Code: Select all
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth1 inet dhcp
wireless-essid UC
iface eth0 inet dhcp
auto eth0
Ok, should I still do that considering I'm currently connected anyways? Currently resolv.conf looks like this:fsmithred wrote:
Edit resolv.conf so it says:
nameserver 8.8.8.8
Code: Select all
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search puc.cl
fsmithred wrote: Try these commands exactly (two by number, two by name, in case one is down when you try):You can use ctrl-c to stop it.Code: Select all
ping google.com ping yahoo.com ping 4.2.2.2 ping 8.8.8.8
Code: Select all
This is the ping for google:hernan@debian:~$ ping google.com
PING google.com (209.85.195.104) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from eze03s01-in-f104.1e100.net (209.85.195.104): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=23.4 ms
64 bytes from eze03s01-in-f104.1e100.net (209.85.195.104): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=23.5 ms
64 bytes from eze03s01-in-f104.1e100.net (209.85.195.104): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=23.7 ms
64 bytes from eze03s01-in-f104.1e100.net (209.85.195.104): icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=23.6 ms
64 bytes from eze03s01-in-f104.1e100.net (209.85.195.104): icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=23.5 ms
64 bytes from eze03s01-in-f104.1e100.net (209.85.195.104): icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=23.8 ms
64 bytes from eze03s01-in-f104.1e100.net (209.85.195.104): icmp_seq=7 ttl=54 time=24.1 ms
^C
--- google.com ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6517ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.426/23.687/24.110/0.282 ms
Code: Select all
hernan@debian:~$ ping 4.2.2.2
PING 4.2.2.2 (4.2.2.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=137 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=138 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=137 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=137 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=137 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=138 ms
^C
--- 4.2.2.2 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5022ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 137.934/137.988/138.027/0.304 ms
No, I've conected here for a long time. All you have to do is give you physical ip adress and then your computer is part of the network. I gave my adress when I had Vista and wifi has kept on working with Ubuntu and with Debian, so no special requirements are needed.fsmithred wrote:Since you're on someone else's network, you might ask the administrator if there are special settings you need to connect to the internet
Thanks for the tip. This is the output for lsmod:stevepusser wrote:Well, you said you built your own driver for the wireless...and I have seen the behavior you report when there are multiple drivers for the device fighting over the device. (such as an Win driver in ndiswrapper and the native kernel rtl8187 for my alfa external usb wifi adapter) One may "win" and be able to scan, but not connect. What exactly is your device? Some kind of Broadcom chipset? A sure sign of trouble is to run "lsmod" in the terminal and find both wl and b43 listed in the output.
Code: Select all
hernan@debian:~$ lsmod
Module Size Used by
i915 35072 1
drm 91488 2 i915
nfsd 248616 13
lockd 68944 1 nfsd
nfs_acl 7552 1 nfsd
auth_rpcgss 47520 1 nfsd
sunrpc 197992 11 nfsd,lockd,nfs_acl,auth_rpcgss
exportfs 8704 1 nfsd
ppdev 11656 0
parport_pc 31016 0
lp 14724 0
parport 41776 3 ppdev,parport_pc,lp
ipv6 288456 31
sbp2 25356 0
loop 19468 0
joydev 14848 0
snd_hda_intel 436696 4
snd_pcm_oss 41760 0
snd_mixer_oss 18816 1 snd_pcm_oss
snd_pcm 81800 3 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss
snd_seq_dummy 7428 0
snd_seq_oss 33152 0
snd_seq_midi 11072 0
snd_rawmidi 26784 1 snd_seq_midi
snd_seq_midi_event 11904 2 snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi
snd_seq 54304 6 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_seq_midi_event
snd_timer 25744 3 snd_pcm,snd_seq
snd_seq_device 11668 5 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq
uvcvideo 55688 0
ieee80211_crypt_tkip 13184 0
snd 63688 15 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_seq_oss,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device
compat_ioctl32 12416 1 uvcvideo
[b]wl 1965700 0 [/b]
soundcore 12064 1 snd
i2c_i801 13596 0
ieee80211_crypt 10244 2 ieee80211_crypt_tkip,wl
psmouse 42268 0
videodev 35840 2 uvcvideo,compat_ioctl32
i2c_core 27936 1 i2c_i801
serio_raw 9988 0
pcspkr 7040 0
v4l1_compat 17284 2 uvcvideo,videodev
snd_page_alloc 13072 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
video 24212 0
output 7808 1 video
intel_agp 31856 1
button 11680 0
battery 16904 0
ac 9352 0
wmi 11712 0
dcdbas 11952 0
evdev 14208 8
ext3 125072 1
jbd 51240 1 ext3
mbcache 12804 1 ext3
ide_cd_mod 36360 0
cdrom 37928 1 ide_cd_mod
ide_pci_generic 9220 0 [permanent]
sd_mod 29376 3
piix 12424 0 [permanent]
ide_core 128284 3 ide_cd_mod,ide_pci_generic,piix
ahci 33036 2
ata_generic 10116 0
libata 165600 2 ahci,ata_generic
scsi_mod 161016 3 sbp2,sd_mod,libata
dock 14112 1 libata
sdhci 19460 0
ohci1394 32692 0
mmc_core 52448 1 sdhci
ricoh_mmc 8448 0
[b]ieee1394 93944 2 sbp2,ohci1394[/b]
sky2 48132 0
ehci_hcd 36108 0
uhci_hcd 25760 0
thermal 22688 0
processor 42304 3 thermal
fan 9352 0
thermal_sys 17728 4 video,thermal,processor,fan
Finally, now that I have wired connection. Is there some NM equivalent (or maybe the backport version) that I should install? recommendations will be considered.
Thanks you all for your patience and support. I hope this will help others with similar issues in the future.