ArconsII wrote:I was told Arch Linux is better than Debian and I should switch to it. What are the major differences? Is there any reason to do so?
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
make
su -c 'make install'
AnimeHendrix wrote:Q: How do you know someone is using Arch Linux?
A: They'll tell you.
AnimeHendrix wrote:
Then everything started breaking around me. It was at this time I realized I didn't want a complete rolling release distribution. In fact, I don't think anyone does. You want the userland applications to be updated. Things like Firefox, Libreoffice, and the like. But the kernel? glibc? These should be stable. That combined with the INCREDIBLE security risk that is the AUR and the lack of GPG signing and general polish left me longing for stable + backports.
ArconsII wrote:What are the major differences?
ArconsII wrote:Is there any reason to do so?
servingwater wrote:As much as I like the concept of rolling release that is a very good point.
However I can't speak for Arch but can't you just blacklist vital parts like these?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest