Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
1) IMHO a forum that gets maybe 10-20 posts on average per day, doesn't necessarily need 13 distinct subforums. Many posts are posted in to wrong subforums, and I'm pretty sure that if some one wants to read posts relating to installation, they will search "installation...and something" rather than click on "Installation subforum". I don't know if so many categories is really helping. For example, there is "General discussion" that is supposed to not have "support questions", and to also not be off-topic, so that you can talk about Debian in general but not just anything. Firstly, why? Furthermore, many posts in there are actually Offtopic or support questions...
Even better IMO would be to adapt Discourse and have few tags. But that is arguably a question of taste. For those of you that are not familiar with it, it is an alternative to phpBB where all the posts on the forum are displayed on the first page and posting is one button away always. example here : https://meta.discourse.org/
2) Because there are so many Kali/Raspbian/other "Debian-based" support questions, and there might be issues that people here can help with, would it maybe make sense to a have separate area for those people where it is explicitly said that you are not allowed to expect similar support as for Debian, but that if you are lucky and nice about it, maybe you can get some help here.
Even better IMO would be to adapt Discourse and have few tags. But that is arguably a question of taste. For those of you that are not familiar with it, it is an alternative to phpBB where all the posts on the forum are displayed on the first page and posting is one button away always. example here : https://meta.discourse.org/
2) Because there are so many Kali/Raspbian/other "Debian-based" support questions, and there might be issues that people here can help with, would it maybe make sense to a have separate area for those people where it is explicitly said that you are not allowed to expect similar support as for Debian, but that if you are lucky and nice about it, maybe you can get some help here.
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
There is no need of what you propose. Just click active topics and you will have the latest posts listed. Furthermore, every sub-forum has a link to the latest post in it.
As it is, the fora's organisation is logical. Please, do not change it. The low post rate does not justify changing anything. In the past, these fora were frequented far more than now: the decline was caused when knowledgeable ripe users felt their say was ignored and when the fora's signal to noise ratio started to deteriorate.
As it is, the fora's organisation is logical. Please, do not change it. The low post rate does not justify changing anything. In the past, these fora were frequented far more than now: the decline was caused when knowledgeable ripe users felt their say was ignored and when the fora's signal to noise ratio started to deteriorate.
Debian == { > 30, 000 packages }; Debian != systemd
The worst infection of all, is a false sense of security!
It is hard to get away from CLI tools.
The worst infection of all, is a false sense of security!
It is hard to get away from CLI tools.
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
Amen, and plus 100, the post is more of a attempt at promotingPost by edbarx » 2016-09-12 02:20
There is no need of what you propose.----snip, no need for a full quote---
"discourse", then a "logical" idea,
There is another thread, as well where "pylkko ' jumped in,
trying to promote this "Discourse". At least this time the OP started a separate topic,
I didn't respond, because I didn't want to derail a topic I started,..
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php? ... 91#p621912
In a way, it is "convenient", that this was started though, I spent to much time
writing a reply, but saved it as a "draft", as I said, I decided not to post because
I did not want to derail the topic I started, but this thread would be more appropriate.
To start with,
This forum is a lot more then just a "blog" , it is a wealth of "history", as well as just a forum, and phpBB is very suitable, for many reasons, compared to "discourse" , and
I did look, to see what it is,..turns out it really is more of just a "face book" social network, mailing list type thing. But also it is NOT a package available in the Debian packages, and phpBB3is available, it is very much logical to use a forum software
that is in the Debian repositories, on a forum that is on a Debian powered server, ...
This forum is also on a Debian server as well,...
------------
FUD , this forum gets a lot , more traffic then that, a lot if it though , is people browsing1) IMHO a forum that gets maybe 10-20 posts on average per day
the wealth of information it contains,
That is what a pathetic "blog" is, this forum contains much , much more, pages and pages, and you are proposing :where all the posts on the forum are displayed on the first page------
Reducing it to a "blog" that fits on 1 page, just to promote and use this pathetic "discourse",... ???----get rid some old ones?
------------------ Any way, below is a copy of the "draft" I saved,...==================
I don't know on that, until now I had never heard of it.by pylkko » is it somehow difficult to maintain a discourse forum? is it the php? in case you don't know what Discourse is:
My reasons for using phpBB , is because that is the forum software I have the
most experience with, also a big reason, it is in the Debian repos,:
There are many types of "forum software", and most of them I can not stand, I have all ways been comfortable with the phpBB, and since it is in the debian repos, and I prefer to keep everything using debain packages , any way, I did, look, at the 'discourse'https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/phpbb3Package: phpbb3 (3.0.10-4+deb7u3)
full-featured, skinnable non-threaded web forum
phpBB is a high powered, fully scalable, and highly customizable bulletin board, with a user-friendly interface, simple and straightforward administration panel, and helpful FAQ.
It supports a choice of database back-ends.
but as far as I can tell it is not in the Debian repos, besides that,
Oh, by the way , your link is not really valid, it says the page does not exist, but I did
find it, and this:
Discourse is an open source Internet forum and mailing list management software application founded in 2013 by Jeff Atwood, Robin Ward, and Sam Saffron.[2] Discourse received funding from First Round Capital and Greylock Partners.[3]
From a usability perspective, Discourse breaks with existing forum software by including features recently popularized by large social networks,
Well, that killed my interest, to start with, I am not interested in creating a mailing list,
I kind of hate them, but also am not interested in anything that has the so called "features", recently popularized by large "social networks",...sounds to much like facebook and twitter to me,...
Phpbb and also SMF , have been popular on many programming forums, and with
the code boxes, and features like that they are excellent forum software when it is
necessary to be posting code and scripts.
I suppose , that is one reason so many newcomers don't use the code boxes, they
have never seen that kind of feature, have no clue as to how to use it or what it is for, and mostly have never used anything except the newer, popularized "social networks". I don't know on that. But in any way, a discussion on what forum software is best,
is not really what I had in mind when I started this thread.
====================================================
@pylkko I don't think this forum is a good place to be trying to promote
"discourse" , it is not even available as a Debian package, and really has nothing
to do with Debian
"What we expect you have already Done"
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
Random musings in no particular order...
1) I suspect that the OP is well-intentioned, but a meaningful, substantive discussion on questions of categorization and classification requires some fairly specialized domain knowledge. Library schools devote at least two complete semester-long courses to covering just the technical basics.
2) Even with that domain knowledge, there is still no "one size fits all" answer. Information-seeking behavior is complex and multideterminate, affected by everything from personal preference to the imprecision of everyday language. In that sense, the only "best" solution is one that supports multiple strategies.
3) Optimal number of categories has nothing to do with inflow rate. Rather, it has to do with the overall size of the "collection." That is to say, any static collection of 500,000 items will benefit from some sort of categorization, even if no additional items are added to the collection.
4) All formal systems (including classification schemes) are inherently arbitrary and incomplete. There is no fix.
1) I suspect that the OP is well-intentioned, but a meaningful, substantive discussion on questions of categorization and classification requires some fairly specialized domain knowledge. Library schools devote at least two complete semester-long courses to covering just the technical basics.
2) Even with that domain knowledge, there is still no "one size fits all" answer. Information-seeking behavior is complex and multideterminate, affected by everything from personal preference to the imprecision of everyday language. In that sense, the only "best" solution is one that supports multiple strategies.
3) Optimal number of categories has nothing to do with inflow rate. Rather, it has to do with the overall size of the "collection." That is to say, any static collection of 500,000 items will benefit from some sort of categorization, even if no additional items are added to the collection.
4) All formal systems (including classification schemes) are inherently arbitrary and incomplete. There is no fix.
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
In relation to the number of posts daily,
more then 100 new posts , ...
I have not done the research to calculate the daily average, but I am pretty
sure it is much higher the 10 or 20.
View new posts1) IMHO a forum that gets maybe 10-20 posts on average per day, doesn't necessarily need 13 distinct subforums.
and that is just this morning, there are many "days" , or 24 hour periods, withSearch found 16 matches
more then 100 new posts , ...
I have not done the research to calculate the daily average, but I am pretty
sure it is much higher the 10 or 20.
"What we expect you have already Done"
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
Given that many of the subforums have posts that don't appear to belong there, I thought that a solution could be to reorganize the categories some how (as opposed to say having some one move the posts around all the time). While dasein is right that it is hard to say what the best solution is since people have difference needs etc (relativizing the point, so to speak) I don't think that has much to do with the fact that the categories as they are now do not appear to be working perfectly. That is, if the criteria is that they should for the sake of signal-to-noise contain things that they describe, then clearly a forum that says in the description "no support posts" should not have support posts in it.
But I don't want to make an issue out of a non-issue if people in general feel that the categories as is serve a purpose and that they indeed work.
Also, I think that some people feel that the signal-to-noise ratio is low because quite often people from Kali et al. come along and post a question, after which several people have to go through the ritual of telling them why Kali is not Debian etc. But, then again, I don't know if that is an issue either.
I think that this thread is done.
But I don't want to make an issue out of a non-issue if people in general feel that the categories as is serve a purpose and that they indeed work.
Also, I think that some people feel that the signal-to-noise ratio is low because quite often people from Kali et al. come along and post a question, after which several people have to go through the ritual of telling them why Kali is not Debian etc. But, then again, I don't know if that is an issue either.
I think that this thread is done.
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
No.pylkko wrote:Because there are so many Kali/Raspbian/other "Debian-based" support questions, and there might be issues that people here can help with, would it maybe make sense to a have separate area for those people where it is explicitly said that you are not allowed to expect similar support as for Debian, but that if you are lucky and nice about it, maybe you can get some help here.
These boards are supplied for free by some very kind people and are not covered by the usual Debian donations, AFAIK.
I think the least we can do is respect their generous investment by keeping the troubleshooting Debian-specific.
You can push the foreigners over to https://forums.bunsenlabs.org/ if you want, we are financed and have an open support mandate.
deadbang
- eor2004
- Posts: 251
- Joined: 2013-10-01 22:49
- Location: Puerto Rico
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
Just an opinion but, I think newbies using Kali Linux doesn't get answers to their questions on Kali forums because the developers expect users of Kali to have some experience with linux, Kali is not a linux for newbies or the average linux desktop user, Kali is for the experienced or somewhat experienced linux user, I always wonder why somebody new to linux would choose a advanced distro like Kali to start with, it always baffles me, IMHO Kali and/or Debian developers and users doesn't have time to loose trying to help somebody using Kali for other uses than for what it was created or intended for!
Debian 12 Gnome on a MSI H61M-P25 (B3) PC & on a Dell Latitude E6410 & HP EliteBook 8540p Laptops.
LMDE 6 on a Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 Laptop.
Bodhi Linux 7 on a HP Compaq DC5750 Small Form Factor PC.
Windows 11 on a Intel DH55TC PC.
LMDE 6 on a Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 Laptop.
Bodhi Linux 7 on a HP Compaq DC5750 Small Form Factor PC.
Windows 11 on a Intel DH55TC PC.
- eor2004
- Posts: 251
- Joined: 2013-10-01 22:49
- Location: Puerto Rico
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
There's http://www.linuxquestions.org/ too!Head_on_a_Stick wrote:You can push the foreigners over to https://forums.bunsenlabs.org/ if you want, we are financed and have an open support mandate.
Debian 12 Gnome on a MSI H61M-P25 (B3) PC & on a Dell Latitude E6410 & HP EliteBook 8540p Laptops.
LMDE 6 on a Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 Laptop.
Bodhi Linux 7 on a HP Compaq DC5750 Small Form Factor PC.
Windows 11 on a Intel DH55TC PC.
LMDE 6 on a Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 Laptop.
Bodhi Linux 7 on a HP Compaq DC5750 Small Form Factor PC.
Windows 11 on a Intel DH55TC PC.
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
http://gb.imdb.com/title/tt4158110/eor2004 wrote:I always wonder why somebody new to linux would choose a advanced distro like Kali to start with, it always baffles me
EDIT: Yes indeed, LQ rocks
deadbang
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
"season_2.0" (sic) :chuckle:Head_on_a_Stick wrote:http://gb.imdb.com/title/tt4158110/
and that face under that hood! such earnest suffering!
:lol:
anyhow; subforum: YES
discourse: NO (it's all javascript, sluggish, painful to navigate, just like facebook...)
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
Yes this is true, and that is what the "report" button is for, as well a reporting spam,-----then clearly a forum that says in the description "no support posts" should not have support posts in it
a moderator will decide if it really needs to be moved. They do move quite a
few posts. But also some get missed, especially when no one reports them.
"What we expect you have already Done"
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
Because they watched the latest episode of Mr. Robot and feel über cool and h4¢k3r_L1k3 using it.eor2004 wrote:I always wonder why somebody new to linux would choose a advanced distro like Kali to start with
- eor2004
- Posts: 251
- Joined: 2013-10-01 22:49
- Location: Puerto Rico
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
Oh, so that's why? thanks for clarifying it, so these guys think that installing Kali Linux will magically turn them into hackers overnight? IMHO that's very stupid, it is like a baby trying to walk before crawling, don't you think so?
Debian 12 Gnome on a MSI H61M-P25 (B3) PC & on a Dell Latitude E6410 & HP EliteBook 8540p Laptops.
LMDE 6 on a Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 Laptop.
Bodhi Linux 7 on a HP Compaq DC5750 Small Form Factor PC.
Windows 11 on a Intel DH55TC PC.
LMDE 6 on a Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 Laptop.
Bodhi Linux 7 on a HP Compaq DC5750 Small Form Factor PC.
Windows 11 on a Intel DH55TC PC.
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
My admittedly untestable, pre-Mr.Robot speculation is here: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php? ... 15#p559098eor2004 wrote:I always wonder why somebody new to linux would choose a advanced distro like Kali to start with
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
Forum software is often mistaken as being a simple discussion tool, somewhat related to social networking. And indeed in fact it actually is - but that is only a part of it.
It is even more importantly: An information repository. A library of information in the truest sense of the word. It is the primary purpose of what i use mine for.
Categories as indices. Sure there are aberrant entries, but over the long term it is a better form of information storage than the typical web page or blog software. Especially since subcategorization is trivial on most forum software (that I have seen - I use MyBB).
That said, there can certainly be improvements, not only to this forum, but to the forum concept in general. One particular issue is netiquette, which refrains on 'necroposting'- ideally one should post resolutions to problems encountered regardless of how old they are. In fairness there is more opinion than engineering on these types of forums, and debating some things such as gnome vs kde can get old after a while.
OFF TOPIC should be an unmoderated forum were anything goes, for the simple reason that people should be allowed to prattle about gibberish, in between working on the technical aspects of their systems. Like being able to take a coffee break without going down the street.
Ideally it should auto-delete posts after a few months, so that people can get some joy from reposting their cat pictures.
And Fluffy can stay forever a kitten.
It is even more importantly: An information repository. A library of information in the truest sense of the word. It is the primary purpose of what i use mine for.
Categories as indices. Sure there are aberrant entries, but over the long term it is a better form of information storage than the typical web page or blog software. Especially since subcategorization is trivial on most forum software (that I have seen - I use MyBB).
That said, there can certainly be improvements, not only to this forum, but to the forum concept in general. One particular issue is netiquette, which refrains on 'necroposting'- ideally one should post resolutions to problems encountered regardless of how old they are. In fairness there is more opinion than engineering on these types of forums, and debating some things such as gnome vs kde can get old after a while.
OFF TOPIC should be an unmoderated forum were anything goes, for the simple reason that people should be allowed to prattle about gibberish, in between working on the technical aspects of their systems. Like being able to take a coffee break without going down the street.
Ideally it should auto-delete posts after a few months, so that people can get some joy from reposting their cat pictures.
And Fluffy can stay forever a kitten.
Re: Suggestion: new subforum and get rid some old ones?
In the announcements subforum there is a post announcing the release of Wheezy, but no equivalent for Jessie. There was a announcement post for Jessie (I remember it) but apparently it is in some other subforum.
The most confusing is when you want to post about news related to new Debian releases/development. Should it go into 1) News and Announcements, 2) General, 3) Off-Topic, or 4) Debian Development. You would think that announcements of releases are not "development" but there are several announcements about point releases in development. You would think that "General" is for support, but if you look inside, you notice that this is not the reality. You would think that Off topic is not for posts about Debian but other stuff, but the moderators here have many times stated (and there is a sticky saying also) that non-Debian post are not to be posted on the forum at all, which then raises a question about the purpose of Off-topic.
It is clear that the categorization is unnecessarily unintuitive for posters and caters to no functional need. I don't think that anyone here uses the main page and the categories. But it was concluded in the discussion that even if so, this does not warrant change. So you are necrobumping not only in a historical sense, but also from a discussiony sort of perspective.
Personally I think this is a design flaw in phpBB. The categories should be displayed only upon request and not as the main entry point to the content. Furthermore, if they were "tags" or keywords, they would not be mutually exclusive and one could appoint a post to several at once.
The most confusing is when you want to post about news related to new Debian releases/development. Should it go into 1) News and Announcements, 2) General, 3) Off-Topic, or 4) Debian Development. You would think that announcements of releases are not "development" but there are several announcements about point releases in development. You would think that "General" is for support, but if you look inside, you notice that this is not the reality. You would think that Off topic is not for posts about Debian but other stuff, but the moderators here have many times stated (and there is a sticky saying also) that non-Debian post are not to be posted on the forum at all, which then raises a question about the purpose of Off-topic.
It is clear that the categorization is unnecessarily unintuitive for posters and caters to no functional need. I don't think that anyone here uses the main page and the categories. But it was concluded in the discussion that even if so, this does not warrant change. So you are necrobumping not only in a historical sense, but also from a discussiony sort of perspective.
Personally I think this is a design flaw in phpBB. The categories should be displayed only upon request and not as the main entry point to the content. Furthermore, if they were "tags" or keywords, they would not be mutually exclusive and one could appoint a post to several at once.