Just to confirm, this is, in fact, the #4 hit for me when I click on the link in the second post [since Google displays result order differently per user] - even higher. The OP did say the following:dasein wrote: "That" = the #5 hit at Google using the exact search that I pointed you to two days ago, but you were too farqing lazy even to click.
That's weird, because if he got the same list of answers previously, he already would have come across that link, but yet, it was untried by him. He says he only tried the first link in the results generated. Everything points to insufficient research.Believe or not, but I did search google (did not take me hours) and got the same list of answers you were so kind to post
Let's face it, this thread has turned into a bit of a strudel but it does exhibit an important lesson about the importance of thorough user research. Objectively, dasein's original reply was critical but also helpful [if heeded] because the link the OP needed was indeed part of that he posted [which he said he already tried, and if he had clicked it, it would have appeared a second time for him]. As a result, the thread became unnecessarily circular.
Still, I'm glad the OP got his problem sorted.
EDIT: I didn't realise that all dasein did was Google the exact topic title. None of this needed to happen.