Think of the children!nadir wrote:The Stirner story is short: whenever people speak of community or higher goals: be warned.
That's the really scary one.
Think of the children!nadir wrote:The Stirner story is short: whenever people speak of community or higher goals: be warned.
I agree.Soul Singin' wrote:Why would you want to have 3 pages of posts debating a mod's decision?JohnDeere630 wrote:what other forum could you have 3 pages of posts debating a mod's decision?
.
- Lock this thread, pleeeeaase !!!
What you seem to have missed here is that the picture being referd to in the post you are quoting is that of sexual organs. The picture of the breast were in another thread that I removed later and were posted there in direct defiance of my restating the forum rules, thus trying to see just how far one could push the staff here before something was done about it.julian67 wrote:I appreciate that expressions of sexuality are not always appropriate but is that picture really so offensive? Is it even that sexual? I noticed in the "banning" thread stuff likeandPictures depicting sexual organsHere's the big news: breasts are not sexual organs! They are breasts! The sexual organs of the human female are a couple of feet south of the breasts.To be clear here, what I removed was an animated pic of human sexual organs. However, even if it had been of some other animal I likely would have removed that as well.
As far as I'm concerned ... A newcomer as thoughtful as you is welcome to express his opinion anytime.stoat wrote:I'm a new member here.
Hear, hear....+10stoat wrote:I'm a new member here. I thought maybe someone would be interested in the comments of a newcomer watching this incident. Maybe not though. No hard feelings. But to me, the worst thing about this incident is the precedent that it establishes. As long as this thread exists, you kinda have to accommodate people who get banned for violating your rules and then re-register to come back and complain about it for days. Rules and punishment not only need to be applied fairly, but also consistently. To me, re-registering and posting a single additional post (starting this thread) should have been justification for a permanent ban (by IP if possible). Otherwise, the inmates are running the asylum.
We were all outsiders at first..........thoughtful people are always welcome.stoat wrote:It's your forum, and I'm still sort of an outsider.
Like you say: you are new and you can not know.stoat : Rules and punishment not only need to be applied fairly, but also consistently. To me, re-registering and posting a single additional post (starting this thread) should have been justification for a permanent ban (by IP if possible)
Hi Julian, Thank you.julian67 wrote:AM it seems I got the wrong end of the stick, I'm sorry.
Classic. That post should be the last word in this thread. Don't forget to turn off the lights.eric1959 wrote:
..look Mom, my first post about making a deb package....
http://forums.debian.net/index.php does not contain any pornographic content
Ah, I see. I did misunderstand a bit. Sorry about that. As for him attacking "me" (as you say), I am part of the staff, then and now.nadir wrote:No, i didn't leave it out.
It is about a completely different subject
(that, at that time, one was adviced to create another account)
Reread my post and you will understand it.
He didn't attack the staff. He did attack you.