unfamiliar (and seems to take LOADS of resources).

Yes it is, and when it comes to resources i would say it's similiar to Gnome 3, at least RAM wise.

pawRoot wrote:Yes it is, and when it comes to resources i would say it's similiar to Gnome 3, at least RAM wise.

:confused:

so what is the point of this statement:

pawRoot wrote:High Sierra 10.13.4

Took a lot of effort but now it works just like on Mac

you managed to make a mac work just like a mac, and it took a lot of effort???

maybe there's some subtle differences between mac and mac, which i do not understand, being a lowly linux luddite...

^ I installed it on PC... not Mac

pawRoot wrote:^ I installed it on PC... not Mac

Sorry, dude. It is looks nice, tut who is it so hard?

None1975 wrote:

pawRoot wrote:^ I installed it on PC... not Mac

Sorry, dude. It is looks nice, tut who is it so hard?

Because installation process is different for every machine, takes alot of research to know how to make config files for your machine etc.

And my lost post wasn't to you but debiman

Back on topic: What does your non-Debian desktop look like?
OpenBsd , with a couple of QEMU guests running,

bg-tile posted by QDesjardin @ r/unixporn

Nili wrote:

bg-tile posted by QDesjardin @ r/unixporn

It is Openbox?

None1975 wrote:It is Openbox?

Yes, it's Openbox with Nightmare theme, slightly colors modified somewhere.