Of course not, but if that's their own purpose here you can safely block them (add them to "foe" list) Besides, bitching about Ubuntu and stupidity go hand in hand, you won't miss much if you block them. I blocked 4-5 people, you still see that they post but you won't see what they post unless you click to expand their post, at the beginning I was still expanding their posts curious to find what I was missing, I found out that each of their posts was idiotic, that pretty much confirmed my initial decision to block them.Soul Singin' wrote:Thanks for the tip. I'll look into it.AdrianTM wrote:I see stupidity... nothing really to censor... and I've already blocked one of the posters anyway, I do my own censorship, I don't fell like I should censor the forum for other people, I suggest you do the same, ban the idiots and you'll see their posts only if somebody is kind to quote them. I tell you, this saves you a lot of time and nerves.
Can I ban angry Ubuntu exiles before they land here?
.
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
Ubuntu hate is a mental derangement.
- Soul Singin'
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: 2008-12-21 07:02
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
Cool.AdrianTM wrote:Of course not, but if that's their own purpose here you can safely block them (add them to "foe" list) Besides, bitching about Ubuntu and stupidity go hand in hand, you won't miss much if you block them. I blocked 4-5 people, you still see that they post but you won't see what they post unless you click to expand their post, at the beginning I was still expanding their posts curious to find what I was missing, I found out that each of their posts was idiotic, that pretty much confirmed my initial decision to block them.Soul Singin' wrote:Can I ban angry Ubuntu exiles before they land here?
Hmmm ... Who should be the first person on my "foes" list? ... Oh yeah! shadowking !!!
.
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
I believe this thread constitutes whining about Ubuntu, and what is more it brings out superubuntuman to defend his beloved so it's spam as well. Can someone please move this thread to the resolution center?
Infractions, warnings and jailing all round
Infractions, warnings and jailing all round
Wisdom from my inbox: "do not mock at your pottenocy"
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
I've actually had him banned for a while, but I did learn something useful from his trolling, for example my Windows machine that I use once a month or even less got the filehippo treatment (he recommended it) and it's much easier to keep up with the upgrades, so even a troll is sometimes useful.Soul Singin' wrote:Hmmm ... Who should be the first person on my "foes" list? ... Oh yeah! shadowking !!!
.
Ubuntu hate is a mental derangement.
Re: mischief
And maybe for good reasons. Why on earth should ubuntuforums.com have a poll about whether or not discussions concerning ubuntu should be allowed on forums.debian.net?Soul Singin' wrote:Closed in under an hour.MALsPa wrote:Soul Singin' wrote:I just posted this poll and my original post over at Ubuntu Forums.
Let's see how long it lasts.
If the thread doesn't get closed, it'll be fun to see what replies get posted!
.
- Soul Singin'
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: 2008-12-21 07:02
Re: mischief
That was the point !mojoman wrote:And maybe for good reasons. Why on earth should ubuntuforums.com have a poll about whether or not discussions concerning ubuntu should be allowed on forums.debian.net?
- Why on earth should Debian Forums have discussions about Ubuntu Forums ???
- Why do Ubuntu exiles bring their grievances with Ubuntu Forums over here ???
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
So your new ubuntu thread is ok but others should be disallowed? Hmmm....are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the comm....err...an admin at ubuntuforums?
Wisdom from my inbox: "do not mock at your pottenocy"
Re: mischief
I'd rather see that we didn't but not to the extent that I'd want to see it forbidden.Soul Singin' wrote:
- Why on earth should Debian Forums have discussions about Ubuntu Forums ???
It's a common behavior of people who have applied for, and been granted, asylum.Soul Singin' wrote:[/list] .
- Why do Ubuntu exiles bring their grievances with Ubuntu Forums over here ???
Seriously though, I do find it a bit bothersome. I mean, if one have a problem with ubuntuforums.com, don't hang out there. I find it irritatingly conformist and intolerant and to boot it also have a huge amount of people who are utterly clueless. Nothing wrong with being clueless, I've been it myself when I started out but the amount of posts and threads that I would characterize as useless is immense. So, I don't hang out there. It's really that simple. But both you and Nadir sure have a point when you say that these threads draw a lot of attention. They go on for pages and and get a high number of views. I know I can contribute to this sometimes, even though I don't particularly like it. Maybe we need to be a little more egocentric here.
Oh, if only some of my arcane technical problems received the same attention...
- Soul Singin'
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: 2008-12-21 07:02
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
Of course the thread at Ubuntu Forums was out of place !!!julian67 wrote:So your new ubuntu thread is ok but others should be disallowed? Hmmm....are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the comm....err...an admin at ubuntuforums?
That's the point !!!
Why is it OK to discuss Ubuntu Forums here at Debian Forums, but it's not OK to discuss Debian Forums at Ubuntu Forums ???
.
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
I also agree there is too much Ubuntu whining and banning on this forum, but I don't think that those who have lately switched from Ubuntu to Debian have the most disparaging remarks (I say this in my defense too)...
Since censorship and open-source don't cope well together, there should be other ways to avoid Ubuntu discussions... like for example create a whole new forum called forums.ubuntu-haters.com or something. All these discussions wouldn't need to be off-topic over there
Since censorship and open-source don't cope well together, there should be other ways to avoid Ubuntu discussions... like for example create a whole new forum called forums.ubuntu-haters.com or something. All these discussions wouldn't need to be off-topic over there
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
It's OK here because this isn't Stepford and we can talk about pretty much anything vaguely related to computing. It's not OK there because....because...who cares anyway?Soul Singin' wrote: Why is it OK to discuss Ubuntu Forums here at Debian Forums, but it's not OK to discuss Debian Forums at Ubuntu Forums ???
Wisdom from my inbox: "do not mock at your pottenocy"
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
There is a lot of banning on this forum? Really?korami wrote:I also agree there is too much Ubuntu whining and banning on this forum [...]
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
Well, maybe if the poll in ubuntuforums.com had been "Should discussing Debian on ubuntuforums.com be banned?" it wouldn't have been locked (then again it may well have been...) but to ask "Should discussing Ubuntu on debian.forums.net be banned?" on ubuntuforums is just ... outlandish.julian67 wrote:It's OK here because this isn't Stepford and we can talk about pretty much anything vaguely related to computing. It's not OK there because....because...who cares anyway?Soul Singin' wrote: Why is it OK to discuss Ubuntu Forums here at Debian Forums, but it's not OK to discuss Debian Forums at Ubuntu Forums ???
Ok, maybe being outlandish isn't a good reason to lock thread, Sossego's threads aren't locked after all. But still, locking that thread is not by far the worst I've seen when it comes to locking threads (here or there).
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
Appologies, I meant bashing.mojoman wrote:There is a lot of banning on this forum? Really?korami wrote:I also agree there is too much Ubuntu whining and banning on this forum [...]
- kc1di
- Posts: 282
- Joined: 2007-03-12 12:52
- Location: Somewhere In Maine
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
IMHO censorship is not the answer. I don't know why people want to debase Ubuntu other than they seem to be at the top in Distrowatch's list.
I've tried many distros over the years since 1992 and find good in most of them , even ubuntu has it's good side. so let's focus on what people are doing right instead of
what is always lacking , I know that's not human nature, but seriously every linux distro i've used in the past and present has it's good spots. some more than others. I think the fact that I always end up coming back to Debian speaks volumes about how well it's put together. and we should just concentrate on that. there is no need in tearing down ubuntu or any other distro. If some one complains about Ubuntu this or that simply try to point them to whats right with Debian. or Distro xx .
Censorship is not the answer. We can all learn a thing or two by hearing what others perceive is wrong with other distros and make up our minds what works best for each of us. those decrying Ubuntu today may be singing it's praises tomorrow and those who can't stand Debian today maybe won over tomorrow.
I've tried many distros over the years since 1992 and find good in most of them , even ubuntu has it's good side. so let's focus on what people are doing right instead of
what is always lacking , I know that's not human nature, but seriously every linux distro i've used in the past and present has it's good spots. some more than others. I think the fact that I always end up coming back to Debian speaks volumes about how well it's put together. and we should just concentrate on that. there is no need in tearing down ubuntu or any other distro. If some one complains about Ubuntu this or that simply try to point them to whats right with Debian. or Distro xx .
Censorship is not the answer. We can all learn a thing or two by hearing what others perceive is wrong with other distros and make up our minds what works best for each of us. those decrying Ubuntu today may be singing it's praises tomorrow and those who can't stand Debian today maybe won over tomorrow.
Dave
Morse Code -An Early digital mode !
Bookworm
John 3:16
Registered Linux User # 462608
Morse Code -An Early digital mode !
Bookworm
John 3:16
Registered Linux User # 462608
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
Should not be banned, but also it should not be the focus. Threads like this highlight it and make it seem to be an "issue", which it isn't. Just ignore those threads.
- Soul Singin'
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: 2008-12-21 07:02
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
Did you ignore this thread? Nope! You felt the need to read it and post a response. And you felt the need to respond to all three of our currently running Ubuntu Piñata Fests.cynwulf wrote:Should not be banned, but also it should not be the focus. Threads like this highlight it and make it seem to be an "issue", which it isn't. Just ignore those threads.
At the moment, one of those piñata fests has 55 posts, another has 45 posts and the third has 38 posts. By posting this message, I am bringing this Ubuntu-related thread up to 57 posts. A search for the term "ubuntu" yields 13,165 matches. That's almost 5 percent of the 278,226 posts on this board.
Obviously, we are not ignoring the Ubuntu Piñata Fests. Instead we have made Ubuntu a primary topic of conversation and ignored the technical support questions that this board is intended to address.
So I am now opposed to my own reasonable proposal (for a modest ban on Ubuntu whining) and I am switching my vote to "Yes. Debian only please."mojoman wrote:Oh, if only some of my arcane technical problems received the same attention...
I now support a complete ban on all discussion of Ubuntu and I politely request that the moderators of this forum immediately impose a lifetime ban on anyone who engages in an Ubuntu Piñata Fest.
.
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
And you felt the need to create this one which is growing and growing. Talk about adding fuel to the fire...Soul Singin' wrote: Did you ignore this thread? Nope! You felt the need to read it and post a response. And you felt the need to respond to all three of our currently running Ubuntu Piñata Fests.
And I want it to always be sunny on my birthday and I want ice cream every day and when I enter a room I'd like to hear a fanfare of trumpets instead of muted curses and farting noises.Soul Singin' wrote: I now support a complete ban on all discussion of Ubuntu and I politely request that the moderators of this forum immediately impose a lifetime ban on anyone who engages in an Ubuntu Piñata Fest.
But I do support your demand to have yourself banned, you seem to be obsessed with spamming this board with ubuntu hate. I asked AdrianTM and he said you have a mental derangement. I guess he felt strongly about it because he didn't speak but wrote it on the wall in his own blood while laughing and crying.
Wisdom from my inbox: "do not mock at your pottenocy"
- Soul Singin'
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: 2008-12-21 07:02
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
This thread is not an Ubuntu Piñata Fest. It's a Debian Forums Piñata Fest.julian67 wrote:But I do support your demand to have yourself banned, ...Soul Singin' wrote:I now support a complete ban on all discussion of Ubuntu and I politely request that the moderators of this forum immediately impose a lifetime ban on anyone who engages in an Ubuntu Piñata Fest.
.
Re: Should discussion of Ubuntu be censored?
I mostly have fun with Ubuntu threads that's why I post in them, why do you want to take away the fun from this forum?
People who use Debian and bitch about Ubuntu probably have low self esteem that they feel the need to bitch about Ubuntu to make their distro look good or to make themselves accepted on this forum.
I'm not of the opinion that Debian in order to look good needs to knock other distros down, there's no need, really. Debian shines by what it is and what it does not by how bad other distros are.
As for feeling part of a gang, I was never fan of that, some people need to "belong", that's probably again that low self-esteem, they feel that they will not be accepted on this forum if they don't do what's considered "cool" -- making fun of brown.
People who use Debian and bitch about Ubuntu probably have low self esteem that they feel the need to bitch about Ubuntu to make their distro look good or to make themselves accepted on this forum.
I'm not of the opinion that Debian in order to look good needs to knock other distros down, there's no need, really. Debian shines by what it is and what it does not by how bad other distros are.
As for feeling part of a gang, I was never fan of that, some people need to "belong", that's probably again that low self-esteem, they feel that they will not be accepted on this forum if they don't do what's considered "cool" -- making fun of brown.
Ubuntu hate is a mental derangement.