https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/ ... ity-awards
Quote from article : " ...the lamest vendor response award went to Systemd supremo Lennart Poettering for his controversial, and perhaps questionable, handling of the following bugs in everyone's favorite init replacement: 5998, 6225, 6214, 5144, and 6237... "
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: 2015-08-30 20:14
Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards
LOL the comment section is on fire and funny as hell.
EDIT: Systemd is working as intended
EDIT: Systemd is working as intended
Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards
To exploit the issue, an attacker would have to convince an administrator – someone who already has root access – to install...
Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards
Very first comment almost made me schnertz.Wheelerof4te wrote:LOL the comment section is on fire and funny as hell.
Re: systemd-named-lamest-at-security-awards
This one truly got meBack in the days when Mono was considered a submarine way to give Microsoft control over Linux, there was such universal hate then.
Reply to This
Maybe systemd needs more security-caring contributors (or someone that tells Pottering to be a little less "stubborn")
I would exchange everything I know in exchange for half of what I don't.