by kereberos » Pushing non-standard unstable software without proper documentation and old, thus misleading, documentation into a stable distro. Sounds not smart.
There are 2 sides to that coin, and one can look through the forum and see
countless posts complaining and pushing for Debian to be "new and shiny",
like some of the other distros, and all though I am not positive on this , I do
suspect there was a lot of "pressure" from others, to try to get the new release
ASP, maybe many users need to think about it twice, before pressuring the "cooks" and trying to tell them to, "hurry up , just serve the "free meal",.. we don't like to wait, ... well now we see the results, a meal was served, not really ready to
eat,.. and the complaining continues.
There is documentation available in Debian about how all worked before (the UNIX way) and at the same time that documentation is outdated and does not work because there is systemd and some guys decided to push it inside Debian
Yes this is quite true, and is my reasons for sticking with "old stable" and Debian versions that are well established, and were released, before the "Big bang", so
to speak,..
Have you ever even thought about trying to help update the outdated documentation ? I have my doubts .
Even just user can join the wiki, and help with that, and there is a very real need for this,..
The same for the Debian.org web site, how ever it is some what more complicated, and that probably is part of the problem there.
by kereberos » Brilliant. GTFO.
You are a real winner, brilliant,...and of course you are all ways right, in any event , no point in arguing with a troll, it is a pointless waste of time, and there are 100s of pages on the wiki that need spanish translations, as well as being updated,... so any way,... that is all from me. I do have better things to do.
YES