Debian User Forums

by **TristanDee** » 2009-12-09 09:03

Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts.

Code: Select all: oracle:/home/rubel# aptitude safe-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libsdl1.2debian-alsa: Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio but 1.2.13-5 is to be installed. epiphany-browser: Conflicts: epiphany-gecko but 2.26.3-2 is installed and it is kept back. libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio: Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-alsa but 1.2.13-5 is installed. epiphany-gecko: Depends: epiphany-browser-data (< 2.27) but 2.29.3-1 is to be installed.

I'm not sure what to do--uninstall Epiphany? Please advise.

My sources.list:

Code: Select all: ###### Debian Main Repos deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free ###### Debian Update Repos deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free

by **Tixy** » 2009-12-09 09:54

I'm personally leaving Epiphany un-upgraded until their are no conflicts. Which should be when the 'gnome' meta-package gets upgraded to 2.28 after the last bits of 2.28 are migrated to Testing.

by **TristanDee** » 2009-12-09 13:46

Tixy wrote:I'm personally leaving Epiphany un-upgraded until their are no conflicts. Which should be when the 'gnome' meta-package gets upgraded to 2.28 after the last bits of 2.28 are migrated to Testing.

So, how to upgrade the whole system excluding one particular application since safe-upgrade does not do that? Will

Code: Select all: aptitude hold epiphany

do the trick? But safe-upgrade is supposed to always use the safe-resolver algorithm, according to aptitude manual.

Also there are conflicts between libsdl1.2debian-alsa and libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio.

Squeeze was installed from a weekly-build.

by **bugsbunny** » 2009-12-09 16:18

Show the rest of what aptitude is proposing to do (it's recommended solution). (In other words show the ENTIRE output). Also run it with the -D option. You can run the following as a normal user (nothing will actually get upgraded no matter what you answer):

Code: Select all: aptitude -sD safe-upgrade

by **Tixy** » 2009-12-09 18:11

TristanDee wrote:So, how to upgrade the whole system excluding one particular application since safe-upgrade does not do that?

I use Synaptics and manually select upgradable packages each day. I'm not familiar with aptitude or apt-get.

by **TristanDee** » 2009-12-09 18:53

bugsbunny wrote:Show the rest of what aptitude is proposing to do (it's recommended solution). (In other words show the ENTIRE output). Also run it with the -D option. You can run the following as a normal user (nothing will actually get upgraded no matter what you answer):
Code: Select all
aptitude -sD safe-upgrade

Hello bugsbunny, that WAS the entire output. Still here is what I got after running -sD safe-upgrade

Code: Select all: rubel@oracle:~$ aptitude -sD safe-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libsdl1.2debian-alsa: Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio but 1.2.13-5 is to be installed. epiphany-browser: Conflicts: epiphany-gecko but 2.26.3-2 is installed and it is kept back. libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio: Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-alsa but 1.2.13-5 is installed. epiphany-gecko: Depends: epiphany-browser-data (< 2.27) but 2.29.3-1 is to be installed.

by **bugsbunny** » 2009-12-09 20:48

That is NOT the entire output. If it was the last part would be aptitude asking if you want to continue and ending with a ?

by **bluesdog** » 2009-12-09 21:16

Use apt-cache show <packagename> and apt-cache depends <packagename> to see what packages you need, which ones are conflicting, & etc..

For example:

Code: Select all: $ apt-cache show epiphany-gecko Package: epiphany-gecko Priority: optional Section: gnome Installed-Size: 52 Maintainer: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> Architecture: all Source: epiphany-browser Version: 2.29.3-1 Depends: epiphany-browser (>= 2.28.0) Filename: pool/main/e/epiphany-browser/epiphany-gecko_2.29.3-1_all.deb Size: 21682 MD5sum: 518c6c38f317d156d866170e7c19580a SHA1: 22dfe953ea1eb04502d3bb7cb132264c24f4fa64 SHA256: 4891ee7225c96c2ce82ebb6c41c6e6bf011ddc3b9a94272973cc152284e450a0 Description: Dummy, transitional package This package has been made obsolete by epiphany-browser 2.28.0, and is safe to remove. Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/projects/epiphany/ Tag: implemented-in::c, interface::web, interface::x11, role::program, suite::gnome, uitoolkit::gtk, use::browsing, web::browser, works-with-format::html, x11::application Package: epiphany-gecko Priority: optional Section: gnome Installed-Size: 28 Maintainer: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> Architecture: all Source: epiphany-browser Version: 2.29.1-2 Depends: epiphany-browser (>= 2.28.0) Filename: pool/main/e/epiphany-browser/epiphany-gecko_2.29.1-2_all.deb Size: 22086 MD5sum: bdcce2471dc049e6d412aacfd1fbaf45 SHA1: 10e936cf36a4baca06951f139bd8bff30f1119c9 SHA256: 2217df96479c07204d8715626fb0c1f5592d522f4ea2ba26edc31cec0a50fe87 Description: Dummy, transitional package This package has been made obsolete by epiphany-browser 2.28.0, and is safe to remove. Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/projects/epiphany/ Tag: implemented-in::c, interface::web, interface::x11, role::program, suite::gnome, uitoolkit::gtk, use::browsing, web::browser, works-with-format::html, x11::application

and

Code: Select all: $ apt-cache depends libsdl1.2debian-alsa libsdl1.2debian-alsa Depends: libasound2 Depends: libc6 Depends: libdirectfb-1.2-0 Depends: libsvga1 Conflicts: <libsdl1.2> Conflicts: <libsdl1.2-all> libsdl1.2debian-all Conflicts: <libsdl1.2-arts> libsdl1.2debian-arts Conflicts: <libsdl1.2-esd> libsdl1.2debian-esd Conflicts: <libsdl1.2-nas> libsdl1.2debian-nas Conflicts: <libsdl1.2-oss> libsdl1.2debian-oss Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-all Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-arts Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-esd Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-nas Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-oss Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio Replaces: <libsdl1.2> Replaces: <libsdl1.2-all> libsdl1.2debian-all Replaces: <libsdl1.2-arts> libsdl1.2debian-arts Replaces: <libsdl1.2-esd> libsdl1.2debian-esd Replaces: <libsdl1.2-nas> libsdl1.2debian-nas Replaces: <libsdl1.2-oss> libsdl1.2debian-oss Replaces: libsdl1.2debian-all Replaces: libsdl1.2debian-arts Replaces: libsdl1.2debian-esd Replaces: libsdl1.2debian-nas Replaces: libsdl1.2debian-oss Replaces: libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio

You may then decide to remove certain packages, thus allowing installation of others.

by **TristanDee** » 2009-12-10 03:55

bugsbunny wrote:That is NOT the entire output. If it was the last part would be aptitude asking if you want to continue and ending with a ?

I know what aptitude asks during the upgrade process and I was expecting it. But all it did was going back to my prompt just after mentioning the conflicts. I didn't paste up to the prompt line, and here it is:

Code: Select all: oracle:/home/rubel# aptitude safe-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... Resolving dependencies... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libsdl1.2debian-alsa: Conflicts: libsdl1.2-esd which is a virtual package. Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-esd but 1.2.13-5 is to be installed. libsdl1.2debian-esd: Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-alsa but 1.2.13-5 is installed. oracle:/home/rubel#

BTW, Epiphany conflict got resolved automatically after I installed flashplugin-nonfree, sun-java6-jre. I don't know which one resolved the problem.

by **bluesdog** » 2009-12-11 01:02

Of course you are updating local apt cache first with

Code: Select all: aptitude update

To check your sources list, please post output of

Code: Select all: cat /etc/apt/sources.list

and to see if anything is being held back:

Code: Select all: aptitude search ~ahold

and to do a sanity check on dpkg

Code: Select all: dpkg -C

and to see specific information on the packages which seem in conflict

Code: Select all: apt-cache policy libsdl1.2esd

Code: Select all: apt-cache policy libsdl1.2debian-esd

and

Code: Select all: apt-cache policy libsdl1.2debian-alsa

by **jheaton5** » 2009-12-11 01:33

I had the same dependency issues. I apparently updated after the break in squeeze. Today I did

Code: Select all: # aptitude --full-resolver full-upgrade

@ 100 files were removed @100 new files were added and @100 files upgraded. The system is now restored to where it should be.

by **bluesdog** » 2009-12-11 02:17

jheaton5, that's good and useful information.

I've been running Sid/Experimental, and doing full-upgrades so long I'd forgotten about the resolver switch for aptitude

:wink:

safe-upgrade is for wimps! :wink:

by **TristanDee** » 2009-12-11 11:45

@ bluesdog and jheaton5: I've been currently away from my home PC. I'll definitely try your suggestions, especially that of jheaton5 since you say you had similar dependency conflict situation, when I get back home tonight. Meantime, thanks for all your cooperation.

I'll get back to you guys with updates.

Debian User Forums

Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Re: Aptitude detects some dependency conflicts

Who is online