Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Do live Debian images have a future?
- None1975
- df -h | participant
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
- Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Do live Debian images have a future?
This is from debian@devel.list.debian.org
[ Note the cross-posting... ]
Hey folks,
Background: we released live images for Stretch using new tooling,namely live-wrapper. It is better than what we had before (live-build)in a number of ways, particularly in terms of build reliability and some important new features (e.g. UEFI support). But it's also less mature and has seen less testing. There have been bugs because of that. I have fixes for most of the ones I know about, and I'm still working on more bugfixes yet. While the bugs are annoying, what worries me more is that they were only spotted in release builds. There had been testing versions of live images available for multiple weeks beforehand, presumably with the same bugs included. (Almost) none of them reported. This shows that we don't have enough people using these live images and/or caring about filing bugs. We have a similar lack of involvement in terms of the content of the live images. As I said above, I'm happy that we now have a reliable tool for building our live images - that makes my life much easier. But I honestly have no idea if the multiple desktop-specific live images are actually reasonable representations of each of the desktops. For example, I *seriously* hope that normal KDE installations are not effected by #865382 like our live KDE images. Validation by the various desktop teams would be useful here. The current situation is *not* good enough. I ended up getting involved in live image production because the images needed making, and I was already the main person organising production of Debian's official images. To be frank, I had (and still have) no direct use for the live images myself and I don't *particularly* care about them all that much. Despite that, I've ended up spending a lot of time working
on them. A few other people have also spent a lot of time working in this area - thanks are due to those people too. But it's still not enough. If our live images are going to be good enough to meet the standards that Debian users deserve and expect, we need *consistent*, *sustained* involvement from a lot more people. Please tell me if you're going to help. If we don't see a radical improvement soon, I'll simply disable building live images altogether to remove the false promises they're making.
Now guys, what you thinking about? For me, live iso is useless...
[ Note the cross-posting... ]
Hey folks,
Background: we released live images for Stretch using new tooling,namely live-wrapper. It is better than what we had before (live-build)in a number of ways, particularly in terms of build reliability and some important new features (e.g. UEFI support). But it's also less mature and has seen less testing. There have been bugs because of that. I have fixes for most of the ones I know about, and I'm still working on more bugfixes yet. While the bugs are annoying, what worries me more is that they were only spotted in release builds. There had been testing versions of live images available for multiple weeks beforehand, presumably with the same bugs included. (Almost) none of them reported. This shows that we don't have enough people using these live images and/or caring about filing bugs. We have a similar lack of involvement in terms of the content of the live images. As I said above, I'm happy that we now have a reliable tool for building our live images - that makes my life much easier. But I honestly have no idea if the multiple desktop-specific live images are actually reasonable representations of each of the desktops. For example, I *seriously* hope that normal KDE installations are not effected by #865382 like our live KDE images. Validation by the various desktop teams would be useful here. The current situation is *not* good enough. I ended up getting involved in live image production because the images needed making, and I was already the main person organising production of Debian's official images. To be frank, I had (and still have) no direct use for the live images myself and I don't *particularly* care about them all that much. Despite that, I've ended up spending a lot of time working
on them. A few other people have also spent a lot of time working in this area - thanks are due to those people too. But it's still not enough. If our live images are going to be good enough to meet the standards that Debian users deserve and expect, we need *consistent*, *sustained* involvement from a lot more people. Please tell me if you're going to help. If we don't see a radical improvement soon, I'll simply disable building live images altogether to remove the false promises they're making.
Now guys, what you thinking about? For me, live iso is useless...
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
given they have uefi support, i will try one out
Desktop: A320M-A PRO MAX, AMD Ryzen 5 3600, GALAX GeForce RTX™ 2060 Super EX (1-Click OC) - Sid, Win10, Arch Linux, Gentoo, Solus
Laptop: hp 250 G8 i3 11th Gen - Sid
Kodi: AMD Athlon 5150 APU w/Radeon HD 8400 - Sid
Laptop: hp 250 G8 i3 11th Gen - Sid
Kodi: AMD Athlon 5150 APU w/Radeon HD 8400 - Sid
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
So that people can see what really was written,...
Here is a link that works:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2 ... 00335.html
I am confused by this:
One thing that is clear, those of us that do find Live images useful, if we want
to keep having them, some people need to start helping out with this.
Here is my excuse, I did try a live image, but it actually was several months
before the recent release, and I did not encounter any of the problems
that showed up in the release. So no problems, nothing to report.
Some things must have changed, during the time after I downloaded one, but before the release.
I have noticed here on the forum, we have a lot of members wanting to use
the Debian testing, but seem to have next to none or no interest in helping, and using it the way it is intended, many (me included) do not have the skill to fix the bugs, but instead of crying here, when things don't work they should be communicating with the developers, let them know what iso/image they are using, and exactly what the problem is.
Lately, with the new release, and not just the Live Images, but generally I have seen many "complaints", Disappointed, because the "free meal" was not good enough for them,....... Not one of the complainers asked how they could help to
improve Debian, or at least help keep it as reliable as the past versions, not one
of them.
It is starting to look like if the Debian users want a better OS, then more of them
need to pitch in and start trying to help, some may feel the Live Iso's are of no use, but those that understand the many uses of a Live boot CD or USB device
do need to start trying to help, and also let the developers know it is important
to them.
Last note, : this should have been posted in Debian Development , maybe
a mod can move it ? Thank you.
Here is a link that works:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2 ... 00335.html
I am confused by this:
Who said that ?Now guys, what you thinking about? For me, live iso is useless
One thing that is clear, those of us that do find Live images useful, if we want
to keep having them, some people need to start helping out with this.
Steve McIntyre>> There had been testing versions of
live images available for multiple weeks beforehand, presumably with
the same bugs included. (Almost) none of them reported. This shows
that we don't have enough people using these live images and/or caring
about filing bugs.
Here is my excuse, I did try a live image, but it actually was several months
before the recent release, and I did not encounter any of the problems
that showed up in the release. So no problems, nothing to report.
Some things must have changed, during the time after I downloaded one, but before the release.
I have noticed here on the forum, we have a lot of members wanting to use
the Debian testing, but seem to have next to none or no interest in helping, and using it the way it is intended, many (me included) do not have the skill to fix the bugs, but instead of crying here, when things don't work they should be communicating with the developers, let them know what iso/image they are using, and exactly what the problem is.
Lately, with the new release, and not just the Live Images, but generally I have seen many "complaints", Disappointed, because the "free meal" was not good enough for them,....... Not one of the complainers asked how they could help to
improve Debian, or at least help keep it as reliable as the past versions, not one
of them.
It is starting to look like if the Debian users want a better OS, then more of them
need to pitch in and start trying to help, some may feel the Live Iso's are of no use, but those that understand the many uses of a Live boot CD or USB device
do need to start trying to help, and also let the developers know it is important
to them.
Last note, : this should have been posted in Debian Development , maybe
a mod can move it ? Thank you.
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
What with this along with the SystemD split (Devuan), its perhaps little wonder things aren't 'up to standard' and help/support has dwindled. I don't know the actual figures but it does feel that increasingly more packages/programs are falling into unsupported.
If the Debian trunk falters, the knock on effect to the branches will be (in the Chinese sense) 'interesting'.
If the Debian trunk falters, the knock on effect to the branches will be (in the Chinese sense) 'interesting'.
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
Thanks for the thought-provoking post.
Thoughts, in no particular order...
- Live images serve a couple of specific purposes, and a limited audience. (N.B. "limited" does not mean "unimportant"!)
- IIRC, Debian Live images had serious installation issues long before UEFI, and long before the switch to "live-wrapper." Bugs that simply were not present in standard installation images plagued Debian Live images, and those bugs remained largely unaddressed.
- One of the audiences for Live images is people looking to "test-drive" a distro in order to assess features and/or hardware compatibility. These people aren't looking to do QA for Debian, file bug reports, or jump though lots of extra hoops (e.g., disabling UEFI) in order to achieve their goal. They download the Live image, it doesn't work, they don't care why, NEXT! This constituency has been unserved/underserved for quite some time now.
- Another prime audience for Live images are people who want to do a specific respin, and not all of those folks necessarily run Debian themselves. If an interactive "live builder" is available online, it's moderately well-hidden. Which leads me to my next point...
- Asking for feedback regarding the future of Live images after "weeks" of availability strikes me as deeply disingenuous. (In fact, the entire narrative strikes me as something carefully crafted to elicit "let it die" responses.) The entire Stretch release seems to have shipped with a fair number of troubling problems, only some of which are specific to Live media. To implicitly blame all of the Live issues on insufficient QA time is a red herring.
- Debian Live images have spent a long time being incompatible with contemporary hardware, and I'm pretty sure that the rest of the world neither knows nor cares that Debian has finally joined the ranks of distros whose Live media support UEFI. I wonder aloud if Debian Live images simply have too bad a reputation among potential respinners to be taken seriously anymore (particularly compared to something like SUSE's OBS).
I feel like I have another point niggling at me, but this is probably enough grist for the mill.
Edited for clarity
Thoughts, in no particular order...
- Live images serve a couple of specific purposes, and a limited audience. (N.B. "limited" does not mean "unimportant"!)
- IIRC, Debian Live images had serious installation issues long before UEFI, and long before the switch to "live-wrapper." Bugs that simply were not present in standard installation images plagued Debian Live images, and those bugs remained largely unaddressed.
- One of the audiences for Live images is people looking to "test-drive" a distro in order to assess features and/or hardware compatibility. These people aren't looking to do QA for Debian, file bug reports, or jump though lots of extra hoops (e.g., disabling UEFI) in order to achieve their goal. They download the Live image, it doesn't work, they don't care why, NEXT! This constituency has been unserved/underserved for quite some time now.
- Another prime audience for Live images are people who want to do a specific respin, and not all of those folks necessarily run Debian themselves. If an interactive "live builder" is available online, it's moderately well-hidden. Which leads me to my next point...
- Asking for feedback regarding the future of Live images after "weeks" of availability strikes me as deeply disingenuous. (In fact, the entire narrative strikes me as something carefully crafted to elicit "let it die" responses.) The entire Stretch release seems to have shipped with a fair number of troubling problems, only some of which are specific to Live media. To implicitly blame all of the Live issues on insufficient QA time is a red herring.
- Debian Live images have spent a long time being incompatible with contemporary hardware, and I'm pretty sure that the rest of the world neither knows nor cares that Debian has finally joined the ranks of distros whose Live media support UEFI. I wonder aloud if Debian Live images simply have too bad a reputation among potential respinners to be taken seriously anymore (particularly compared to something like SUSE's OBS).
I feel like I have another point niggling at me, but this is probably enough grist for the mill.
Edited for clarity
Last edited by dasein on 2017-06-27 13:18, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
Seems like other distros' live/install images work fine. Why not Debian's?
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
I use data concentricity. For me my data, stored in a open manner (for instance RTF rather than a specific program/system format), securely, is the most valuable/irreplaceable and my PC along with offline/remote data storage/copies is the priority. Systems such as Debian (and others) are just a easily replaced means to access that data and liveCD's are just one of many tools to achieve that. With a liveCD you can boot the exact same instance each and every time, such as a pristine factory fresh image ... typically refined to ones personal requirements (locale etc.) before being cast (burnt to CD).dasein wrote:- One of the audiences for Live images is people looking to "test-drive" a distro in order to assess features and/or hardware compatibility. These people aren't looking to do QA for Debian, file bug reports, or jump though lots of extra hoops (e.g., disabling UEFI) in order to achieve their goal. They download the Live image, it doesn't work, they don't care why, NEXT!
- Another prime audience for Live images are people who want to do a specific respin, and not all of those folks necessarily run Debian themselves.
I appreciate that the majority tend to use system concentricity, but to me that opens up reliance and too much focus upon that (sometimes at the expense of risking data security). I would feel uncomfortable doing online banking using a system concentric choice that had previously been used to browse here-there-everywhere and potentially been adversely modified (hacked). As a example one of my boot choices is a cut down Debian Standard ... a initrd, vmlinuz and a 150MB main squashed filesystem ... that boots to command line. From there I can apt-get install xorg jwm pcmanfm firefox-esr and on a 100Mb link have a pristine gui desktop ready to access my data or do other stuff very quickly and all totally within ram. I can boot a wide range of other systems relatively easily using different approaches such that the loss of any one (Debian Live) is trivial ... but not irrelevant.
Would the loss of Debian Live bother me? Yes and no. Mostly I see it as just being another nail in the coffin - pushing Debian downwards from being the top, pushing more away, where a trickle can rapidly turn into a torrent. The main lead liveCD developer was pushed out. SystemD pushed others out. Naturally with each push fewer are available to potentially recruit maintainers/developers from ... a death spiral. The suggestion that livecd will be killed off due to lack of developers/testers looks to be yet another self inflicted wound.
Perhaps Debian should start pulling packages/programs having no maintainers rather than showing increasing numbers of programs available in the repository. Around 1500 in that list, perhaps many with other modules. As that might provide a indication over time of the extent of the decay.
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
Just because a package in not being 'maintained' does not mean it is not being used. Some packages are so well done they don't need 'improvements' - they just work. The fact that 'progress' tries to push them out to take control (think pulseaudio/systemd) is a sad testament to the current state of Debian and Linux in general. Users who don't have a clue, devs who will sacrifice principle to convenience and corporate interests who want to take the freedom out of free software . . . RESIST or suffer the consequences!ruffwoof wrote:Perhaps Debian should start pulling packages/programs having no maintainers rather than showing increasing numbers of programs available in the repository. Around 1500 in that list, perhaps many with other modules. As that might provide a indication over time of the extent of the decay.
May the FORK be with you!
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
Because the other distros support only a limited group of CPUs.MALsPa wrote:Seems like other distros' live/install images work fine. Why not Debian's?
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
Nope. Debian's Live images only support Intel-type chips.Danielsan wrote:Because the other distros support only a limited group of CPUs.MALsPa wrote:Seems like other distros' live/install images work fine. Why not Debian's?
Which leaves MALsPa's pointed and pertinent question hanging...
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
Because they might be using refractainstaller rather than the debian installer? The Debian installer is a temperamental beastMALsPa wrote:Seems like other distros' live/install images work fine. Why not Debian's?
May the FORK be with you!
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
My bad...dasein wrote:Nope. Debian's Live images only support Intel-type chips.Danielsan wrote:Because the other distros support only a limited group of CPUs.MALsPa wrote:Seems like other distros' live/install images work fine. Why not Debian's?
Which leaves MALsPa's pointed and pertinent question hanging...
- dilberts_left_nut
- Administrator
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: 2009-10-05 07:54
- Location: enzed
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
Because they have someone with time and interest to devote to the project.MALsPa wrote:Seems like other distros' live/install images work fine. Why not Debian's?
Seems it is not a high priority for Debian.
Whether it should be is debatable - Debian Live used to be a third party project, maybe it should be again?
As with a lot of aspects, you can do whatever you want with the system Debian provides (including generating live images), but it dosen't mean that it will necessarily be provided just the way you want.
AdrianTM wrote:There's no hacker in my grandma...
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
dilberts_left_nut wrote:Because they have someone with time and interest to devote to the project.MALsPa wrote:Seems like other distros' live/install images work fine. Why not Debian's?
This was what was niggling at me. (My thanks to MALsPa and d_l_n.)
The Live images used to be an official or non-offfical, depending on who you asked, third party effort. Some folks found the guy who ran it to be tough to work with, but everyone who worked with him spoke of his passion and devotion to the effort. Rightly or wrongly, he was forced out of his position and the Live images were taken over by someone else.
That very same "someone else" is the author of the quote in the initial post, who says in so many words that he doesn't care about the Live images, and by inference, neither does he care about the constituencies they serve.
Certainly not for its current maintainer. He clearly admits that he doesn't care, in so many wordsdilberts_left_nut wrote:Seems it is not a high priority for Debian.
Yeah, 'cause that worked so well last time.dilberts_left_nut wrote:Debian Live used to be a third party project, maybe it should be again?
And that's the thing: the current maintainer acquired the project by force, and now he's whining about how much work it is. And according to him only two possible solutions exist: he gets his way (and fast!) or he single-handedly deprives Debian of Live media.
Wow. False-dichotomy much?
The very fact that he phrased it this way shows his contempt for Live media, and for the users they serve. And he does this whole phony "cry for help" to an audience of other devs. (Yeah, cause they all have such a load of free time on their hands. )
I dunno what this guy's problem(s) with Live media (or its constituents?) are, but this project clearly needs to belong to someone who actually gives a tiny spit, which this guy admits he doesn't.
But given how badly the last external maintainer was treated, whodafugg would volunteer for that gig?
So unless someone convinces this guy to grow up, it looks like Debian will lose its Live image presence.
Lovely.
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: 2016-07-13 08:40
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
+1dasein wrote:[T]he current maintainer acquired the project by force, and now he's whining about how much work it is. And according to him only two possible solutions exist: he gets his way (and fast!) or he single-handedly deprives Debian of Live media.
Wow. False-dichotomy much?
The very fact that he phrased it this way shows his contempt for Live media, and for the users they serve. And he does this whole phony "cry for help" to an audience of other devs. (Yeah, cause they all have such a load of free time on their hands. )
I dunno what this guy's problem(s) with Live media (or its constituents?) are, but this project clearly needs to belong to someone who actually gives a tiny spit, which this guy admits he doesn't.
But given how badly the last external maintainer was treated, whodafugg would volunteer for that gig?
So unless someone convinces this guy to grow up, it looks like Debian will lose its Live image presence.
Debian GNU/Linux 9 Stretch w/Openbox
Acer Aspire E5-521G
AMD A8-6410 APU
4 GB RAM
integrated AMD Mullins
dedicated AMD Hainan Radeon R5 M240 2 GB
240 GB Toshiba Q300 SSD
Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 ethernet
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 wireless
Acer Aspire E5-521G
AMD A8-6410 APU
4 GB RAM
integrated AMD Mullins
dedicated AMD Hainan Radeon R5 M240 2 GB
240 GB Toshiba Q300 SSD
Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 ethernet
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 wireless
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
This is a good point, and it might make one wonder , what else will be next.by dasein »But given how badly the last external maintainer was treated, whodafugg would volunteer for that gig?
I am in agreement with Steve McIntyre, I think that is the point he is trying
to make, unless some one the really cares enough about maintaining some
kind of "Live images", then there is no reason to continue it, when there seems
to be very few people that even use them.
The link ruffwoof posted, it is hard to spot the way he posted it, just the word "this" :
"this" links to this ,below. It should be noted it was 2 years ago:Post by ruffwoof » 2017-06-26 13:55
What with this along ----snip---
https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/20 ... 00024.html
=================================From >> Daniel Baumann[ I don't know why this post is not showing up on planet.debian.org:
https://danieltmp.wordpress.com/2015/11 ... bian-live/
I am sending it here by mail now. ]
I don't think Steve McIntyre, is really to blame,
https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/20 ... 00025.html
An abrupt End to Debian Live
----------------------------
Debian can be great.
But depending on who you are, where you come from, and who your friends
are, Debian can also be hateful and full of deceit.
Before even more of reality[0] is spin-doctored into some distorted[1]
view of it, and before my past work is being discredited, I will take
the high road and continue my work on Debian Live images on the outside.
If there is one thing I did learn over the past years of agressions
towards me, then that it is this: I am forced to blindly and
unchallenged accept everything others decide about me or my work,
resistence to the cabal is futile, anything goes, no[2] matter[3] what[4].
Therefore, after having founded Debian Live back in 2006 and having by
now almost 10 years continuously worked on it, without further ado:
Debian Live is dead, hijacked by the debian-cd and the
debian-installer Teams[5]
The live.debian.net server will be shut down end of month, the Git
repositories are read-only as of now and mirrored to GitHub[6] for archival.
So long, and thanks for all the fish[7].
Daniel
[0] https://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2006/08/
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/20 ... 00008.html
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/497471
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/759189
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/754910
[5] https://bugs.debian.org/804315
[6] https://github.com/debian-live
[7] http://live.debian.net/project/downstream/
In my communications with him , he responded in a mature sensible way, and promptly, as well as politely, unlike some of the others , but that is anotherby dasein »So unless someone convinces this guy to grow up, it looks like Debian will lose its Live image presence.
topic, and it really does not do any good blaming any one individual, teams are teams, and there are several persons invloved, with that said,... this (below)
is another mail list message, from 2 years ago.
Any way, in a nut shell, the few people that feel they really need Live Images,To: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.com>
Cc: formorer@debian.org, debian-live@lists.debian.org
Subject: debian-live Alioth project
From: "Iain R. Learmonth" <irl@debian.org>
=========================
Hi Daniel,
As part of the process of integrating the live systems better into the
Debian Organisation, we would like to host the sources for live-* packages
on Alioth where it is easier for others in the Debian project to contribute
code, documentation and translations.
We would also like to move any web content to either webwml or to being
hosted on Alioth where webwml is not appropriate.
Please accept my request to join the Alioth project and set me to have
administrator rights for the project so I can process new member requests,
configure mailing lists and configure the VCS.
Thanks,
Iain.
Debian, or what ever, are going to need to learn how to
1. Do their own searches,
2.Maybe learn how to make their own live image, and customize it
to fit their needs.
3. Or get involved with the Debian Developers, and volunteer to take this on
someone probably will, but it kind of jumps back to this:
There really will all ways be uses and future for Debian Live images, butBut given how badly the last external maintainer was treated, whodafugg would volunteer for that gig?
they may not be easily available, or the future is "roll your own" so to speak.
Personally, I have no use for the newest ones, Debian 8 and 9, I have very good
ones that were made from Debian 6 and 7, and those are all I need.
Guess that is all for now.
P.S. A little search foo, and one can find not only some excellent Linux live images, but tutorials on making them, it can be done using your Debian system,
as well as other distros, and also there are some "ready made" ones available.
The MX live images images also work very well.
They are based on Debian, so that is a very good option.
--- sorry, for any spelling or other mistakes, I have to run, and have not yet
"previewd" or proof read my post
Last edited by GarryRicketson on 2017-06-28 22:52, edited 1 time in total.
"What we expect you have already Done"
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
==========
Old Website
======================
For the Birds
==================
What Does a Parrot Know About PTSD?
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
My introduction to debian was via a live disk ,so would be sad to see it go.
Dont think i would have tried debian without it.
Didnt come across any major problems with the Jessie live install or ubuntu live disks that ive tried in the past.
Hope that debian live images does have a future and i appreciate the work that goes into making them.
Dont think i would have tried debian without it.
Didnt come across any major problems with the Jessie live install or ubuntu live disks that ive tried in the past.
Hope that debian live images does have a future and i appreciate the work that goes into making them.
- GarryRicketson
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
- Location: Durango, Mexico
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
Thanks, I do think it is a important part and important that Debian offers
a way that people wanting to "sample" or just try Debian for their first time.
On all the distros I have tried, if there had not been a live CD image, it is very
unlikely I would have tried them.
It is a valuable promotional medium to offer Live images, as well as something
that can be used as a utility or tool, if and when needed.
a way that people wanting to "sample" or just try Debian for their first time.
On all the distros I have tried, if there had not been a live CD image, it is very
unlikely I would have tried them.
It is a valuable promotional medium to offer Live images, as well as something
that can be used as a utility or tool, if and when needed.
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
+1. There is an alternative. One can try a distro on a virtual machine.GarryRicketson wrote:On all the distros I have tried, if there had not been a live CD image, it is very
unlikely I would have tried them.
Re: Do live Debian images have a future?
I agree. A lot of the distros I've tried, it was because they were Debian derivatives that had Debian repos in the sources.list, and because they had live/install images when Debian didn't. I was elated when I found out about the now-deceased Debian Live Project; later, I was even happier when I found "official" Debian live/install images.GarryRicketson wrote:Thanks, I do think it is a important part and important that Debian offers
a way that people wanting to "sample" or just try Debian for their first time.
On all the distros I have tried, if there had not been a live CD image, it is very
unlikely I would have tried them.
It is a valuable promotional medium to offer Live images, as well as something
that can be used as a utility or tool, if and when needed.
In some situations, like when I wasn't sure how Debian would work out on a particular computer, I'd download some other distro's live/install iso instead, because it was just a little too much trouble to install Debian just for testing.
Well, either way, I'll keep using Debian, just as I have been for all these years. But having good live/install images available does make things nicer for me.