Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

[SOLVED] New motherboard graphics test

Need help with peripherals or devices?
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
ticojohn
Posts: 1284
Joined: 2009-08-29 18:10
Location: Costa Rica
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 44 times

[SOLVED] New motherboard graphics test

#1 Post by ticojohn »

I just installed a new motherboard ( Gigabyte GA-H81M-H ) with an Intel i5 4460 processor. I ran glxgears to test the graphics display rate and go the following result.

Code: Select all

john@JohnBoy:~$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh.  The frame rate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
377 frames in 5.0 seconds = 75.387 FPS
Not surprising as my monitor refresh rate is 75 Hz.

I then ran the test with vblank_mode = 0, as suggested on a blog I read, and got the following result.

Code: Select all

john@JohnBoy:~$ vblank_mode=0 glxgears
ATTENTION: default value of option vblank_mode overridden by environment.
ATTENTION: default value of option vblank_mode overridden by environment.
39607 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7921.256 FPS
40283 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8056.519 FPS
Now, I'm pretty darned sure that my on board graphics and my LCD monitor are not capable of that high of a frame rate. So what does that number (~ 8000 FPS) really represent?
Last edited by ticojohn on 2017-03-29 13:59, edited 1 time in total.
I am not irrational, I'm just quantum probabilistic.

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: New motherboard graphics test

#2 Post by stevepusser »

Why not that high a rate? That's a very simple animation, and doesn't depend on what your monitor can do.

Try enlarging the window to see if the rate drops, too.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
ticojohn
Posts: 1284
Joined: 2009-08-29 18:10
Location: Costa Rica
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: New motherboard graphics test

#3 Post by ticojohn »

stevepusser wrote:Why not that high a rate? That's a very simple animation, and doesn't depend on what your monitor can do.

Try enlarging the window to see if the rate drops, too.
Okay. I guess I am just too hung up on old school teaching. Yes indeed, when I expand the glxgears window the frame rate drops considerably. Near full screen size and I get about 1400 FPS. Still seems really high. Guess what I really don't understand is the apparent de-coupling from the vertical blanking and still getting the signal "framed". That's not how I learned about all that some 50 years ago. Guess I should just be happy that my on board graphics seems to perform well.

And by the way, I think you were the one that told me there shouldn't be issues with Jessie on the Haswell processor. You were correct sir. The only issue I had was when I booted Stretch amd64 (just to try it out), from an old hard drive. There was an issue with the Realtek internet chip set. Installed the Realtek firmware and everything is cool. As long as i686 is available I probably won't bother to upgrade my Jessie i686 installation to amd64. It does everything I want it to do.

Thanks Steve
I am not irrational, I'm just quantum probabilistic.

User avatar
ticojohn
Posts: 1284
Joined: 2009-08-29 18:10
Location: Costa Rica
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: New motherboard graphics test

#4 Post by ticojohn »

Okay. Did some book learnin ! LOL. Now I get it. The GPU is capable of pushing out a whole bunch more frames than that defined by the sync rate. Doesn't mean however that they are actually being displayed. Read this article which pretty much cleared it up for me.

http://www.avadirect.com/blog/frame-rat ... resh-rate/

Thanks again Steve
I am not irrational, I'm just quantum probabilistic.

Bulkley
Posts: 6386
Joined: 2006-02-11 18:35
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: New motherboard graphics test

#5 Post by Bulkley »

Glxgears is still around? It was always fun to play with but pretty much useless. Glxgears is not a Benchmark For troubleshooting purposes use glxinfo.

Post Reply