Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

Here you can discuss every aspect of Debian. Note: not for support requests!
Message
Author
deborah-and-ian
Posts: 182
Joined: 2016-07-13 08:40

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#21 Post by deborah-and-ian »

The 1st article reads to me somewhat like the user hasn't properly configured his video card and that certain network adapters just lack drivers. Or how would you interpret the firmware loading failure? I think they should repeat the same with the firmware-enabled images. Frankly, I'm sick of these articles where it's the fault of open source that proprietary drivers can't be included. The conclusion here is that Debian as a product is inferior because the community isn't a company that licenses proprietary software.

EDIT: Same apparently goes for article 2:
To start with, Debain 9 Stretch failed to configure the Wireless network card on my computer, which is Intel Corporation Wireless 3160 (rev 83). I understand that iwlwifi is a non-free component, but all the distributions I tried before on the same laptop managed that difficulty.
Debian GNU/Linux 9 Stretch w/Openbox

Acer Aspire E5-521G
AMD A8-6410 APU
4 GB RAM
integrated AMD Mullins
dedicated AMD Hainan Radeon R5 M240 2 GB
240 GB Toshiba Q300 SSD
Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 ethernet
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 wireless

User avatar
dasein
Posts: 7680
Joined: 2011-03-04 01:06
Location: Terra Incantationum

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#22 Post by dasein »

sgage wrote:This 'experience' talk is marketing-speak. In other words, meaningless babble.
Uh, no. UX is real science with real metrics; here's a gentle introduction: http://www.wqusability.com/articles/get ... arted.html

I've never understood why the fanbois from any distro (including Debian) get their panties in a wad simply because other people have the audacity to have different tastes, different evaluation criteria, different use-cases, etc.

I mean, okay, J Random Blogger prefers, say, OpenSUSE to Debian, tomato soup to onion soup, likes Star Trek over Star Wars, et cetera, ad nauseam.

So the *$^*% what? Why do you care what someone else thinks? Why exactly does it become necessary to attack them personally?

Edited for clarity
Last edited by dasein on 2017-07-18 13:06, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lysander
Posts: 643
Joined: 2017-02-23 10:07
Location: London
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#23 Post by Lysander »

dasein wrote:Uh, no. But cheer up--your fact-free mini-rant certainly is: http://www.wqusability.com/articles/get ... arted.html
This reads like recruitment material for a multi-level marketing scam or pyramid scheme. Utterly vacuous.

User avatar
dasein
Posts: 7680
Joined: 2011-03-04 01:06
Location: Terra Incantationum

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#24 Post by dasein »

Lysander wrote:
dasein wrote:Uh, no. But cheer up--your fact-free mini-rant certainly is: http://www.wqusability.com/articles/get ... arted.html
This reads like recruitment material for a multi-level marketing scam or pyramid scheme. Utterly vacuous.
Huh? The article gently introduces specific, reliable metrics for measuring user experience.

It's fascinating to me that the voices screaming "subjective" and "vacuous" offer absolutely no reliable method for measuring that which they so bitterly decry.

User avatar
Lysander
Posts: 643
Joined: 2017-02-23 10:07
Location: London
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#25 Post by Lysander »

dasein wrote:
Lysander wrote:
dasein wrote:Uh, no. But cheer up--your fact-free mini-rant certainly is: http://www.wqusability.com/articles/get ... arted.html
This reads like recruitment material for a multi-level marketing scam or pyramid scheme. Utterly vacuous.
Huh? The article gently introduces specific, reliable measures for user experience.

It's fascinating to me that the two voices thus far screaming "subjective" and "vacuous" offer absolutely no reliable method for measuring that which they so bitterly decry.
In that case it is the tone and writing style of the material that irks me and which obscures the value of its content, unfortunately.

Also - apologies, it seems I misunderstood your post, dasein. I thought you were decrying the linked material rather than supporting it. Nevertheless, as I say I don't favour that writing style very much, though I accept that there may be useful material within.

User avatar
None1975
df -h | participant
df -h | participant
Posts: 1389
Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 65 times

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#26 Post by None1975 »

buntunub wrote:Speaking of which, how is that working out for you guys?.
Works nice, and trouble free. I mean Debian 8.8 and Debian 9.0.
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github

User avatar
dasein
Posts: 7680
Joined: 2011-03-04 01:06
Location: Terra Incantationum

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#27 Post by dasein »

Lysander wrote:...it seems I misunderstood your post, dasein
My sincere thanks for pointing out my lack of clarity. I've edited my earlier post in hopes of making myself more clear.
Lysander wrote:I don't favour that writing style very much, though I accept that there may be useful material within.
I'm not a huge fan of either her style or her tone. But her presentation struck me as somewhat more inviting than the standard "bullet list" of UX dimensions (efficiency, effectiveness, learnability, memorability, and satisfaction), along with the metrics used to measure each of them.

But maybe I was wrong. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

User avatar
Danielsan
Posts: 659
Joined: 2010-10-10 22:36
Has thanked: 5 times

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#28 Post by Danielsan »

dasein wrote:I've never understood why the fanbois from any distro (including Debian) get their panties in a wad simply because other people have the audacity to have different tastes, different evaluation criteria, different use-cases, etc.
I am not a fanboy but I am surely against those article that are pretty individual but want rise itself as universal, especially from someone that opened his article like: In my long history as a distro tester, I've only tried pure Debian twice :?

From newbyes that have few, or nothing, experience with GNU/Linux I can understand their frustration because is a common experience for almost every all, but people with experience should have learned there are hardware less linux kernel friendly as well as when you are having issues with a fresh installation most of the time is because you; in that case there aren't different tastes or different evaluation criteria just people who failed doing an installation.

User avatar
dasein
Posts: 7680
Joined: 2011-03-04 01:06
Location: Terra Incantationum

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#29 Post by dasein »

Danielsan wrote:<blah blah blah>
Yeah, and people prefer jam to jelly "shouldn't" express their preferences, lest they confuse some poor person unfamiliar with fruit preserves.
Danielsan wrote:...when you are having issues with a fresh installation most of the time is because [of] you
Remind me again what planet you said you were from? Installation issues because of crappy installer UIs are the single biggest UX pain-point in all of LinuxLand (very notably including Debian).
Danielsan wrote:I am not a fanboy

Not to worry. You fake it remarkably well. :roll:

Afterthought: I remember my first "starter" distro was widely praised for its newbie-friendly installer. I also remember being asked "newbie-friendly" questions like "Save changes to /etc/fstab?". And I also recall, as I was completing my roughly fifth unsuccessful install, screaming at the screen, "I don't phugging know! Is there an English translation for this question????

It's just too easy for folks to overlook prerequisite knowledge. I remember my first visit to one particular building. There, posted prominently in what I feel sure was a sincere attempt to help, was a sign that read:

Code: Select all

This door to remain locked at all times
Please use west doors for entrance
Which, of course, is really handy information for anyone who already knows which direction they're facing, or for those prescient enough to bring a compass with them. But the person trying to help never thought simply to draw an arrow in the correct direction.

For those who actually care, a classic introduction to the wider subject area of interface/industrial design is here: https://www.amazon.com/Design-Everyday- ... 989&sr=1-2

(Sorry for the hijack.)

pcalvert
Posts: 1939
Joined: 2006-04-21 11:19
Location: Sol Sector
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#30 Post by pcalvert »

FreewheelinFrank wrote: The reviewer also seems to be unaware that the kernel might need some non-free firmware in order to run his/her hardware. As comments are not open, there is no way to recommend the live edition with non-free packages.
Don't worry, multiple people have already informed him.
Freespoke is a new search engine that respects user privacy and does not engage in censorship.

User avatar
Danielsan
Posts: 659
Joined: 2010-10-10 22:36
Has thanked: 5 times

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#31 Post by Danielsan »

dasein wrote:
Danielsan wrote:<blah blah blah>
:lol:

I am almost agree with you but we have to separate facts from the opinions.

1) People mostly complain because hardware fail to work properly or because the DE are ugly.

hardware fail to work properly: this is not absolutely fault of Debian it depends by the hardware or by some binary firmware missing. Anyway is not fault of Debian or any other distro. Debian even if shipped with free-software provides non-free repositories and unofficial cd installation with binary driver as well. If your wifi card still continues to work improperly is not fault of debian, isn't it?

The DE is ugly: That's true, at least for Debian, but Debian collects upstream software with very few improvements (I remember the tragedy of the font renderings) eventually something is changing but the most is up to the devs, not even the maintainers. Can we blame Debian for it? I don't believe, Debian is the only distro that provides thousand of tested and patched packages is a huge task. Making Debian cool is up to the users, this is the deal.

2) The installer is hard to use.

Since Wheezy the installer did big improvement, and is easy to use and easy to understand. Probably is not fancy. What I dislike more is the fact that you have to wait until the end to confirm where install the MBR, if you could set up that at the beginning, after the first steps, you could do whatever you want during the installation. I don't believe the steps of the Debian Installer are really rational and in fact Ubuntu and Mint installer let you select where install the MBR at the beginning. However Debian Installer let you install the OS in a lot of architecture the others distros mostly I686/AMD64, we can deal with its behavior even if it is pretty annoying.

3) The installer is not sexy, the DE is not sexy, nothing is sexy at all.

Debian is not sexy at all. When a product is not commercial doesn't need to be sexy because don't need to sell itself. The other distros that try to be sexy are most of the time the ones with a narcissist people behind like Ubuntu, Mint and Elementary. The sexy distros have been trying to monetize its product with more or less success. Can we rely on sexy distro? No we don't, Ubuntu without Debian is nothing, doesn't matter snappy.

4) Why sexy distros?

Sexy distro should be avoid the spreading of stupid articles like the ones inside this thread but often miss their mission, why? Most people still have trouble to understand Debian.

deborah-and-ian
Posts: 182
Joined: 2016-07-13 08:40

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#32 Post by deborah-and-ian »

dasein wrote: I've never understood why the fanbois from any distro (including Debian) get their panties in a wad simply because other people have the audacity to have different tastes, different evaluation criteria, different use-cases, etc.
I don't think that's really the case here though. I'll attempt an analogy by saying that it's akin to writing a review about an orange being to sweet and bad for all your lemon needs. OK, a bit too simplified, I'll admit, but Debian does not set out to bring easy access to proprietary drivers. Additionally, if you search just a bit, you'll realise that unofficial (yet maintained by a Debian dev) ISOs exist which automatically bring most of the drivers that exist. But disregarding all of that, blaming Debian for being a bad Ubuntu or Mint is not a good review. You could say something along the lines of: Debian isn't for me. I prefer to get my hands less dirty. And that would be perfectly fine, but those articles don't read that way.
Debian GNU/Linux 9 Stretch w/Openbox

Acer Aspire E5-521G
AMD A8-6410 APU
4 GB RAM
integrated AMD Mullins
dedicated AMD Hainan Radeon R5 M240 2 GB
240 GB Toshiba Q300 SSD
Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 ethernet
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 wireless

Felix Carbury
Posts: 21
Joined: 2013-08-10 10:00

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#33 Post by Felix Carbury »

Poor ol’ Dedoimedo. Apparently he hasn’t read Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s Antifragile. If he had he would understand better that the last thing anyone needs is a Central Governing Body making the big decisions for everyone. Tinkering, trial and error, lots of different examples and experiments are what make complex systems healthy. The Linux world is just such an antifragile system.

What Mr. D. calls drawbacks and flaws are actually strengths.

User avatar
Gaius
Posts: 33
Joined: 2012-12-18 10:54
Location: Germany

Re: Some people don't like Debian 9 [ARTICLES]

#34 Post by Gaius »

Debian 9 Stretch is a horrible disappointment. It's a completely unusable product in my scenario, and I see no real reason why I should bother using it. Ubuntu and friends offer a superior experience. Perhaps Debian serves a purposes somewhere, but I fail to see it. What really irks me is that in six or so years since I've last tried it, it's as if nothing at all has changed. Exactly the same kind of issues, only different hardware and kernel modules.
http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/debian-9.html
What can one say?
I guess Mr Ljubuncic (a/k/a Dedoimedo) should stick to reviewing games on Windows.

I installed Stretch from CD some days ago.
My 2 LG screens, the GeForce GTX graphics card and the Realtek HD Audio, along with wired Internet, worked flawlessly from the first minute, with native drivers.
Then I had to spend 20 minutes setting up my WiFi.

Some people just expect to be spoon-fed, like toddlers.

And as for "sluggish" behaviour: Stretch boots in under 15 seconds, and that includes 5 seconds delay for the GRUB2 splash ...
... if you have hardware which has been manufactured by a brand name in this millennium, that is.
If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.
Albert Einstein

Post Reply