Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

LXDE, the worst DE

Here you can discuss every aspect of Debian. Note: not for support requests!
Message
Author
tuxracer
Posts: 434
Joined: 2008-02-11 00:34

LXDE, the worst DE

#1 Post by tuxracer »

I installed Debian w/ LXDE and Lubuntu on my Thinkpad T41 laptop a while ago. I have since decided that I despise LXDE. There is poor integration or availability of features. No convenient way to add to keyboard layout among many others, for e.g. Also, the neglect of all the flaws by the devs.

But, one of my biggest issues has been other minor but really annoying quirks. Such as the scrollbar in my browsers. I can barely see them and I did try to change my brightness settings but it didn't help. LXDE is the most overrated, useless DE to come out, definitely.

There is little change in the features and as XFCE, KDE and Gnome are constantly changing and evolving, LXDE stays static and at a most primitive state.

I would re-install a different DE but my laptop has other problems (hardware). I'll be considering it, though. I have since lost my Lubuntu install (for whatever reason, once it loads, it's just a blue screen with the logo). I don't get the fanfare that comes with LXDE. It's one thing to be a low resources DE (which can be had with XFCE, openbox, fluxbox, Enlightenment etc.) but another when it's completely useless and lacks features.

Hopefully, DEs like XFCE can become more efficent but not lose the useful features that it offers.

secipolla
Posts: 1127
Joined: 2010-06-21 14:20

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#2 Post by secipolla »

LXDE is very good. Try and customize an Openbox or Icewm environment, which are similarly light, to have the ease of use and features that come in LXDE.
It happens that its main component, PCManFM (actually pcmanfm + libfm), has a rather buggy released version but its development version is very good.

Before talking nonsense, reckon that you should use what fits you better. There isn't any lack of alternatives.

emariz
Posts: 2901
Joined: 2008-10-17 07:59

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#3 Post by emariz »

I dislike bananas, guavas and raw tomatoes.

User avatar
craigevil
Posts: 5391
Joined: 2006-09-17 03:17
Location: heaven
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#4 Post by craigevil »

LXDE is actually a pretty cool DE, granted it doesn't have all of the features of KDE or Gnome but it also doesn't have the bloat, and it runs well on a low end system with 256mb of ram.

Once again tuxracer is complaining about something simply because he can't get it to work. Bad enough he was running Lubuntu and not Debian, but he still feels like this is the place to come complain.
Raspberry PI 400 Distro: Raspberry Pi OS Base: Debian Sid Kernel: 5.15.69-v8+ aarch64 DE: MATE Ram 4GB
Debian - "If you can't apt install something, it isn't useful or doesn't exist"
My Giant Sources.list

User avatar
Anzhr
Posts: 276
Joined: 2008-06-06 00:41

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#5 Post by Anzhr »

emariz wrote:I dislike bananas, guavas and raw tomatoes.

:evil: Flame War!

%$%##$@%$#&$&$
Xfce, Wheezy

tuxracer
Posts: 434
Joined: 2008-02-11 00:34

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#6 Post by tuxracer »

No flame war from me. This is General Discussion. I think I posted under the appropriate section. Craig continues to make unfair accusations. It's user testimonial and experiences and that is mine. It's a fact that LXDE hasn't made any strides on the features that are lacking.

I don't see why there's enthusiasm for this DE. It's good for older computers but I thought XFCE was good for that? Not any more?

I posted I used the LXDE in Debian and Ubuntu (Lubuntu). So, it was used on a Debian install, too. I don't even care for Ubuntu much anymore. It is moving away from Debian to a greater extent as I understand it. That wasn't the point, though.

Anyway, if everyone who replied likes LXDE, that's fine. All about choice, right? I feel that LXDE is moving way too slow and there are better choices available.

I never said it wasn't working either. I said the setup and appearance is really poor. Scroll bars that are barely visible and keyboard layouts that must be set up MANUALLY still among other issues.

Anyway, have fun with the LXDE if it is your cup of tea. I think it's overrated.

Edit: I probably should have asked for assistance to see if I could do anything about the scroll bars (it's annoying, trying to find it all the time) but it would be a pain to re-install (not sure that would help). My laptop has issues with the optical drive so I would probably need a usb stick to install. Furthermore, it's just a pet peeve for me that no one has improved the keyboard layout utility (no GUI) and other things. I suppose one could install one from Gnome and add dependencies (one shouldn't need) but whatever.

Nevermind my posts on this topic then. Remove or ignore. I was ranting... good day.

anticapitalista
Posts: 428
Joined: 2007-12-14 23:16
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#7 Post by anticapitalista »

I agree with the op that lxde is overrated.

I hate lxde, and cannot see why anyone who wants a light environment would choose it over any wm such as fluxbox, icewm, openbox, wmii, dwm, awesome (a misnomer IMO) and ratpoison to name a few.

For those that want a DE, xfce base on Debian (and its derivatives) is a much better option. More features, better integration and just as light.

Having said all that, if lxde is your cup of tea, then use and enjoy it. I'm sure you will :)
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
mvdan
Posts: 237
Joined: 2010-12-17 17:52
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#8 Post by mvdan »

You should try Knoppix on a DVD. Its LXDE is absolutely wonderful. I am now enjoying Fluxbox, and it is pretty similar.
Unstable 'Sid' amd64 - Awesome WM - https://gitorious.org/~mvdan
Richard M. Stallman wrote:We can't take the future of freedom for granted. Don't take it for granted! If you want to keep your freedom, you must be prepared for it.

secipolla
Posts: 1127
Joined: 2010-06-21 14:20

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#9 Post by secipolla »

You aren't being reasonable, anti. Putting aside tastes.
1) Xfce isn't even close in terms of low resource usage as LXDE. This is a fact, I have both.
2) LXDE is as low resource as most of the standalone WMs. It has a very good panel and menu (let's not start talking about even getting a reasonable menu in any of those WM you cited).
3) It has proper start and logout scripts. This is something even long time users of standalone WMs keep hitting their head on the wall to have working properly.
The three points above make a light environment accesible to everyone. Not only for people who would take the pains or even be able to set up something themselves, so that's the main point of LXDE.
Besides that it's actually a small collection of light applications that can be used separately.
A nice task manager, a very good and very lightweight file manager (I know you have trouble with pcmanfm but I use the git version in Debian and, for instance, it automounts my thumbdrives and I don't need to dig some hack to make that work), a simple session manager, a light music player and a very good panel and menu system. Besides its libs that are lightweight alternatives for GNOME's.

User avatar
dmhdlr
Posts: 266
Joined: 2011-04-17 23:44
Location: Philadelphia

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#10 Post by dmhdlr »

What a thread title.

Perhaps XFCE > LXDE would have been more productive.

Anyway, MORE FLOSS is better than less FLOSS. Even the half-thought gesture counts!
[formerly known as Deckard]
"Emacs: making you posthuman since 1976"
Axiom #1: Emacs is a text interface prosthesis
Axiom #2: Org-mode gives you super cyborg organizational powers
cf. Why Emacs | Emacs-fu | EmacsWiki | Worg

gerry
Posts: 325
Joined: 2007-09-13 07:23
Location: England

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#11 Post by gerry »

I tried LXDE. My problem with it was that Debian does not manage to get my screen resolution right unaided. Usually you can depend on a gui in your desktop environment to do it- with LXDE this is true, except that you have to do it every time you boot.
Got rid of it, just use icewm now.
gerry
Age 80- and still learning!

Magnusmaster
Posts: 168
Joined: 2010-06-12 22:50

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#12 Post by Magnusmaster »

I didn't have problems with LXDE. It doesn't have much features, but it works wonders in an old computer.

anticapitalista
Posts: 428
Joined: 2007-12-14 23:16
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#13 Post by anticapitalista »

secipolla, maybe I was a bit harsh and too personal in my tastes.

Certainly, lxde is not the worst DE and for new users with old boxes, it is a good start as most of the basic stuff needed is there.

I can only compare lxde/xfce on Debian sid (via antiX) and lxde RAM usage was 62MB compared to xfce 78MB on a box with 3GB available. However, when tested in VirtualBox with RAM set to 256MB, the difference between lxde RAM usage and xfce was not so great, about 5MB difference.

The panel is obviously much better than the one in fluxbox, but icewm's panel can be easily configured to run quick start apps.
The logout stuff in lxde looks just like the one in xfce, it may even be the same, I don't know. But there is no login manager (at least not in Debian) so you have to use slim or gdm. Slim is nice and light, but gdm has more to offer if your RAM is up to it and you have multi-user, multi-language set up.

I don't really like the options lxde chooses for me as well even though they are light, functional and work well enough. I just prefer others. (The same applies to xfce). As you know secipolla, I prefer Rox to pcmanfm, as a filer and for setting the desktop.

I guess what I'm saying is that if I were to choose a desktop environment (I wouldn't as I prefer wm), I would choose xfce-basic install over lxde. You get more with an increased price in RAM use worth it IMO.
For a sort of lxde set up, I prefer a wm plus the added bits that don't exist the secipolla mentions, and the apps of my choice rather than lxde itself.

Anyhow, good luck to the lxde developers. They are certainly helping to make linux more user-friendly without excessive bloat.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

emariz
Posts: 2901
Joined: 2008-10-17 07:59

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#14 Post by emariz »

anticapitalista wrote:I can only compare lxde/xfce on Debian sid (via antiX) and lxde RAM usage was 62MB compared to xfce 78MB on a box with 3GB available.
On this laptop, Gnome uses 70 MB of RAM upon start. On the desktops at the office, it uses less than 55 MB of RAM. A comparison of average RAM usages might be more relevant than a comparison of RAM usages upon start. And even that might not lead to a useful (particular) conclusion, because the default applications from each desktop environment offer very different feature sets.
Last edited by emariz on 2011-04-29 05:19, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Joel
Posts: 215
Joined: 2007-11-16 14:29
Location: Tijuana, BC, México

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#15 Post by Joel »

That's what a love from Debian, you can make your own Desktop..

I have Fluxbox with lxmenu and both are good con-existing :)

Of course, if you have the time to learn and type more :)
* PC: Intel Core 2 DUO E6550 @ 2.33 GHz with 2 GB RAM: Archlinux-32b w/ xfce4.
* Laptop: Intel Core 2 DUO T6600 @ 2.20 GHz with 4 GB RAM: ArchLinux-64b w/ xfce4.

User avatar
woteb
Posts: 124
Joined: 2009-01-24 09:51
Location: Netherlands (Veluwe)

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#16 Post by woteb »

Right! That's Debian, you can use what you want and what you need. I use plain Openbox with Rox, Lxappearance, Lxpanel (on the top), Wbar (on the bottom) and Thunar. No need for LXDE, rock solid and extremely fast.
Laptops: HP 250 G6 i3 7th gen + Lenovo: Debian Testing XFCE
HP based chromebooks: Debian Testing and other variations
"The simple reality of the matter is that Debian is essentially the backbone of Linux - for all practical purposes."

Derduden
Posts: 1
Joined: 2011-06-02 21:34

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#17 Post by Derduden »

I just happened to stumple upon this discussion which lead me to create a profile and comment :)
Anyway I think LXDE is just fantastic!
I've got this laptop from HP with a 1.6 Ghz AMD Neo singlecore and needless to say this is no monster of cpu-cycles, but it's very light (the laptop)

1st I thought I'd be friends with Win7, but I realized it was too much for the poor thing!
Then I went straight to Gnome but it was even worse than Win7, I dunno why but the cpu-usage was so high by every task I had to do..
I tried out Unity, which turned out to be the worst performing desktop that I have ever encountered!!

Then I found LXDE, which just fitted me perfectly! The performance is great and I didn't need to do too many customizations. So I think I've found my perfect DE for almost any computer with lack of cpu-power. Last machine I set up with LXDE was a PIII Mobile 600 Mhz with 192 MB ram combined with Lubuntu 11.04 it was running just about okay and everything just worked! Ram usage with Chromium started was about 70 MB :-)

Anyway my 1.6 Ghz Neo combined with Kingston SSD 280 MB/s hits the DE from cold in less than 15 seconds so yeah I'm pleased with LXDE!

User avatar
Anzhr
Posts: 276
Joined: 2008-06-06 00:41

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#18 Post by Anzhr »

Excellent, Derduden.
Xfce, Wheezy

User avatar
birdywa
Posts: 120
Joined: 2007-12-08 22:15

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#19 Post by birdywa »

I like LXDE a lot, I just wish PCmanFM was a little more polished, i wish it came with better default fonts, and I wish you could remove all of the desktop icons. Other than those small gripes, I dont have much bad to say about this awesome DE. Its basically the only one that actually tries to conform to the UNIX philosophy. It would be cool if they made something akin to LXDE using a tiling WM.

User avatar
mvdan
Posts: 237
Joined: 2010-12-17 17:52
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: LXDE, the worst DE

#20 Post by mvdan »

birdywa wrote:I like LXDE a lot, I just wish PCmanFM was a little more polished, i wish it came with better default fonts, and I wish you could remove all of the desktop icons.
Have you tried XFE? After using Nautilus, Dolphin, Thunar, PCmanFM and MC, it's clearly the best. It can be 100% used without any need of the mouse, handles perfectly file formats and applications, and its configuration (both from plain text config file and preferences window) is very extensive. It is based on ROX, so no external dependencies whatsoever. Very fast and lightweight, as well.
Unstable 'Sid' amd64 - Awesome WM - https://gitorious.org/~mvdan
Richard M. Stallman wrote:We can't take the future of freedom for granted. Don't take it for granted! If you want to keep your freedom, you must be prepared for it.

Post Reply