I had to change themes in order to vote properly.saulgoode wrote:Were you able to resolve this, yet? It is concerning if you are unable to vote and if there is something that needs to be done by me to address this, please let me know.dilberts_left_nut wrote:Voting for 2 (doesn't want to work from my phone will try again later).
(edit: still won't work - "the submtted form is invalid" ... ? )
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init system
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
May the FORK be with you!
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: 2007-12-14 23:16
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
golinux wrote:I had to change themes in order to vote properly.saulgoode wrote:Were you able to resolve this, yet? It is concerning if you are unable to vote and if there is something that needs to be done by me to address this, please let me know.dilberts_left_nut wrote:Voting for 2 (doesn't want to work from my phone will try again later).
(edit: still won't work - "the submtted form is invalid" ... ? )
More RedHat shenanigans?
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
https://antixlinux.com
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
Last edited by fleabus on 2014-11-25 02:16, edited 1 time in total.
Lenovo Legion 5-15IMH05 32GB Ram, 2TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe SSD
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
Nah. This happened to me on Squeeze still on Iceweasel 10 something. Some of the forum templates are a little funky. Code probably not up to date with the latest phpBB or web standards . . .anticapitalista wrote:More RedHat shenanigans?golinux wrote:I had to change themes in order to vote properly.saulgoode wrote: Were you able to resolve this, yet? It is concerning if you are unable to vote and if there is something that needs to be done by me to address this, please let me know.
May the FORK be with you!
- dilberts_left_nut
- Administrator
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: 2009-10-05 07:54
- Location: enzed
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
Cheers golinux - changed theme to prosilver and vote went through.
(Was redsilver3).
(Was redsilver3).
AdrianTM wrote:There's no hacker in my grandma...
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
Yup. redsilver3 was the one that hung me up too.dilberts_left_nut wrote:Cheers golinux - changed theme to prosilver and vote went through.
(Was redsilver3).
May the FORK be with you!
-
- df -h | grep > 20TiB
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
- Location: /dev/chair
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 190 times
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
While I have no real objection to systemd _as an init system_, shoving so much not-realy-inits-job code into PID1 makes me profoundly uncomfortable.
Not being able to run a full DE without this way-more-than-just-init monstrosity in PID1 (or recompiling half the distro) makes me profoundly annoyed.
Slackware is where I began, if this carries on I may well return there. FreeBSD is also looking pretty tasty right now...
Have a wild guess which way I voted
Not being able to run a full DE without this way-more-than-just-init monstrosity in PID1 (or recompiling half the distro) makes me profoundly annoyed.
Slackware is where I began, if this carries on I may well return there. FreeBSD is also looking pretty tasty right now...
Have a wild guess which way I voted
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: 2007-12-14 23:16
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
But, was redsilver3 written by Poettering?golinux wrote: Yup. redsilver3 was the one that hung me up too.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
https://antixlinux.com
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
I made a mistake in my initial post of this thread in stating that the requisite discussion period for the General Resolution had not started. I took the "TBC" status for the discussion to mean that it was yet "to be confirmed" or somesuch, and that the page would be updated once the official discussion period commenced.
But recent postings on the debian-vote mailing list suggest that the discussion period either 1) is now completed or 2) has only a day or two remaining. In either case, it is recommended that those wishing to voice their opinions on the issue do so without delay.
I apologize for the misunderstanding.
But recent postings on the debian-vote mailing list suggest that the discussion period either 1) is now completed or 2) has only a day or two remaining. In either case, it is recommended that those wishing to voice their opinions on the issue do so without delay.
I apologize for the misunderstanding.
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -- Brian Kernighan
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -- Brian Kernighan
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
With only one day remaining in the voting period, fewer than 500 (of the 1000+ DDs) have bothered to vote?
https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initcoupling/
Is such a low participation percentage typical?
https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initcoupling/
Is such a low participation percentage typical?
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
The voting period extends until the end of Tuesday, November 18th (UTC). https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_003s2pido wrote:With only one day remaining in the voting period, ...
I was thinking it was progressing rather well, given there are still about five days left. It is, at a minimum, nice to see that the issue won't just be decided by a handful of advocates (regardless of their position).s2pido wrote:... fewer than 500 (of the 1000+ DDs) have bothered to vote?
https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initcoupling/
Is such a low participation percentage typical?
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -- Brian Kernighan
-
- Posts: 183
- Joined: 2014-10-27 21:28
Re: Discussion for General Resolution on Debian's init syste
You mean like in most other distributions, say Slackware, huh?saulgoode wrote:s2pido wrote:I was thinking it was progressing rather well, given there are still about five days left. It is, at a minimum, nice to see that the issue won't just be decided by a handful of advocates (regardless of their position).s2pido wrote:... fewer than 500 (of the 1000+ DDs) have bothered to vote?
https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initcoupling/
Is such a low participation percentage typical?
Kidding aside this sure is way better
(I like the joke, but it is really just that: a joke. Perhaps a stupid one).
Still convinced the very best is to vote with the feet to put some pressure on Debian, to show that *that* is not what one has in mind when thinking of Debian. That will make them think, and only that (replacing systemd with sysv and pinning *systemd* including the libs *and* installing popularity-contest is another option, less strong and way too much work, imho).
Give me convenience or give me death.