I've had both Windows & Macs. I currently have a Mac mini & a MacBook Pro. I'm interested in trying out Linux. I've spent hours on DistroWatch & YouTube & Google researching Linux. I want to install VirtualBox & try out different distros of Linux. I researched the different package managers. For 1 reason or another I eliminated all but Debian.
I've spent hours on DistroWatch & I can search for distros based on Debian, Debian (stable), Debian (tested) & Debian (unstable). I've noticed that some of the Linux distros are based on Debian (unstable). Why would anybody want a Linux distro based on Debian (unstable)? Wouldn't it crash frequently?
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Debian testing
Re: Debian testing
Debian has no release cycle. Therefore, it can be years in between releases. So, other Debian based distros, use unstable as a base because it's constantly changing as new source code is released. It means they can provide a more "up to date" release of software at the expense of being potentially "unstable". But they do patch their software quite extensively in order to combat instabilities.
ASRock H77 Pro4-M i7 3770K - 32GB RAM - Pioneer BDR-209D
-
- Emeritus
- Posts: 2435
- Joined: 2010-12-07 19:55
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: Debian testing
Stable is recommended for the average user. It contains tried and tested packages, but they tend to be older versions.
Unstable is not as unstable as its name suggests can be used to more experienced users, who know what they are doing and how to recover from a problem should it occur. It contains packages which are being tried out and they tend to be newer versions. Many of the experienced users of unstable can, with care, go for quite some time by avoiding problems.
Unstable is not as unstable as its name suggests can be used to more experienced users, who know what they are doing and how to recover from a problem should it occur. It contains packages which are being tried out and they tend to be newer versions. Many of the experienced users of unstable can, with care, go for quite some time by avoiding problems.
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
Re: Debian testing
Jessie is also having more trouble working out of the box with brand-new hardware than Wheezydid at the same point in its reign as stable, at least that what it seems to me from the number of posts with that problem. It's easier for a derivative to circumvent the issue by starting from a testing base, though it's not impossible for a Jessie-based one.
MX Linux packager and developer
- None1975
- df -h | participant
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
- Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Debian testing
Hello. You can read excellent Debian FAQ https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/. By the way, if you choose Debian, Debian wiki is your friend!dcs.79c wrote:I've had both Windows & Macs. I currently have a Mac mini & a MacBook Pro. I'm interested in trying out Linux. I've spent hours on DistroWatch & YouTube & Google researching Linux. I want to install VirtualBox & try out different distros of Linux. I researched the different package managers. For 1 reason or another I eliminated all but Debian.
I've spent hours on DistroWatch & I can search for distros based on Debian, Debian (stable), Debian (tested) & Debian (unstable). I've noticed that some of the Linux distros are based on Debian (unstable). Why would anybody want a Linux distro based on Debian (unstable)? Wouldn't it crash frequently?
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Re: Debian testing
After I sent this thread, I read on the internet that Ubuntu uses the unstable version of Debian. I didn't know that.
This will be my first foray into Linux.
This will be my first foray into Linux.
Re: Debian testing
This is also in the FAQ but Debian stable is also based on Debian unstable. A snapshot of it is taken and then bugs patcheddcs.79c wrote:After I sent this thread, I read on the internet that Ubuntu uses the unstable version of Debian. I didn't know that.
This will be my first foray into Linux.
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
Re: Debian testing
Yes, this was the main problems I had with both Linux Mint andby dcs.79c » Why would anybody want a Linux distro based on Debian (unstable)? Wouldn't it crash frequently?
Ubuntu, they both were very unreliable, and crashed frequently.
Usually when ever there were updates/upgrades.
But many people don't seem to mind that.
As for the many other distros, I don't know, I have not tried them.
"What we expect you have already Done"
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
Re: Debian testing
Ubuntu is based on Debian & there are distros that are based on Ubuntu. I wonder if the distro possibly becomes more unstable the further it gets from "pure" Debian.
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
Re: Debian testing
Unstable does not mean that programs will necessarily crash constantly; it just means the foundation of the system is subject to change. However, the programs could contain bugs, the lengthy Debian development cycle is meant to squash as many of those as possible before the stable version goes stable...that is, there have to be no known release-critical bugs left before stable is released. That's not the case with distros that release by date. Obviously they release with known bugs, such as Ubuntu 16.04 with its network-manager problems, just to meet the schedule.
MX Linux packager and developer