Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
I have been using Debian and Ubuntu alternately for about 10 years. Now I'm with Ubuntu 16.04 in my main desktop computer, and I'm pretty pissed off by its instability. I will be switching to Stretch as soon as it comes out.
Ubuntu entices you with its latest versions of all programs, and everything looks beautiful with a simple interface and easy configuration for the end user. Eye candy.
Now when it comes to stability I have to say it is a piece of garbage.
I usually use audacity and man, it's unusable. Kdenlive also crashes often, and today even the GIMP segfaulted in my face.
In terms of stability Debian takes the cake, but software is usually dated and not updated. Maybe you could face the situation where you need a certain version of a program that isn't compatible with the system's glibc version and then you can't re-compile the whole system, so... you need a virtual machine. And good luck with that if you have a slow computer.
And in your experience, is it really so much more stable than Ubuntu?
I want to know what regular/somewhat advanced Desktop users could tell me about their experiences.
Any constructive input would be appreciated.
Ubuntu entices you with its latest versions of all programs, and everything looks beautiful with a simple interface and easy configuration for the end user. Eye candy.
Now when it comes to stability I have to say it is a piece of garbage.
I usually use audacity and man, it's unusable. Kdenlive also crashes often, and today even the GIMP segfaulted in my face.
In terms of stability Debian takes the cake, but software is usually dated and not updated. Maybe you could face the situation where you need a certain version of a program that isn't compatible with the system's glibc version and then you can't re-compile the whole system, so... you need a virtual machine. And good luck with that if you have a slow computer.
And in your experience, is it really so much more stable than Ubuntu?
I want to know what regular/somewhat advanced Desktop users could tell me about their experiences.
Any constructive input would be appreciated.
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
Debian-vs-Ubuntu has been covered thousands of times in hundreds of venues over a period of >10 years. Go read all of that existing trollbait and report back if you have actual questions.
Install Debian in a VM, or on a spare hard drive, or burn a live medium. Experiment. Decide for yourself. Just be prepared to spend significantly more time and effort setting up Debian.
Install Debian in a VM, or on a spare hard drive, or burn a live medium. Experiment. Decide for yourself. Just be prepared to spend significantly more time and effort setting up Debian.
- sunrat
- Administrator
- Posts: 6412
- Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Has thanked: 116 times
- Been thanked: 462 times
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
Yes. As long as you install packages made for Debian.mfv wrote:And in your experience, is it really so much more stable than Ubuntu?
Ubuntu are much less strict about what random packages are installable, especially PPAs. PPA quality varies from perfect to dangerous. I'm no fan of Ubuntu but your crashes are possibly due to some incompatibilities introduced by packages you installed or configuration rather than Ubuntu itself.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
I don't know your level of computer/Linux/Debian skills, and I don't know your notion of "good".
And I don't use stable (and I don't use KDE), so maybe all of this is irrelevant to you.
But I switched from Ubuntu to Debian testing many years ago and never looked back.
The problem with stable is that the packages tend to be really old versions.
But testing is (for me at least) a nice compromise between recent versions and stability (testing is not experimental mind you).
So my take is: Yes stable is (probably) quite good and if you run a critical server you may consider it but for a desktop system I'd recommend testing.
And I don't use stable (and I don't use KDE), so maybe all of this is irrelevant to you.
But I switched from Ubuntu to Debian testing many years ago and never looked back.
The problem with stable is that the packages tend to be really old versions.
But testing is (for me at least) a nice compromise between recent versions and stability (testing is not experimental mind you).
So my take is: Yes stable is (probably) quite good and if you run a critical server you may consider it but for a desktop system I'd recommend testing.
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
I think I'll give "testing" a try. It sounds reasonable. I have never used it in a production system because of fear of instability and the notion that it's not, well, stable. But after Ubuntu...
I think that what they may have gotten right with the dreadful PPAs is that you don't want to update all your system to use a single piece of software. And if you are an end user, family desktop pc, you don't want to sit and compile the latest qt to get X application running.
Does testing get "broken" more often in terms of packages? Should I hand pick what to update or should I update everything everyday? Did you ever have to do a complete system re-install because of this?
Thanks for the constructive input.
I think that what they may have gotten right with the dreadful PPAs is that you don't want to update all your system to use a single piece of software. And if you are an end user, family desktop pc, you don't want to sit and compile the latest qt to get X application running.
Does testing get "broken" more often in terms of packages? Should I hand pick what to update or should I update everything everyday? Did you ever have to do a complete system re-install because of this?
Thanks for the constructive input.
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
If one imagines that "life with eternal upgrades" qualifies as "reasonable."mfv wrote:I think I'll give "testing" a try. It sounds reasonable.
Yes. That's why they call it "Testing." (Catchy name, huh?) And yes, sometimes the breakage is catastrophic. And some of those times, the fix is slow to come.mfv wrote:Does testing get "broken" more often in terms of packages?
So if stability is your supposed reason for ditching Ubuntu, it's unclear why you would pick something that's, well, not stable.
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
Yes. For me, it is.Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
The Ubuntu LTS releases have worked out well for me here, too, though. Not quite as "solid" as Stable, but not all that bad.
I don't like to mess with Testing until a few weeks after the Testing freeze, but that's just me. A friend of mine has been running Stretch/Testing since (I think) last summer without issues (or so he tells me).
Depends on what you do with your system, I guess. I keep Stable on my "main" machine, and I have a few other distros/installations on other computers (Arch, Ubuntu LTS, Debian Testing for the past few months, etc.). For sure, other users report different experiences than what I've seen here. As they say, "YMMV."
- alan stone
- Posts: 269
- Joined: 2011-10-22 14:08
- Location: In my body.
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
A friendly suggestion.mfv wrote:... I will be switching to Stretch as soon as it comes out.
Ubuntu entices you with its latest versions of all programs, and everything looks beautiful...
Now when it comes to stability I have to say it is a piece of garbage.
In terms of stability Debian takes the cake,
And in your experience, is it really so much more stable than Ubuntu?
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
Hello,
I moved from Ubuntu to Debian for two years.
Don't want to go back at any price...
I moved from Ubuntu to Debian for two years.
Don't want to go back at any price...
- Hallvor
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: 2009-04-16 18:35
- Location: Kristiansand, Norway
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 206 times
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
I would suggest another way of attaining knowledge than anecdotes from random people on the Internet.
You need to decide: Do you want stable or recent?
You want it all, but you can't have it. If you want a compromise, I guess Ubuntu is fine.
You need to decide: Do you want stable or recent?
You want it all, but you can't have it. If you want a compromise, I guess Ubuntu is fine.
[HowTo] Install and configure Debian bookworm
Debian 12 | KDE Plasma | ThinkPad T440s | 4 × Intel® Core™ i7-4600U CPU @ 2.10GHz | 12 GiB RAM | Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | 1 TB SSD
Debian 12 | KDE Plasma | ThinkPad T440s | 4 × Intel® Core™ i7-4600U CPU @ 2.10GHz | 12 GiB RAM | Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | 1 TB SSD
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
Yes, if someone wants stability Debian Testing doesn't really make much sense. I'm not sure why it would be more stable than, say, Ubuntu. Sure it will give you more control and you won't have to deal with broken PPAs and such but that's it. Unless you have a more credible reason to choose Debian Testing over Ubuntu, I don't think it is such a good idea. Ditto for Sid (Sid and Testing aren't that far apart, just that Sid breaks more often while Testing does not).dasein wrote:If one imagines that "life with eternal upgrades" qualifies as "reasonable."mfv wrote:I think I'll give "testing" a try. It sounds reasonable.
Yes. That's why they call it "Testing." (Catchy name, huh?) And yes, sometimes the breakage is catastrophic. And some of those times, the fix is slow to come.mfv wrote:Does testing get "broken" more often in terms of packages?
So if stability is your supposed reason for ditching Ubuntu, it's unclear why you would pick something that's, well, not stable.
Why not go for Debian Stretch with the backports repo? It makes much more sense since you need stability and the backports repo has usually reasonably newer software than Stable. Check this thread out for more backported software: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=127574
The source code for the kernel, library, etc. should fit on one diskette. Sources for the GNU utilities will vary (and will be big). The sources to GNU emacs will take at least 3 disks. -- Theodore Ts'o, 1992 (distributing the first Linux disks)
- rivenathos
- Posts: 217
- Joined: 2009-01-09 11:57
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
I have been running Debian Stable since Etch. Yes, Debian Stable makes for an excellent desktop distro, especially if you want everything to work properly all the time. I hate surprises, and with other distros such as Ubuntu, things would change/break with regularity. With Debian, I set everything up once, ride for a few years, then upgrade to the next stable version. Solid reliability.
Running Debian on Dell: OptiPlex 3010, OptiPlex 7010, OptiPlex 9010, and Inspiron 1545.
Linux User #461545
Savannah, Georgia, USA
Linux User #461545
Savannah, Georgia, USA
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
I've been using Debian too, for a desktop/laptop daily use it's great but those outdated packages seem to be the problem, I don't blame Debian it is (Arguably) the most stable linux distro out there, and it's just not worth it to sacrifice that title for a desktop distro, but everything seems to work just fine, for my laptop i use Debian testing, for me it's the perfect balance between Stability & current packages (That is when Debian is not frozen)
I would exchange everything I know in exchange for half of what I don't.
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
If you want stable and are interested in Debian then choose stable. if you complain about Ubuntu crashing then using Debian testing or Sid/unstable does not make much sense.
Ubuntu LTS is based off testing and Ubuntu 6 month release is based off Debian Sid, although testing and Sid do seem more stable then Ubuntu, they are still by no means stable and anyone claiming otherwise is most likely lying. Just like anyone claiming to use Arch for 3+ years and no crashes is well ......
Ubuntu LTS is based off testing and Ubuntu 6 month release is based off Debian Sid, although testing and Sid do seem more stable then Ubuntu, they are still by no means stable and anyone claiming otherwise is most likely lying. Just like anyone claiming to use Arch for 3+ years and no crashes is well ......
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
unless you are a developer and need the latest packages then having them is useless towards the effectiveness of Debian as a workstation/desktop etc...VentGrey wrote:I've been using Debian too, for a desktop/laptop daily use it's great but those outdated packages seem to be the problem, I don't blame Debian it is (Arguably) the most stable linux distro out there, and it's just not worth it to sacrifice that title for a desktop distro, but everything seems to work just fine, for my laptop i use Debian testing, for me it's the perfect balance between Stability & current packages (That is when Debian is not frozen)
Debian testing is also the least likely to receive security updates in a timely manner and has the most holes and bugs that can last weeks or months. Keep that in mind as you surf the net, Debian Sid and Stable have security updates.
- sunrat
- Administrator
- Posts: 6412
- Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Has thanked: 116 times
- Been thanked: 462 times
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
Not exactly. Stable has the Debian security team. In Sid updates come from the package maintainers and eventually get to Testing.HuangLao wrote:...Debian Sid and Stable have security updates.
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUnstable# ... updates.3F
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: 2015-06-07 14:38
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
I've only had Jessie on my laptop for a week or so now. The difference between Jessie and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS is mind boggling.
Zero problems whatsoever. I've managed to keep an almost pure Debian system. Only non-official packages are the insynchq repository for google drive, and I backported makemkv from the ubuntu ppa. Otherwise everything is official debian repositories. It has been a dream come true how solid everything is, and everything works first time every time.
Some people go on about needing the newest versions of programs and apps. I disagree. The majority of the time, what has changed as far as the end user is concerned? Nothing. Even the older versions in Debian still get security updates so it is a wash. I personally don't need the absolute latest version of whatever and I rarely see why anyone else needs them as well.
In my mind your desktop / laptop should be rock solid and reliable. Constantly having to fix this or that is not my idea of enjoyable computer use. Most people I know don't like that either. Near as I understand most people just want their computer to work with no fuss. Debian does just that. It doesn't fight with me, it does what I want, when I want and that is all I need.
Zero problems whatsoever. I've managed to keep an almost pure Debian system. Only non-official packages are the insynchq repository for google drive, and I backported makemkv from the ubuntu ppa. Otherwise everything is official debian repositories. It has been a dream come true how solid everything is, and everything works first time every time.
Some people go on about needing the newest versions of programs and apps. I disagree. The majority of the time, what has changed as far as the end user is concerned? Nothing. Even the older versions in Debian still get security updates so it is a wash. I personally don't need the absolute latest version of whatever and I rarely see why anyone else needs them as well.
In my mind your desktop / laptop should be rock solid and reliable. Constantly having to fix this or that is not my idea of enjoyable computer use. Most people I know don't like that either. Near as I understand most people just want their computer to work with no fuss. Debian does just that. It doesn't fight with me, it does what I want, when I want and that is all I need.
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
sunrat wrote:Not exactly. Stable has the Debian security team. In Sid updates come from the package maintainers and eventually get to Testing.HuangLao wrote:...Debian Sid and Stable have security updates.
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUnstable# ... updates.3F
Yup, I was counting the new packages as security updates...but technically they are not.
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
But does not Debian Stable contain many bugs, but that aren't considered as being security risks and as such don't get fixed, just recorded. Hundreds in Jessie for instance.
Tempted to switch over to FreeBSD from Debian after some months of usage but having discovered that. Very early days however (just installed FreeBSD into a VirtualBox just a day ago).
Tempted to switch over to FreeBSD from Debian after some months of usage but having discovered that. Very early days however (just installed FreeBSD into a VirtualBox just a day ago).
Re: Is Debian stable a good desktop distribution?
We use Debian Stable with backports as needed for newer stuff. You still get the security updates, and the most popular/important newer stuff is pre-packaged specifically for use with Stable, often right from SID.
For example, Stable/Jessie has backports from SID for Libreoffice, Inkscape, xserver-xorg-video-intel, and newer kernels are available as well.
For example, Stable/Jessie has backports from SID for Libreoffice, Inkscape, xserver-xorg-video-intel, and newer kernels are available as well.