I noticed that after resuming from a 'pm-hibernate' the mount count for the fs does not icrease,
so my question is: is it safe to hibernate instead of shutting down?
I'm just concerned about fsck.
Thanks for your reply.
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Hibernation and mount count
Hibernation and mount count
Hi guys,
I noticed that after resuming from a 'pm-hibernate' the mount count for the fs does not icrease,
so my question is: is it safe to hibernate instead of shutting down?
I'm just concerned about fsck.
Thanks for your reply.
I noticed that after resuming from a 'pm-hibernate' the mount count for the fs does not icrease,
so my question is: is it safe to hibernate instead of shutting down?
I'm just concerned about fsck.
Thanks for your reply.
-
utrrrongeeb
- Posts: 254
- Joined: 2006-05-14 09:48
- Location: Eastern Canada
Re: Hibernation and mount count
Assuming the hibernating procedure is reliable and functioning properly, it's safe.
It's a good idea to reboot every few days or so, and that will just delay the fsck.
It's probably possible to increase the fsck-rate, but I don't know at the moment how to do that....
It's a good idea to reboot every few days or so, and that will just delay the fsck.
It's probably possible to increase the fsck-rate, but I don't know at the moment how to do that....
utrrrongeeb formerly lecaro
Art #429775 on 'Etch' 4.0r0
Art #429775 on 'Etch' 4.0r0